首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
As more people live closer together, and as they use machines to produce leisure, they find that their leisure, and even their w
As more people live closer together, and as they use machines to produce leisure, they find that their leisure, and even their w
admin
2010-07-19
43
问题
As more people live closer together, and as they use machines to produce leisure, they find that their leisure, and even their working hours, become spoilt by a by-product of their machines--namely, noise. Noise is nowadays in the news; it has acquired political status, and public opinion is demanding, more and more insistently, that something be done about it. So it was very appropriate’ that many people professionally interested in noise control should meet to discuss their common problems at a large-scale conference. In the three days of the Conference at Teddington, 25 papers were presented; and faced with the pile of texts, whose contents ranged from sophisticated aerodynamics to general comments on the irritation expressed by neighbours, it was difficult to sort out the new ideas which remain active in one’s mind six months from now, from the big mass of valuable knowledge and facts which will remain on the shelves for reference.
This difficulty was faced by Mr. D. W. Robinson, head of the acoustics work at the National Physical Laboratory. His introduction elaborated the general idea that noise must be considered in relation to the social organism which produces it. Sound becomes annoying noise only when someone’s opinion has made it so. In terms of energy, it is an undesired byproduct, often an exceedingly small fraction of the main output of the machine or process which produces it, and correspondingly difficult to reduce significantly. To control noise is going to demand much self-discipline (annoyance arises often from lack of common courtesy and imagination), a sense of proportion (there is usually a conflict of interest if a noise is to be stopped), the expenditure of money (and it is far more economical to do this early rather than late), and, finally, technical knowledge.
Technical difficulties often arise from the subjective-objective nature of the problem. You can define the excessive speed of a motor Car in terms of a pointer reading on a speedometer. But can you define excessive noise in the same way? The results of several large-scale experiments, involving numbers of vehicles and of listeners, show how difficult it is to fix any instrumental reading as a legal limit in a way which satisfies most of the public and yet is fair to the vehicle owner. You, find, for example, that with any existing simple "noise meter", vehicles which are judged to be equally noisy by a jury may show considerable difference on the meter.
A group of papers dealt with noise, at the source--the basic origins of noise in gears, internal combustion engines, fans and jets. The prospect of a significant reduction in noise output from jet engines of the future was one of the most important questions discussed at the conference. Though the ideal cure for noise is to stop it at its source, this may in many cases be impossible. The next weapon in the anti-noise armory is to absorb it in transit to the ear.
It is a common fallacy that a sound absorbent such as glass wool is opaque to sound and is therefore the best way of diminishing annoying noise from the flat next door. In a normally furnished room, lining a wall with absorbent will have little effect on the noise level built up by reverberation; and will contribute hardly anything to the acoustic opacity of the wall. In a typical factory building, even if all available surfaces are covered with absorbent, the noise level is unlikely to drop by more than five decibels. A consultant will often recommend light partitioning, and partial screening round noisy machines, as a more of the Conference at Teddington, 25 papers were presented; and faced with the pile of texts, whose contents ranged from sophisticated aerodynamics to general comments on the irritation expressed by neighbours, it was difficult to sort out the new ideas which remain active in one’s mind six months from now, from the big mass of valuable knowledge and facts which will remain on the shelves for reference.
This difficulty was faced by Mr. D. W. Robinson, head of the acoustics work at the National Physical Laboratory. His introduction elaborated the general idea that noise must be considered in relation to the social organism which produces it. Sound becomes annoying noise only when someone’s opinion has made it so. In terms of energy, it is an undesired byproduct, often an exceedingly small fraction of the main output of the machine or process which produces it, and correspondingly difficult to reduce significantly. To control noise is going to demand much self-discipline (annoyance arises often from lack of common courtesy and imagination), a sense of proportion (there is usually a conflict of interest if a noise is to be stopped), the expenditure of money (and it is far more economical to do this early rather than late), and, finally, technical knowledge.
Technical difficulties often arise from the subjective-objective nature of the problem. You can define the excessive speed of a motor Car in terms of a pointer reading on a speedometer. But can you define excessive noise in the same way? The results of several large-scale experiments, involving numbers of vehicles and of listeners, show how difficult it is to fix any instrumental reading as a legal limit in a way which satisfies most of the public and yet is fair to the vehicle owner. You, find, for example, that with any existing simple "noise meter", vehicles which are judged to be equally noisy by a jury may show considerable difference on the meter.
