首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
49
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
According to the author, all the students know that ______.
选项
A、there are great differences among the lecturers as to their quality of teaching
B、quite a lot of teachers can produce the results students desire
C、they must be inspired to learn
D、it is too dull to attend lectures
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/brlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Thatactorwasalmost______(know)beforeheplayedthatpart.
Shepulledawayfromthewindow______anyoneshouldseethem.
AtthefirstsighttheplanetMarsdoesnotappearverywelcometoanykindoflife.Ithasverylittleoxygenandwater;thete
Memoryistheabilitytokeeptrackofthingsthathavehappenedinthepast.Memoryreallyislearning.Oneneedsmemorytorid
Herearetwolettersfromourreadersexpressingtheirconcernaboutschoolassessment(评价):Studentsshouldbeallowedtos
I’mreadinganewspaper_____MrZhangiswritingaletter.
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorresp
Whensomeonehasmoney【56】hewantstoputinasageplace,he【57】takesittoabank.Untilrecentlythevery【58】ofthebankbuil
Whensomeonehasmoney【56】hewantstoputinasageplace,he【57】takesittoabank.Untilrecentlythevery【58】ofthebankbuil
Crimehasitsowncycles,amagazinereportedsomeyearsago.Policerecordsthatwerestudiedforfiveyearsfromover2,400ci
随机试题
WhenIwasalittlegirl,everytimemydadwasrepairingsomething,he【K1】________askmetoholdthehammer,andmeanwhile,hav
陆相沉积环境的特征有哪些?
引起20世纪中国第一次历史性巨变的重大事件是()
患者女,33岁。从事园林工作,给果树喷药时不慎将农药污染衣服,农药通过接触皮肤黏膜吸收而发生中毒,此时应立即()。
项目咨询工作计划一般是由()编写完成。
学生从各种解题方法中筛选出一种最佳解法,从而得出结论,这是一种()。
下列不属于确定教育心理学研究对象需要遵循的原则是
下列各项法律规定,属于法律原则的有()(2012年非法学综合课多选第48题)
设四元齐次线性方程组(1)为而已知另一四元齐次线性方程组(2)的一个基础解系为α1=(2,-1,a+2,1)T,α2=(-1,2,4,a+8)T。(Ⅰ)求方程组(1)的一个基础解系;(Ⅱ)当a为何值时,方程组(1)与(2)
A、小明把电视机弄坏了B、电视机零件多了C、电视机零件少了D、电视机还可以用A无论零件多了还是少了,都说明电视机坏了,所以选A。
最新回复
(
0
)