首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Between 1986 and 1992 in the United States, mortality due to coronary heart disease among white men 45 to 74 years of age decrea
Between 1986 and 1992 in the United States, mortality due to coronary heart disease among white men 45 to 74 years of age decrea
admin
2011-01-06
79
问题
Between 1986 and 1992 in the United States, mortality due to coronary heart disease among white men 45 to 74 years of age decreased by 26 percent, continuing a trend that began in the mid-1960s. Americans are thus doing something right. But did fish consumption help? This is where the Health Professionals Follow-Up(起作用) Study comes in.
The study deals with the intake(摄影) of n-3 fatty acids and fish. The researchers calculated the intake of fish for 44,895 male health professionals—most of them dentists—in 1986 and kept track of their health status for the next six years. Surprisingly, the intake of n-3 fatty acids or fish in 1986 was not related to the risk of subsequent coronary disease. The number of participants was much larger than in other studies, and the methods and data analysis were solid. Also, measurements of fatty acids in adipose tissue showed that the questionnaire reliably ranked respondents according to their intake of 3 fatty acids.
The researchers carefully spell out the limitations of the study. First, two thirds of the men had greatly increased their intake of fish over the 10 years before 1986. Some of those increases could have occurred. Shortly before the base-line investigation in 1986, because the inverse relation between fish consumption and mortality due to coronary heart disease was first reported in 1985. Thus, data on fish intake may not reflect long term habits, and changes in fish intake during follow-up could also have attenuated an association with coronary disease. The authors performed separate analyses including only men who reported no change in their fish intake and again found no effect. However, it is hard for people to recall whether they changed their diet several years ago.
Second, the fish intake of these educated men was high and was more comparable with that of Norwegians or Japanese than with intake in the U.S. men studied previously. The epidemiologic data suggest that any beneficial effect is obtained with one or two servings of fish per week and that more is not better. Moreover, previous studies of fish intake have shown an association with the rate of mortality due to coronary disease, rather than with the incidence of nonfatal coronaty disease or coronary surgery. When seen in that light, there is some agreement between the present study and previous reports, because the risk of death from coronariy heart disease was about 25 percent lower among men who ate at least some fish than among those who ate no fish at all.
A third limitation of the study was that some of the men studied may have begun to eat fish, or may have eaten more, because they thought that they were at increased risk of a heart attack;the men in the highest 20 percent of the study group in terms of their in-take of n-3 fatty acids more frequently reported a family history of coronary disease or a personal history of high cholesterol levels than men who ate less fish.
The Harvard investigators concluded that increasing fish intake beyond one or two servings per week is unlikely to reduce the risk of coronary events substantially in men who are initially free of coronary disease. This is a prudent conclusion, and it could be extended to fish-oil capsules, which provide n-3 fatty acids in much larger amounts than are commonly consumed in food.
The findings of the Health Professionals Follow-up Study should somewhat dampen enthusiasm for fish and fish oil as a panacea against coronary disease. A little fish may still do some good, but more fish is not necessarily better.
According to the text, the intake of fish in 1986 was related to the risk of subsequent coronary disease.
选项
A、Right
B、Wrong
C、Not mentioned
答案
B
解析
见第二段“Surprisingly,the intake of n-3 fatty acids or fish in 1986 was not related to the risk of subsequent coronary disease.”令人吃惊的是,1986年的n-3脂肪酸或鱼的摄入量与随后的冠心病发病率无关。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/cEmd777K
本试题收录于:
职称英语卫生类B级题库职称英语分类
0
职称英语卫生类B级
职称英语
相关试题推荐
Ifyouintendusinghumorinyourtalktomakepeoplesmile,youmustknowhowtoidentifysharedexperiencesandproblems.Your
Rewardsandpunishmentsareusedindifferentwaysbydifferentcommunitiestomaintainsocialorderandpreserveculturalvalue
IntheUnitedStates,itisimportanttobepunctualforanappointment,aclass,ameeting,etc.Thismaynotbetrueinallco
1.Television—thatmostpervasiveandpersuasiveofmoderntechnologies,markedbyrapidchangeandsophisticationandversati
Youwillheartwoconversations.Writedownonewordornumberinthenumberedspacesontheformsbelow.CONVERSATION1(Que
OrderingRoomServiceRoomNo.:【L5】______Whatfordinner:twofreshJuices,oneorangeandone【L6】______,tworoastbeefsandw
OrderingRoomServiceRoomNo.:【L5】______Whatfordinner:twofreshJuices,oneorangeandone【L6】______,tworoastbeefsandw
AHealthProfileAhealthprofileisaportraitofallofthefactorsthatinfluenceyourhealth.Todrawyourhealthprofile,y
BeesandColourOnourtableinthegardenweputabluecard,andallaroundthisbluecardweputanumberofdifferentgr
Manycitydwellersareturningvacantlotsintothrivinggardens.
随机试题
设函数F(x)的定义域为[-1,1],则函数g(x)=f(x+1)+f(sinx)的定义域为__________.
两样本比较时下列哪种情况第二类错误最小
慢性牙槽脓肿X线片常显示慢性根尖肉芽肿的X线表现为
扩张型心肌病的主要临床表现是
×年8月6日18时,驾驶员甲驾驶装满液氯的槽罐车驶入某高速公路B56段,20时许,槽罐车与驾驶员乙驾驶的货车相撞,导致槽罐车被撞坏,槽罐破裂,液氯泄露,造成除驾驶员甲之外的两车其他人员全部死亡。撞车事故发生后,驾驶员甲不顾槽罐车严重损坏,液氯已开始外泄的危
下列选项属于增值税征收范围生活服务类的有()。
围绕治安问题开展的社会教育,是维护社会治安的()。
材料一:在中世纪,人类意识的两个方面——内心自省和外界观察都一样——一直处于一层共同的纱幕之下,处于睡眠或半醒状态。这层纱幕是由信仰、幻想和幼稚的偏见织成的,透过它向外看,世界和历史都罩上了一层奇怪的色彩……在意大利,这层纱幕最先烟消云散。——布克
马克思主义在实践中产生,并在实践中不断丰富和发展。其中,马克思主义最显著的特点是()
在数据管理技术的发展过程中,经历了人工管理阶段、文件系统阶段和数据库系统阶段。其中数据独立性最高的阶段是______。
最新回复
(
0
)