首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
45
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
According to the author, all the students know that ______.
选项
A、there are great differences among the lecturers as to their quality of teaching
B、quite a lot of teachers can produce the results students desire
C、they must be inspired to learn
D、it is too dull to attend lectures
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/brlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Whathedescribedasonlya______detailIthoughtwasthemostimportantpartoftheplan.
Whenhearrivedinthatcountry,hefoundthat(therewerefewoccasionstospeakChinese).
Thefireis______,althoughthesmellofsmokeisstillstrong.
Not______(surprise),theprocessofchoosingnamesvarieswidelyfromculturetoculture.
AtthefirstsighttheplanetMarsdoesnotappearverywelcometoanykindoflife.Ithasverylittleoxygenandwater;thete
AtthefirstsighttheplanetMarsdoesnotappearverywelcometoanykindoflife.Ithasverylittleoxygenandwater;thete
Beforetheconferencebegan,aJapanesebusinessmanwasintroducedtoanAmericanbusinessmanatthelounge.TheJapanesebusine
Ireallywonder_____hehaspostedmemanypackages_____heworkedtogether.
BeijingistospenduptoUS$20billiontochangetheChinesecapitalintoa21st-centuryoneforthe2008Olympics.Theg
Todayapilotistotallydependentonwhattheairtrafficcontrolleronthegroundtellshim.Hecan’tseeenoughtobesafe.F
随机试题
火灾发生初期物质着火后,不考虑各种内外部消防措施和消防力量的干预作用,在纯自然状态下评估火灾可能引起的后果损失,这一阶段的评估称为()。
检验粪便中的寄生虫体应
某水闸启闭机房钢觞混凝土悬臂梁跨度为15m,其底模拆除时,混凝土的强度至少应达到设计强度等级的()。
根据《环境保护税法》,环境保护税的计税依据有()。
国际标准化组织规定的物流基础模数尺寸为()。
贯穿《茶馆》全剧的中心人物是()。
若两个数的平方差为19,且这两个数的和为19,那么这两个数的积是多少?()
社会保障体系的内容包括()。
请在【答题】菜单下选择【进入考生文件夹】命令,并按照题目要求完成下面的操作。注意:以下的文件必须都保存在考生文件夹下。销售部助理小工需要根据2012年和2013年的图书产品销售情况进行统计分析,以便制订新一年的销售计划和工作任务。现在,
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmuchas3%ofEarth’s【L2】______hasbeenurbanized,a
最新回复
(
0
)