首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
admin
2017-09-22
21
问题
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25.
For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B, C or D.
Are You Afraid of MOOCs?
Are MOOCs and other online materials a threat to quality public higher education, and to our role as professors? The members of the philosophy department at San Jose State University think so. They recently issued an open letter to Michael Sandel, a professor of Harvard University, objecting to his role in encouraging the use of MOOCs at public universities. The controversy stems from San Jose State’s contract with edX, a company that provides MOOCs, including one based on Sandel’s course on justice at Harvard. San Jose State has agreed to use materials provided by edX, but the philosophy department has refused to use Sandel’s online lectures in its courses. Though MOOCs are still new, many of the arguments presented by the San Jose State philosophy professors do not ring true in light of my experience.
We should begin by distinguishing two issues. The philosophy professors state that they have felt pressured by their administration to use the materials from Sandel’s course. The administration denies exerting any such pressure. Whatever the truth of the matter, that is an issue of academic freedom, and not about the pedagogical merits of using MOOCs and other online materials. I certainly agree that professors should be, responsible for the content and pedagogy in their own courses.
The real issue, then, is whether the availability and use of online materials, whether through MOOCs or through other channels, is a threat to quality education, especially at public universities. Many of the arguments presented in the letter presuppose an either/or, all-or-nothing approach when it comes to face-to-face versus online teaching. But the whole point of a hybrid, or blended, course is that it combines both. And it is difficult to see why it makes a great deal of difference whether the online content is delivered via a MOOC or not.
Nothing will ever replace the face-to-face discussions that occur in the classroom. But in many traditional, on-campus courses, little discussion occurs. In a lecture course with hundreds, or even just scores, of students, much of the time in the classroom is inevitably spent with the professor lecturing and the students(hopefully)taking notes-or at least listening attentively. In courses with a significant lecture component, the advantages of using online lectures are undeniable. I know from my own experience that, if my attention wanes for a few moments, it is very convenient to simply go back and play a portion again. One can do the same if one doesn’t quite understand something the first time. And one need not miss material to take a bathroom break.
The availability of high-quality online lectures is an opportunity to rethink how we spend our time in the classroom. If an online lecture presents the material, or walks students through an argument, we are freed to spend more time discussing the aspects of the material that are most difficult-or most interesting. We can do other kinds of activities that we might not have time for if we felt obliged to present the material in the traditional way. Yes, hybrid courses usually involve less face-to-face time, but that time can be better and more effectively spent.
The crucial thing is that
the instructor remains in the driver’s seat
-and that takes us back to academic freedom. As long as individual professors are choosing what material to assign or recommend, running their in-class discussions and adding material that they think is not adequately covered in the online lectures, choosing the assignments and tests, and grading those tests, there is no threat to the professoriate, or to the quality of education at universities, public or otherwise.
The underlined part of the last paragraph indicates that the role of professors is______.
选项
A、to learn how to drive vehicles
B、to design and manage the course
C、to control everything in the classroom
D、to develop and offer their own online courses
答案
B
解析
划线的句子采用比喻的修辞手法,说明教师应像司机开车一样设计并管理好课程,而不是A选项的学习开车,或C选项的掌控课堂的一切,D选项更没有提及,因此选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/c59d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
HereisaletterfromColoradoStateUniversitytoinformtheapplicantMr.LithathehasbeenadmittedtoCognitivePsychology
HereisaletterfromColoradoStateUniversitytoinformtheapplicantMr.LithathehasbeenadmittedtoCognitivePsychology
HereisaletterfromColoradoStateUniversitytoinformtheapplicantMr.LithathehasbeenadmittedtoCognitivePsychology
Youareaskedtowriteacompositioninwhichyougiveyourownopinionsonthefollowingtopic:Tea
HereisaletterwhichcomplainsaboutthequalityoftheTVsetboughtinastore.Readtheletterandcompletethegiveninfor
HereisanadvertisementaboutaBusinessBookClub.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethegiveninformationform.Wri
YougotaletterrequestinginformationfromAndrewPhilips,themarketingmanagerofLinguaServicesLtd.
HereisanadvertisementaboutforacertainpositioninthenewspaperofDec.7,2005.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethe
HereisanadvertisementaboutforacertainpositioninthenewspaperofDec.7,2005.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethe
随机试题
智力测验的种类。
Thereislittleneedformarketingintheplacesuchasasubsistencefarm,because______.Accordingtothepassagetheactivi
对暗适应的叙述,不正确的是
患者男性,58岁。患者半年前登山时出现心前区疼痛,为压迫样,持续1~2分钟并向左肩、左背放射,停止活动自行缓解。以后每当劳累和工作紧张均可诱发,含硝酸甘油可缓解。一月前心前区疼痛发作频繁并加重,发作时间较前延长,轻微活动就可诱发,含硝酸甘油效果欠佳。发现高
典型预激综合征是由哪条附加传导束引起的?()
外资企业所得税税率设计的原则中,采用比例税率的优点是()。
2008年奥运会期间,全世界将有1万多名运动员到北京参加比赛,还有各国官员、记者、观众、游客,北京将成为一个“国际村”。让外国友人在北京有宾至如归的感觉,首先就要创建一个良好的语言环境。从2004年5月到现在,迎奥运“北京市民讲外语”志愿服务活动已经招募了
2,3,5,7,12,15,(),()
有条理地概述这些资料所反映的主要内容,字数不超过200字。要求:全面,有条理,有层次。用不超过350字的篇幅,提出解决给定资料所反映问题的方案。要有条理地说明,要体现针对性和可行性。
微分方程(x2-1)dy+(2xy-cosx)dx=0满足初始条件y(0)=1的特解为________。
最新回复
(
0
)