A group of papers dealt with noise, at the source--the basic origins of noise in gears, internal combustion engines, fans and jets. The prospect of a significant reduction in noise output from jet engines of the future was one of the most important questions discussed at the conference. Though the ideal cure for noise is to stop it at its source, this may in many cases be impossible. The next weapon in the anti-noise armory is to absorb it in transit to the ear.
It is a common fallacy that a sound absorbent such as glass wool is opaque to sound and is therefore the best way of diminishing annoying noise from the flat next door. In a normally furnished room, lining a wall with absorbent will have little effect on the noise level built up by reverberation; and will contribute hardly anything to the acoustic opacity of the wall. In a typical factory building, even if all available surfaces are covered with absorbent, the noise level is unlikely to drop by more than five decibels. A consultant will often recommend light partitioning, and partial screening round noisy machines, as a more effective and a more economical course.
Domestic noises may perhaps be controlled by forethought and courtesy and industrial noises by good planning and technical improvement. But, if we are going to allow fast motor-cycles and heavy diesel lorries to pass continuously through residential and business property, the community as a whole must decide on the control it needs to exercise, for in the long run, it has got to pay for it. And if a nation is to take a leading part in modern air transport, it must enter into international agreements on the noise control measures it will impose at its airports and here the cost of any real control is immediately to be measured in millions of pounds.
Which of the following is true about noise control?
选项
A、Domestic noises may be controlled by good manners.
B、Industrial noises may be controlled by advancement in technology.
C、Transportation noises may be controlled by the concerted efforts of a community.
D、All of the above.
答案
D
解析
最后一段第一句指出,室内噪音可通过考虑周到和讲礼貌来控制,而工业噪音可通过良好规划和技术进步来控制,因此A和B都正确。C也正确,因为最后一段第二句提到,如果要解决交通噪音,整个社区都应该来做抉择(the community as a whole must decide on the control it needs to exercise)。C中The concerted efforts意思是“共同努力”。所以应选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/bwlO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Usuallywhendivorcing,lawsofwhichcountrymightbemostfavorabletothewifefinancially?RomeIIIisquestionedbysomep
Therearecertainlymanyteachersinauniversity,butdifferentteachersteachindifferentways.However,thereisagrowingt
Nowadays,somestudentshavedroppedoffschooltostarttheirownenterprises.Theyhavetheirownidol:BillGateswhohaslef
Onecharacteristicoftherichclassesofadecliningsocietyistheirtendencyto______.WhichofthefollowingisNOTanele
Justas【1】______isfamousforthetango,soAmerican【1】______iswell-knownforjazz,atypicalAmericaninvention
Fromanearlyage,GraceMahoney’slifewasruledbyfear.Sherecallshavingherfirstpanicattackinnurseryschool,and"it
OppositiontotheVietnamWarintheUnitedStatesdevelopedimmediatelyafterthebeginningofthewar,chieflyamongtradition
A、Hehadagoodappetiteforvariouskindsoffood.B、Hehadahabitofdrinkinglittleandmixeditwithwater.C、Hehadlost1
Ifpolicymakershopetomakefasterprogressinimprovingeconomicperformance,reducingpoverty,andslowing 【M1】______
A、theirstudieshavenotyetstartedB、theirinquirieshavereceivedgovernmentsupportC、theMatrixChurchillcaseandtheDrag
随机试题
Ibecameinterestedinwritingatanearlyage.Sowhenmyfourth-gradeteachertoldmeabouta【C1】________writer’sconferencew
A、Teachforeignlanguagesfortherestofhislife.B、Changewhathehasforhispastimaginaryworld.C、Exchangehistwo-story
有人说,工作的时候,我们要将重要事务放在主要位置,重要事务是必要条件,关系着一件事情成功与否,重要的事务没做好,一定不成功。但是,细节也是很重要的,细节是成功的充分条件,同样也与一件事情成功与否相关。一个成功的人是能够协调好重要事务与细节的关系的。如
北京甲公司与上海乙公司订立一份书面合同,甲公司签字、盖章后邮寄给乙公司签字、盖章。该合同成立的时间是()
胆囊结石声像图的描述,哪一项是错误的:
下列关于类风湿关节炎的描述,错误的是
月经不调属经乱的应配用月经不调属经早的应配用
为了防治隧道超欠挖,需要从严要求钻孔准确度,以下()要求不合理。
对苏联农业集体化政策的评价,不正确的是()。
Theystrolledaroundthelakeforanhourorso.
最新回复
(
0
)