首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When most animals die, nature likes to tidy up by making their bodies disappear. The remains get eaten by scavengers, bones are
When most animals die, nature likes to tidy up by making their bodies disappear. The remains get eaten by scavengers, bones are
admin
2015-01-09
90
问题
When most animals die, nature likes to tidy up by making their bodies disappear. The remains get eaten by scavengers, bones are scattered, tissues rot away and anything left over tends to get destroyed by the elements. Very occasionally, though, these destructive processes get disrupted. This usually happens when the corpse is quickly buried by sediment deposited by a river or blown in by the wind. Then begins a slow process in which minerals precipitate from groundwater into the encased organic material, eventually replacing it with a stony replica: a fossil.
Such was palaeontological doctrine for decades. But in recent years traces of soft tissue, such as blood vessels and bone cells, have been found in some dinosaur fossils. Now researchers have come up with an explanation for how these tissues were preserved for millions of years, which just might make it possible to extract some elements of prehistoric DNA.
That there was more in a fossil than meets the eye emerged in 2005 when Mary Schweitzer, a palaeobiologist at North Carolina State University, found something unusual after her team used acid to dissolve minerals from a fossilised piece of Tyrannosaurus rex bone. Left behind were some fibrous tissue, transparent blood vessels and cells. Many argued that this material must have come from modern bacteria and not a T. rex, since nothing organic could possibly survive the 68m years since the creature had walked the Earth.
In 2012, however, Dr. Schweitzer and her colleagues revealed the presence of proteins in a dinosaur fossil freshly dug up and carefully protected from any potential contamination. Moreover, one of the proteins the researchers identified could be found only in birds. Since dinosaurs were the ancestors of modern birds, the discovery made it hard to argue that soft-tissue material in the fossil could have come from bacterial contamination. Still, many scientists wondered how such a thing was possible.
In Proceedings of the Royal Society, Dr. Schweitzer and her colleagues collaborated with a team led by Mark Goodwin, a palaeontologist at the University of California, to seek an explanation. Organic material from dinosaur bones was studied using micro x-ray absorption spectroscopy, which allows scientists to examine the structure of matter using intense light beams. This led Dr. Goodwin to notice something remarkable: the organic material in the samples was thickly laced with iron nanoparticles. In animals, iron is most commonly found in blood and this led the researchers to wonder if the iron had come from blood cells that had once flowed through their dinosaur’s veins. Could it have played a part in the preservation of the tissues?
To test this idea, the researchers designed an experiment using freshly slaughtered ostriches which, being large and flightless birds, seemed to be a reasonable modern equivalent to dinosaurs. They extracted blood vessels from the bones of the birds and soaked them in a haemoglobin solution obtained from ruptured ostrich blood cells for 24 hours. The samples were then placed in both a saline solution and sterile distilled water. As a control, some of the blood vessels were put straight into saline solution or water without being pre-soaked in blood.
As expected, the ostrich tissues that went directly into the water and the saline solution fell apart rapidly and were entirely consumed by bacteria or heavily degraded in just three days. The same thing happened to the tissue soaked in haemoglobin and placed in water. But the treated sample in the saline solution remained intact and has stayed that way for two years now, with no signs of bacterial growth.
Dr. Schweitzer and Dr. Goodwin believe that highly reactive ions known as free radicals, which are produced by iron as it is released from the haemoglobin, interact with the organic tissue causing abnormal chemical bonds to form. These bonds effectively tie proteins in knots at the molecular level, much as the preservative formaldehyde does. This knot-tying makes the proteins unrecognizable to the sorts of bacteria that would normally consume them. This, they theorise, is how the soft tissues manage to survive for millions of years without rotting away.
The iron nanoparticles, however, may be doing more than just preserving tissues. Despite what happens in the science fiction world of "Jurassic Park", no dinosaur DNA has yet been found. The reason for this is that DNA is thought to have a half-life of 521 years, which means that, after that much time, half of the bonds between the proteins that make up DNA have broken apart; after another 521 years, another half have gone, and so on. This leaves very little behind after hundreds of thousands of years yet alone the 65m years or so that stand between humanity and dinosaurs. Even so, Dr. Schweitzer and Dr. Goodwin still wondered if the iron-based preservation process might allow DNA to bypass its typical half-life and last a lot longer.
To find that out, the team used an iron-removal compound known as pyridoxal isonicotinic hydrazide and added four different stains that react only with either DNA itself, or with proteins closely associated with it in organisms other than microbes. Remarkably, in all cases, these specific stains lit up inside the ancient cells in the tissue samples. This hints that something chemically very similar to DNA can remain in a fossil and might yet be hidden precisely where it had resided during life.
The author’s attitude toward Dr. Schweitzer and Dr. Goodwin’s speculation on the possibility of DNA preservation is
选项
A、skeptical.
B、supportive.
C、indifferent.
D、optimistic.
答案
B
解析
态度题。作者详细介绍了史怀哲博士和古德温博士的实验与发现,并在最后一段评价这项实验暗示了化石中可能存在着与DNA所含元素相近的化学物质,这说明作者对两位研究者的观点是认同与支持的,故答案为[B]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/bfdO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisINCORRECTaboutMissChan?
WhatDoActiveLearnersDo?Therearedifferencesbetweenactivelearningandpassivelearning.Characteristicsofacti
PeterPanwaswrittenbythefamousdramatist
ImprovingthebalancebetweentheworkingpartofthedayandtherestofitisagoalofagrowingnumberofworkersinrichWe
Intryingtounderstandandcontrolyouthgangs,investigatorsandscholarshaveassembledwhatamountstoanthropologicalstudi
Mostofanimalscommunicatewithoneanothertoagreaterorlesserde-(1)______gree,andthemoresocialaspecies,themore
Cellscannotremainaliveoutsidecertainlimitsoftemperatureandmuchnarrowerlimitsmarktheboundariesofeffectivefunc
A、morethan8,000peopleB、exactly8,282peopleC、morethan9,500peopleD、alltogetherabout18,000peopleC与以上选项中所列数字相关的事件分别为:
Amorphemeisatwo-facetlanguageunit,whichpossessesboth
随机试题
大道之行也,与三代之英,丘未之逮也,而有志焉。
=()
烧伤深度的估计,最常采用()
心包积液与右心功能不全的区别是
A.胃寒B.气滞C.食积D.肝胃郁热E.血瘀胃脘胀满疼痛,嗳气酸腐,不欲食,证属()
某公路工程施工过程中发生如下事件:事件1:根据4、5、6三个月混凝土试块抗压强度统计数据资料,分布绘制出3个直方图,经判断其形态分别是孤岛形、双峰形、绝壁形。事件2:专业监理工程师在检查混凝土试块强度报告时,发现下部结构有一批混凝土试块
某开发公司购买空地一块,拟开发住宅小区。地价800万元一次付清,预计建设期为两年,第一年建设投资600万元,第二年建设投资1000万元,住宅总建筑面积16000平方米,预计平均售价为2500元/平方米;销售计划为:建设期第一、二年分别预售房屋的10%和20
在我党建党初期,有人认为中国近代社会资产阶级的力量比农民集中,比工人阶级雄厚,资产阶级革命应由资产阶级领导,无产阶级只是帮手,这种观点( )
(清华大学2008年试题)ThechangesingloballyaveragedtemperaturethathaveoccurredattheEarth’ssurfaceoverthepastcenturya
Arapidportfolioturnoverratemayprecludelowlong-termcapitalgains.
最新回复
(
0
)