首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
35
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
According to the author, all the students know that ______.
选项
A、there are great differences among the lecturers as to their quality of teaching
B、quite a lot of teachers can produce the results students desire
C、they must be inspired to learn
D、it is too dull to attend lectures
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/brlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Therewasalargewarehouse(在河对岸).
WhatwasthehightemperatureinColumbus,OhioonDecember12?Howmanycitieshadatemperaturebelow0°sometimesduringthe
Thisletterwaswrittenby______.Sincehelosthisjob______.
Globalsatellitecommunicationssystemswillbeusefulto______.Satellitetelephoneswillmake______.
AtthefirstsighttheplanetMarsdoesnotappearverywelcometoanykindoflife.Ithasverylittleoxygenandwater;thete
Thefootballmatchwastelevised______fromtheBerlinOlympicStadium.
A、coughB、thoughC、laughD、enoughB
BeijingistospenduptoUS$20billiontochangetheChinesecapitalintoa21st-centuryoneforthe2008Olympics.Theg
Mostdictionarieswilltellyouanumberof【21】aboutalanguage.Therearethreethingsinparticularthat【22】important.Theset
(79)TheOlympicGamesareheldeveryfouryearsinadifferentcityintheworld.Athletesfrommanycountriescompeteinavari
随机试题
儿童先天脑积水中症状少见的是
摩托车驶入双向行驶隧道前,应开启______。
试论支付系统应如何适应电子商务环境的新要求。
设∑是球面x2+y2+z2=a2(a>0)的内侧,则曲面积分(x2+y2+z2)dydz=_______.
国标码规定每个汉字用______个字节的二进制编码。
施工合同示范文本规定,发包人( ),不得以任何形式向分包人支付各种工程款。
下列说法中不违背物权基本原则的是()。
《中华人民共和国义务教育法》规定义务教育和基础教育阶段,学校教育必须做到“两个全面”,即()。
(2013年单选43)清末变法修律中,清廷制定了中国历史上第一部民法草案。该草案共分五编,其中由修订法律馆会同礼学馆起草的部分是()。
WhenthepoliceofficerswhotookpartintheKingbeatingwerefirstbroughtto________,theirlawyersusedthevideotapeasev
最新回复
(
0
)