首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
What do the extraordinarily successful companies have in common? To find out, we looked for correlations. We know that correlati
What do the extraordinarily successful companies have in common? To find out, we looked for correlations. We know that correlati
admin
2011-03-14
28
问题
What do the extraordinarily successful companies have in common? To find out, we looked for correlations. We know that correlations are not always reliable; nevertheless, in the 27 survivors, our group saw four shared personality traits that could explain their longevity.
Conservatism in financing. The companies did not risk their capital gratuitously. They understood the meaning of money in an old-fashioned way; they knew the usefulness of spare cash in the kitty. Money in hand allowed them to snap up options when their competitors could not. They did not have to convince third-party financiers of the attractiveness of opportunities they wanted to pursue. Money in the kitty allowed them to govern their growth and evolution.
Sensitivity to the world around them. Whether they had built their fortunes on knowledge (such as Dupont’s technological innovations) or on natural resources (such as the Hudson’s Bay Company’s access to the furs of Canadian forests), the living companies in our study were able to adapt themselves to changes in the world around them. As wars, depressions, technologies, and politics surged and ebbed, they always seemed to excel at keeping their feelers out, staying attuned to whatever was going on. For information, they sometimes relied on packets carried over vast distances by portage and ship, yet they managed to react in a timely fashion to whatever news they received. They were good at learning and adapting.
Awareness of their identity. No matter how broadly diversified the companies were, their employees all felt like parts of a whole. Lord Cole, chairman of Unilever in the 1960s, for example, saw the company as a fleet of ships. Each ship was independent, but the whole fleet was greater than the sum of its parts. The feeling of belonging to an organization and identifying with its achievements is often dismissed as soft. But case histories repeatedly show that a sense of community is essential for long-term survival. Managers in the living companies we studied were chosen mostly from within, and all considered themselves to be stewards of a longstanding enterprise. Their top priority was keeping the institution at least as healthy as it had been when they took over.
Tolerance of new ideas. The long-lived companies in our study tolerated activities in the margin: experiments and eccentricities that stretched their understanding. They recognized that new businesses may be entirely unrelated to existing businesses and that the act of starting a business need not be centrally controlled. W.R. Grace, from its very beginning, encouraged autonomous experimentation. The company was founded in 1854 by an Irish immigrant in Peru and traded in guano, a natural fertilizer, before it moved into sugar and tin. Eventually, the company established Pan American Airways. Today it is primarily a chemical company, although it is also the leading provider of kidney dialysis services in the United States.
By definition, a company that survives for more than a century exists in a world it cannot hope to control. Multinational companies are similar to the long-surviving companies of our study in that way. The world of a multinational is very large and stretches across many cultures. That world is inherently less stable and more difficult to influence than a confined national habitat. Multinationals, like enduring companies, must be willing to change in order to succeed.
These four traits form the essential character of companies that have functioned successfully for hundreds of years. Given this basic personality, what priorities do the managers of living companies set for themselves and their employees?
In what way are multinational companies similar to the long-surviving companies studied?
选项
A、keeping central control
B、willing to change
C、saving money in an old-fashioned way
D、choosing managers from within the company
答案
B
解析
答案在第六段:多国公司和老牌公司一样,要想成功,必须愿意变化(willing to change)。选项A、C、D在原文中均未提到。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/bcsa777K
本试题收录于:
MBA联考(英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
MBA联考(英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Thesmoothlandingoftheshuttle(航天飞机)Discoveryendedaflightthatwassuccessfulinalmosteveryrespectbutone:thedislo
Canada’spremiers(theleadersofprovincialgovernments),iftheyhaveanybreathleftaftercomplainingaboutOttawaattheir
Theopportunitytoexploreandplayandtheencouragementtodosocan______theperformanceofmanychildren.
Thepoorcountriesareextremely______tointernationaleconomicfluctuations.
Large,multinationalcorporationsmaybethecompanieswhoseupsanddownsseizeheadlines.(31)Buttoafargreaterextenttha
Large,multinationalcorporationsmaybethecompanieswhoseupsanddownsseizeheadlines.(31)Buttoafargreaterextenttha
Byeducation,Imeantheinfluenceoftheenvironmentupontheindividualtoproduceapermanentchangeinthehabitsofbehavio
Sportisheadingforanindissolublemarriagewithtelevisionandthepassivespectatorwillenjoyaprivateparadise.Allofth
Writealetterofcomplaintaccordingtothefollowingoutline.(1)2009年3月20日收到“OrderNo.A210”的货物。(2)就包装和质量问题提出抱怨。
Marriageguidancecounsellorsneverstophearingit."He(orshe)neverlistens,"warringcouplescomplain,againandagain,as
随机试题
能产生耳毒性的抗生素:
犬发生急性支气管炎时,血液学检查可见()。
下列哪项不是动脉粥样硬化的血管病理变化
关于节育原理,下述哪项是错误的
A.杜绝对病人的有意伤害B.选择受益最大、损伤最小的治疗方案C.患者及家属无法实行知情同意时,医生可以行使家长权D.对病人一视同仁E.合理筛选肾脏移植受术者体现尊重原则的是
在房源实地勘查前,房地产经纪人应做好的准备工作有()。
关于风险测量的VaR指标,下列说法正确的是()。
甲盗割高压电线,数额较大,同时危害电力安全,对甲()
中国共产党确定土地革命和武装反抗国民党反动派总方针的会议是()
关于嵌入式操作系统及其特点,以下叙述中错误的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)