首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
admin
2017-09-22
17
问题
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25.
For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B, C or D.
Are You Afraid of MOOCs?
Are MOOCs and other online materials a threat to quality public higher education, and to our role as professors? The members of the philosophy department at San Jose State University think so. They recently issued an open letter to Michael Sandel, a professor of Harvard University, objecting to his role in encouraging the use of MOOCs at public universities. The controversy stems from San Jose State’s contract with edX, a company that provides MOOCs, including one based on Sandel’s course on justice at Harvard. San Jose State has agreed to use materials provided by edX, but the philosophy department has refused to use Sandel’s online lectures in its courses. Though MOOCs are still new, many of the arguments presented by the San Jose State philosophy professors do not ring true in light of my experience.
We should begin by distinguishing two issues. The philosophy professors state that they have felt pressured by their administration to use the materials from Sandel’s course. The administration denies exerting any such pressure. Whatever the truth of the matter, that is an issue of academic freedom, and not about the pedagogical merits of using MOOCs and other online materials. I certainly agree that professors should be, responsible for the content and pedagogy in their own courses.
The real issue, then, is whether the availability and use of online materials, whether through MOOCs or through other channels, is a threat to quality education, especially at public universities. Many of the arguments presented in the letter presuppose an either/or, all-or-nothing approach when it comes to face-to-face versus online teaching. But the whole point of a hybrid, or blended, course is that it combines both. And it is difficult to see why it makes a great deal of difference whether the online content is delivered via a MOOC or not.
Nothing will ever replace the face-to-face discussions that occur in the classroom. But in many traditional, on-campus courses, little discussion occurs. In a lecture course with hundreds, or even just scores, of students, much of the time in the classroom is inevitably spent with the professor lecturing and the students(hopefully)taking notes-or at least listening attentively. In courses with a significant lecture component, the advantages of using online lectures are undeniable. I know from my own experience that, if my attention wanes for a few moments, it is very convenient to simply go back and play a portion again. One can do the same if one doesn’t quite understand something the first time. And one need not miss material to take a bathroom break.
The availability of high-quality online lectures is an opportunity to rethink how we spend our time in the classroom. If an online lecture presents the material, or walks students through an argument, we are freed to spend more time discussing the aspects of the material that are most difficult-or most interesting. We can do other kinds of activities that we might not have time for if we felt obliged to present the material in the traditional way. Yes, hybrid courses usually involve less face-to-face time, but that time can be better and more effectively spent.
The crucial thing is that
the instructor remains in the driver’s seat
-and that takes us back to academic freedom. As long as individual professors are choosing what material to assign or recommend, running their in-class discussions and adding material that they think is not adequately covered in the online lectures, choosing the assignments and tests, and grading those tests, there is no threat to the professoriate, or to the quality of education at universities, public or otherwise.
The underlined part of the last paragraph indicates that the role of professors is______.
选项
A、to learn how to drive vehicles
B、to design and manage the course
C、to control everything in the classroom
D、to develop and offer their own online courses
答案
B
解析
划线的句子采用比喻的修辞手法,说明教师应像司机开车一样设计并管理好课程,而不是A选项的学习开车,或C选项的掌控课堂的一切,D选项更没有提及,因此选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/c59d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
Writeanessayabout120wordsonthefollowingtopic:DoesEveryoneNeedtoGotoCollege?
Writeaboutthefollowingtopic:Technologygivesyoungpeopletodayknowledgeandpowerthattheyhaveneverhadbefore.Th
HereisaletterfromColoradoStateUniversitytoinformtheapplicantMr.LithathehasbeenadmittedtoCognitivePsychology
HereisaletterfromColoradoStateUniversitytoinformtheapplicantMr.LithathehasbeenadmittedtoCognitivePsychology
YougotaletterfromJimGreen,apersonworkingatthemarketingdepartmentofacompany.
HereisaletterwhichcomplainsaboutthequalityoftheTVsetboughtinastore.Readtheletterandcompletethegiveninfor
HereisaletterwhichcomplainsaboutthequalityoftheTVsetboughtinastore.Readtheletterandcompletethegiveninfor
Lookatthefollowingstatement:Beingcreativeisthekeytocareersuccess.Doyouagreeordisagreew
Readthefollowingletterandcompletethegiveninformationform.Writeaword,phraseornumberinthespaces1-5.De
随机试题
A/属烃类基质B/属水溶性基质C/属类脂类基质D/油脂类基质E/二属硅酮类基质二甲硅油
护理文档的书写原则不包括
行业主管部门规定由()编制竣工图的,可在新图中采用竣工图标。
施工项目的( )是以货币形式编制项目计划期内的生产费用、成本水平、成本降低率以及相应措施与规划的书面方案。
填筑沿河浸水路堤较适合的填料有()。
计算土地增值税时,下列说法正确的有()
从抗生素的发现、应用和不断升级,到研制新一代抗生素的探索,同时重新寻找健康和自然的疗法。人类为战胜病菌引起的疾病所作的努力表明()。①实践为认识创造出崭新的工具,提高人的认识能力②实践不断地为认识提出新的课题,推动认识发展
下列关于音乐教学目标的理解不正确的是()。
在某国的总统竞选中,争取连任的现任总统声言:“本届政府执政期间,失业率降低了两个百分点,可见本届政府的施政纲领是正确的。”如果下列哪项为真。则能有力地削弱以上的申辩?
进程出现饥饿现象是指()。
最新回复
(
0
)