首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2013-06-12
37
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
The passage suggests that in for-profit organizations ______ .
选项
A、there is no end of conflict
B、expression of different opinions is encouraged
C、decisions must be justifiable
D、success lies in general agreement
答案
D
解析
由第四段最后一句可知,经理们(executives)相信大家意见一致(consensus)而非意见不和(conflict)会提高财经指数(financial indicators)。这与D选项“对于以盈利为目的机构来说,成功在于意见的大致统一(general agreement)”基本一致。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/bFhi777K
0
在职申硕(同等学力)英语
相关试题推荐
Visualimpairment(视觉障碍)carrieswithitareducedorrestrictedabilitytotravelthroughone’sphysicalandsocialenvironmentu
Accordingtothispassage,troublesontheroadareprimarilycausedby______.Thesentence"Youmighttoleratetherudeandin
Asregardshisparents’shoppingforthegrandchildren,theauthor______"Personalitytransformation"intheauthor’sparents
Man:Hey,Mary.IwasinvitedtobeajudgefortheMissAmericaBeautyContest.Woman:Oh,really?Comeon,you’repullingmyl
Childrenmodelthemselveslargelyontheirparents.Theydosomainlythroughidentification.Childrenidentify【C1】______apar
Conventionalwisdomaboutconflictseemsprettymuchcutanddried.Toolittleconflictbreedsapathy(冷淡)andstagnation(呆滞).
Althoughinteriordesignhasexistedsincethebeginningofarchitecture,itsdevelopmentintoaspecializedfieldisreallyqui
Itisobviousthatthesportsgamesarenolongeramateuraffairs;theyhavebecomeprofessionally______.
Manydifferentmeaningshavebeengiventothewordpoetry.ItwouldwearymyreadersifIweretodiscusswhichofthesedefini
随机试题
公民素质教育主要是指
口腔牙合面部感染病原菌最常见的是
A.ABO及RhD血型均与患儿母亲相同的红细胞及血浆B.RhD阴性红细胞﹢RhD阳性血浆C.O型红细胞﹢AB型血浆D.ABO及RhD血型均与患儿相同的红细胞及血浆E.RhD阴性红细胞﹢RhD阴性血浆RhD新生儿溶血病换血宜选
58岁女性,绝经5年,少许阴道流血2个月,妇科检查:外阴丰满,阴道可见黏膜皱襞,分泌物多,应疑为
项目可行性研究的环境影响量化分析的主要方法是()。
修正的总费用法中,修正的内容有()。
简述个别托盘的优点。
设A(2,2),B(1,1),Г是从点A到点B的线段下方的一条光滑定向曲线y=y(x),且它与围成的面积为2,又φ(y)有连续导数,求曲线积分I=∫Г[πφ(y)cosπx一2πy]dx+[φ’(y)sinπx一2π]dy.
ItisbecauseEnglishisveryuseful______.
A、Beauty.B、Loyalty.C、Luck.D、Durability.A短文中提到,钻戒代表美丽,故答案为A。
最新回复
(
0
)