首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Listen to the following passage. Write in English a short summary of around 150-200 words of what you have heard. You will hear
Listen to the following passage. Write in English a short summary of around 150-200 words of what you have heard. You will hear
admin
2017-02-22
73
问题
Listen to the following passage. Write in English a short summary of around 150-200 words of what you have heard. You will hear the passage only once and then you will have 25 minutes to finish your summary. This part of the test carries 20 points. You may need to scribble a few notes to write your summary.
Most economic forecasts are wrong. And governments usually fail when they try to fine-tune the economics in the short term. That’s not surprising, argues Paul Ormerod in his book Butterfly Economics, because few underlying economic theories and models come anywhere near real life. Ormerod, an economist and director of the London Think Tank, has dumped on the blinkered world of mainstream economic thought before, in his book, The Death of Economics. This time, he argues that his colleagues with the dismal science should instead view "society as a living creature, which adapts and learns. "
Ormerod calls his approach butterfly economics, in part to stress its link to biology. But it also reflects a principle advanced, by chaos theorists that the fluttering of a butterfly’s wings can set off a tornado in another part of the globe. Modern economics, he says, are "complex systems which hover on the brink of chaos. " But Ormerod could just as easily have titled it Ant Model Economics, because his theories derive from entomologists’ experiments with ants in the mid-1980s. Two equal-sized food sources were set equidistant from an ant’s nest. How did the colony divide itself between the sources? As it turned out, the proportion of ants visiting one site or the other changed constantly. Sometimes changes were small. Other times, shifts were dramatic and swift. None was predictable. Why? Basically, a foraging ant has three choices: returning to the food source it successfully visited before; being persuaded by other ants, via a scent, to try the other pile; or turning to the humans. People can stick with a previous decision, change their minds on their own accord, or be persuaded by the actions of others.
That people are often influenced by others, the author says, goes a long way toward explaining why some inferior technologies squeeze out superior ones, like VHS videocassette recorders upstaging Betamax VCRS, or why traders continue to buy currencies they know to be overvalued. Popularity breeds popularity. This may all seem obvious. But for economists, it’s a revelation. Standard economic theories nearly always assume that people’s behavior and tastes never change — which helps explain why most theories can’t pass a reality check. In real life, chaos — in the form of human decision making — reigns.
The ant model shows that accurate short-term predictions of ant behavior are impossible. But in long term, there is a pattern to the ants’ randomness. And, Ormerod says, so it is with economics, too. Short-term governmental forecasts usually miss the mark. And the abilities of politicians to alter the cycles of business are " largely illusory," he insists. But in the long term, there is some structure. The business cycle, with all its constant ebbing and flowing, may be uncontrollable and defiant of near-term forecasts. But despite its fluctuations, capitalist economies have grown slowly and steadily over time. That means, he says, mat policymakers should adopt a less-is-more approach. "The role of governments should be confined to trying to mitigate the consequences of a cycle rather than trying to eliminate it. "
Ormerod’s effort to persuade orthodox economists to take human behavior into account more often — regardless of its unpredictability — is a worthy goal. Still, it’s a bit dispiriting that his foraging ants, like Pavlvov’s salivating dogs, depict our behavior so accurately.
