首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
There is no question that the old style of air pollution could kill people. In one week following the infamous "peasouper" fog i
There is no question that the old style of air pollution could kill people. In one week following the infamous "peasouper" fog i
admin
2015-01-09
79
问题
There is no question that the old style of air pollution could kill people. In one week following the infamous "peasouper" fog in December 1952, 4,700 people died in London. Most of these people were elderly and already had heart or lung diseases. A series of these killer fogs eventually led to the British Passing the Clean Air Act which restricted the burning of coal.
Fortunately the effect of smog on the lungs is not so dramatic. Scientists have now conducted a number of laboratory experiments in which volunteers are exposed to ozone inside a steel chamber for a few hours. Even at quite low concentrations there is a reversible fall in lung function, an increase in the irritability of the lungs and evidence of airway inflammation(发炎). Although irritable and inflamed lungs are particularly seen in people with asthma(哮喘)and other lung diseases, these effects of ozone also occur in healthy subjects. Similar changes are also seen after exposure to nitrogen dioxide, although there is some disagreement about the concentration at which they occur.
Other studies have found that people living in areas with high levels of pollution have more symptoms and worse hung function than those living in areas with clean air. Groups of children attending school camps show falls in lung function even at quite low concentrations of ozone. There is also a relationship between ozone levels and hospital admissions for asthma, both in North America and Australia. It is suspected that long-term exposure to smog may result in chronic bronchitis(支气管炎)and emphysema(肺气肿), but this has yet to be proven.
Recently an association has been found between the levels of particles in the air and death rates in North American cities. The reason for this association is not understood and as yet there is no evidence this occurs in Australia However, we do know that hazy days are associated with more asthma attacks in children.
The relationship between exposure to_____has not yet been determined.
选项
A、ozone and fall in lung function
B、ozone and lung diseases such as asthma
C、nitrogen dioxide and worse lung function
D、smog and chronic bronchitis and emphysema
答案
D
解析
根据文中的“It is suspected that long-term exposure to smog may result in chronic bronchitis(支气管炎)and emphysema(肺气肿),but this has yet to be proven”可知,这些疾病和烟雾之间的关联还有待验证,因此选项D正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/bKQO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Inrecentyears,businessschools______themaster’sdegreeinbusinessadministrationenjoygreatpopularityamongthemanagemen
Theconsumer______inrecentyearshasledtoanexplosionofshoppingcenterdevelopmentinbigcitieslikeBeijing,Shanghaian
TomorrowJapanandSouthKoreawillcelebrateWhiteDay,anannualeventwhenmenareexpectedtobuyagiftfortheadoredwome
Atmanycolleges,smokersarebeingrunnotjustoutofschoolbuildingsbutoffthepremises.OnNov.19,theUniversityofKen
Ifhalftheenergythatgoesintoviolentactswereputtogooduse,ifoureffortsweredirectedatcleaninguptheslumsandg
Nosingleelementhastantalizedandtormentedthehumanimaginationmorethantheshimmeringmetalknownbythechemicalsymbol
ThereisonelastquestionImustdealwithinthischapter.Whyshouldhumanbeingsbemoral?Anotherwayofputtingtheproble
TheordinaryfamilycolonialNorthAmericawasprimarilyconcernedwithsheerphysicalsurvivalandbeyondthat,itsowneconomi
TheordinaryfamilycolonialNorthAmericawasprimarilyconcernedwithsheerphysicalsurvivalandbeyondthat,itsowneconomi
随机试题
在骨骼肌收缩过程中,能与细肌丝结合的是
关于起搏器间期的描述,错误的是
下列叙述中哪一项是不正确的
卡氏肺孢子虫病的传播途径是
股票属于()。
按水利工程建设程序,某丘陵地区拟建一座进水闸,水闸由闸室和上、下游连接段组成。闸室采用分离式底板,底板厚1.2m,闸底板混凝土用砂的细度模数控制在2.3~3.0之间。下游连接段包括翼墙、护坦、海漫、防冲槽等。闸室建在岩基上,地基需要进行固结灌浆处理。根据施
下列关于无粘结预应力筋布置安装的施工工艺的叙述,正确的是()。
项目生产条件分析主要包括()。
2016年是全球气候充满极端状况的一年。大气中的二氧化碳平均浓度已经超过400ppm(1ppm为百万分之一)警示线,甲烷浓度也飙升破纪录,忾候变化的长期指标上升至新水平。南极和北极地区的海冰面积缩减严重,打破最低纪录。俄罗斯、北极地区气温比长期平均温度高6
根据概率论,抛出一枚均匀的硬币,其正面朝上和反面朝上的概率几乎相等。我与人打赌,若抛出硬币正面朝上,我赢:若反面朝上,我输。我抛出硬币6次。结果都是反面朝上,已经连输6次。因此,我后面的几次抛出肯定是正面朝上,一定会赢回来。下面哪一个选项是对“我”的推理的
最新回复
(
0
)