首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business. For each question 15—20, mark one letter(A,
Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business. For each question 15—20, mark one letter(A,
admin
2013-08-22
30
问题
Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business.
For each question 15—20, mark one letter(A, B. C, or D)on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Since the days of Henry Ford’s dominance of the car market in the 1920s up to the present day, the car industry has continued to grow. Some companies, such as British Leyland, failed to survive the turbulent business world of the 1970s despite being government-owned. During the 1960s and 1970s, as growth in profit became more difficult to achieve due to increased competition, mainly from the Japanese, the industry turned to efficient production methods in order to create a competitive advantage. However, once all the major players in the industry had become as efficient as possible, developing a cost advantage was more difficult to achieve. In addition, car companies from Asia, such as Daewoo, Samsung and Kia, have developed cheaper, more affordable alternatives for the discerning western buyers. Such car companies are part-funded by their respective governments but enjoy considerably lower labor costs.
Increasing productive capacity has led to car companies aiming to use economies of scale as the main way of reducing cost, although this has unfortunately led to businesses having surplus capacity. This spare capacity occurs when the industry as a whole expands ahead of, or in anticipation of, a growth in customer demand. Such growth in capacity has meant that supply outstrips demand by some 30% , i.e. , car companies could cut back on their capacity levels by 30%, and still meet all customer demands.
The result has been a series of joint agreements and mergers between car companies, with a view to either using capacity, or losing capacity altogether by selling off parts of a business. The other problem is the high cost of developing new vehicles: the standard response to the high cost is to either rejuvenate or re-launch old vehicles with new technology. But there are enough companies developing new models that any business, which does not, stands to lose out. The main fear in the car industry is over-capacity—experts predict that by 2001, the industry may produce 23 million cars more than it can sell!
In 1998 there was a spate of company mergers—e.g. In January 1999, Ford paid £4 billion for Volvo’s car division(Volvo claimed that it needed economies of scale, allowing it to focus on buses, engines and aerospace and to acquire shares in two major truck-making businesses. Ford intended to distribute Volvos with its own cars and hoped to use Volvo’s reputation for technological excellence to develop new cars, using common research platforms to save money.
Renault, on the other hand, announced a joint agreement with Nissan, the debt-ridden Japanese company, to purchase a 37% stake. For Renault, the problem was not over-capacity, but rather the lack of product range. Renault was 44% owned by the French government, which obviously wanted to protect one of its major companies and wealth creators. However, Renault had concentrated its major marketing effort on domestic demand in Francejas the domestic market fell, profit tumbled. The expiry in 1999 of the "gentlemen’s agreement" which limited car sales from Japan was probably the main reason for teaming up with Nissan. Nissan, however, had borrowed approximately £ 15 billion in order to expand its productive capacity and had lost money in six of the last seven years. One estimate put 1998’s losses at nearly £ 1 billion. The cost savings for both companies are not likely to occur until 2002, resulting mainly from purchasing economies of scale. Renault seems to have got caught between the large manufacturers who achieve economies of scale and the smaller specialist manufacturers.
What is the main reason for Renault’s joint agreement with Nissan?
选项
A、The expiry of the "gentlemen’s agreement".
B、Because Renault wanted to help Nissan out of the hard situation.
C、Because Nissan had very good reputation for technological excellence.
D、Because Renault was 44% owned by the French government.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/cC7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Lookatthegraphic.Whatcolorpaintwillthewomanmostlikelychoose?
Iscapitalmarketimportantornot?Why?Canyougiveexplanationaboutit?
Askingquestions征询
Tellingyouraudiencethattheycanaskquestions请听众提问
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
TaskOne-Job•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listedA-H.•Foreachextract,choosethejobeachsp
TaskOne-Job•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listedA-H.•Foreachextract,choosethejobeachsp
•YouwillheararadiointerviewbetweenawomanjournalistandMichaelDell,ChairmanofDellInc.andhisnewCEO,KevinRolli
随机试题
在对钢管进行喷涂内减阻涂料时,扇幅最高搭接为()。
根据企业会计准则的规定,我国企业利润表采用()结构。
下列不属于收入政策的范畴的是()。
根据公司法律制度的规定,下列关于股份有限公司股份转让限制的表述中,不正确的是()。
个人因从事彩票代销业务而取得所得,应按照“个体工商户的生产、经营所得”项目计征个人所得税。()
一般资料:求助者,男性,56岁,国家某部委巡视员。案例介绍:求助者原是某部局长,由于年龄的原因,半年前改任非领导职务。原来每天非常繁忙,总有处理不完的事情。现在自己分管的事情明显比以前少了。对新局长的思想有些不理解,但又不好干涉别人的工作,心里很不
党的十八大首次提出“倡导富强、民主、文明、和谐,倡导自由、平等、公正、法治,倡导爱国、敬业、诚信、友善,积极培育社会主义核心价值观”。其中立足社会层面提出的要求是
具体来说,UML的语义是定义在一个四层建模概念框架中的,这四层分别是:【1】、元模型层、模型层和【2】。
计算机采用的最基本电子元件具有两个状态,这也是最简单易行的方法。例如,只有开和关的电子状态,导通和截止的晶体管,不同极性的磁性元件等。为了适应计算机内部的电子电路,我们把这两种状态分别定义为“0”和“1”,采用“二进制”这样一种特殊的形式来表示,二进制的口
Somesayitisevidentthatcomputerscandamageaperson’seyesight.Sincethepopularityofcomputersbegantoskyrocket,ther
最新回复
(
0
)