选项
答案
Most economic forecasts are wrong. And governments usually fail when they try to fine-tune the economics in the short term. That’s not surprising, argues Paul Ormerod in his book Butterfly Economics, because few underlying economic theories and models come anywhere near real life. Ormerod, an economist and director of the London Think Tank, has dumped on the blinkered world of mainstream economic thought before, in his book, The Death of Economics. This time, he argues that his colleagues with the dismal science should instead view " society as a living creature, which adapts and learns. " Ormerod calls his approach butterfly economics, in part to stress its link to biology. But it also reflects a principle advanced by chaos theorists that the fluttering of a butterfly’s wings can set off a tornado in another part of the globe. Modern economics, he says, are "complex systems which hover on the brink of chaos. " But Ormerod could just as easily have titled it Ant Model Economics, because his theories derive from entomologists’ experiments with ants in the mid-1980s. Two equal-sized food sources were set equidistant from an ant’s nest. How did the colony divide itself between the sources? As it turned out, the proportion of ants visiting one site or the other changed constantly. Sometimes changes were small. Other times, shifts were dramatic and swift. None was predictable. Why? Basically, a foraging ant has three choices: returning to the food source it successfully visited before; being persuaded by other ants, via a scent, to try the other pile; or turning to the humans. People can stick with a previous decision, change their minds on their own accord, or be persuaded by the actions of others. That people are often influenced by others, the author says, goes a long way toward explaining why some inferior technologies squeeze out superior ones, like VHS videocassette recorders upstaging Betamax VCRS, or why traders continue to buy currencies they know to be overvalued. Popularity breeds popularity. This may all seem obvious. But for economists, it’s a revelation. Standard economic theories nearly always assume that people’s behavior and tastes never change — which helps explain why most theories can’t pass a reality check. In real life, chaos — in the form of human decision-making — reigns. The ant model shows that accurate short-term predictions of ant behavior are impossible. But in long term, there is a pattern to the ants’ randomness. And, Ormerod says, so it is with economics, too. Short-term governmental forecasts usually miss the mark. And the abilities of politicians to alter the cycles of business are "largely illusory," he insists. But in the long term, there is some structure. The business cycle, with all its constant ebbing and flowing, may be uncontrollable and defiant of near-term forecasts. But despite its fluctuations, capitalist economies have grown slowly and steadily over time. That means, he says, that policymakers should adopt a less-is-more approach. " The role of governments should be confined to trying to mitigate the consequences of a cycle rather than trying to eliminate it. " Ormerod’s effort to persuade orthodox economists to take human behavior into account more often — regardless of its unpredictability — is a worthy goal. Still, it’s a bit dispiriting that his foraging ants, like Pavlvov’s salivating dogs, depict our behavior so accurately.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/bA0O777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级口译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级口译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
TheregionaroundtheBelgiancityofWaterlooisbusilypreparingtocommemoratethe200thanniversaryofoneofthemajorbatt
Freudiantheoryindeedtookwestern20th-centurycivilizationbystorm.Howso?Theanswerliesinfourfactors.OfFreud’s
"Thelanguageofacomposer",Carduswrote,"hisharmonies,rhythms,melodies,colorsandtexture,cannotbeseparatedexceptby
Accordingtotheweatherforecast,whichisusually______,itwillrainthisafternoon.
TheculturesofChinaandJapanhavesharedmanyfeatures,buteachhasusedthemaccordingtoitsnational______.
Ifyouleftyourbookonthetableovernight,youwouldfindthefollowingmorningthatitwasstillexactlywhenyouhadlefti
Ifyouleftyourbookonthetableovernight,youwouldfindthefollowingmorningthatitwasstillexactlywhenyouhadlefti
Stylisticdifferencesareavailabletoallmaturenativespeakersandinliteratecommunitiestoallwriters,aswellastofore
Whatdoesthespeakerfeelaboutsummerpictures?
随机试题
We’llvisitEuropenextyear______wehaveenoughmoney.
患者,男性,60岁,因胃溃疡合并多次大出血,行胃大部切除术。术后10天,已进流质饮食,突然出现呕吐,禁食后症状好转。钡餐检查见输出段有较长狭窄,形似漏斗。该病人可选择的治疗措施不包括()
计量检测设备应有明显的()标志,标明计量器具所处的状态。
Untiladecadeortwoago,thecentersofmanyWesterncitieswereemptyingwhiletheiredgeswerespreading.Thiswasnotfort
①各类投资顾问公司水平参差不齐,在为国有资产形态转换服务的过程中,很难实现国有资产形态转换方向正确、转换目的有效、转换过程______之目标。②面对对手的顽强防守,马竞队的进攻完全找不到目标,在进攻______的情况下,队员们越来越着急,这也导致了防守方面
下列选项中,属于法治基本原则的有()。(2011法多25)
甲为一砖厂老板,由乙负责为其招募若干小工(均未满16周岁)从事砖块生产,规定任何时候都不得离开厂区,并指令在监工丙的命令和监视下每人每天必须干16小时,如遇反抗则遭到毒打或罚加班2小时,其中一小工丁被乙毒打致残,小工戊在点火时不小心引发特大火灾。则甲、乙的
[*]
Hippiesweremembersofayouthmovementofthe1960’sand1970’sthatstartedintheUnitedStatesandspreadtoCanada,Great
democracyimaginationdifferentflexibilityovercomeonlineoffertraditionalmodern
最新回复
(
0
)