首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warming against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warming against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
admin
2012-10-23
64
问题
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warming against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one story fits all of Asia. This is, of course, silly: all of these economies plunged into economic crisis within a few months of each other, so they must have had something in common.
In fact, the logic of catastrophe was pretty much the same in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. (Japan is a very different story.) In each case investors-mainly, but not entirely, foreign banks who had made short-term loans-all tried to pull their money out at the same time. The result was a combined banking and currency crisis a banking crisis because no bank can convert all its assets into cash on short notice; a currency crisis because panicked investors were trying not only to convert long-term assets into cash, but to concert baht or rupiah into dollars. In the face of the stampede, governments had no good options. If they let their currencies plunge, inflation would soar and companies that had borrowed in dollars would go bankrupt; if they tried to support their currencies by pushing up interest rates, the same firms would probable go bust from the combination of debt burden and recession. In practice, countries split the difference and paid a heavy price regardless.
Was the crisis a punishment for bad economic management? Like most clich6s, the catchphrase "crony capitalism" has prospered because it gets at something real; excessively cozy relationships between government and business really did lead to a lot of bad investments. The still primitive financial structure of Asian business also mad the economies peculiarly vulnerable to loss of confidence. But the punishment was surely disproportionate to the crime, and many investments that look foolish in retrospect seemed sensible at the time.
Given that there were no good policy options, was the policy response mainly on the right track? There was frantic blame-shifting when everything in Asia seemed to be going wrong: now there is a race to claim credit when some things have started to go right The International Monetary Fund points to Korea’s recovery-and more generally to the fact that the sky didn’t fall after all-as proof that its policy recommendations were right Never mind that other IMF clients have done far worse, and that the economy of Malaysia-which refused IMF help, and horrified respectable opinion by imposing capital controls-also seems to be on the mend; Malaysia’s Prime Minister, by contrast, claims full credit for any good news-even though neighboring economies also seem to have bottomed out
The truth is that an observer without any ax to grind would probably conclude that none of the policies adopted either on or in defiance of the IMF’s advice made much difference either way. Budget policies, interest ate policies, banking reform-whatever countries tried, just about all the capital that could flee, did. And when there was no more money to run, the natural recuperative powers of the economies finally began to prevail. At best, the money doctors who purported to offer cures provided a helpful bedside manner, at worst, they were like medieval physicians who prescribed bleeding as a remedy for all ills.
Will the patients stage a full recovery? It depends on exactly what you mean by "full". South Korea’s industrial production is already above its pre-crisis level, but in the spring of 1997 anyone who had predicted zero growth in Korea industry over the next two years would have been regarded as a reckless doomsayer. So if by recovery you mean not just a return to growth, but one that brings the region’s performance back to something like what people used to regard as the Asian norm, they have a long way to go.
The writer thinks that those Asian countries______.
选项
A、well deserved the punishment
B、invested in a senseless way at the time
C、were unduly punished in the crisis.
D、had bad relationships between government and business.
答案
C
解析
根据本文第三段后面的“But the punishment was surely disproportionate to the crime”可知,作者认为那些亚洲国家遭受的惩罚是过重的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/cG9O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Thekidsarehangingout.Theyarenotoldenoughforjobs.Noraretheyrichenoughforcamp.Theyareschoolchildrenwithout
Therearealotofchoicesyouhavetomakeinyourlifeandsomeeventsorchangesthathaveoccurredbecauseofthem.Inthef
Thetermswadandfrogrefertotwodifferentanimalsbelongingtodifferentgenuses,andcarefulstudents______thetwo.
Theunfortunatedeathofthegeniuspoetcaused______losstothiscountry.
Uponreachinganappropriateage(usuallybetween18and21years),childrenareencouraged,butnotforced,to"leavethenest"
Theoppositeofadaptivedivergenceisaninterestingandfairlycommonexpressionofevolution.Whereasrelatedgroupsoforgan
DanisHayesraisedtheessentialparadoxandaskedhowpeoplecouldhavefoughtsohardagainstenvironmentaldegradation______
Theconceptofpersonalchoiceinrelationtohealthbehaviorsisanimportantone.Anestimated90percentofallillnessesmay
Insciencethemeaningoftheword"explain"sufferswithcivilization’severystepinsearchofreality.Sciencecannotreally
Inthelongrunagovernmentwillalwaysencroachuponfreedomtotheextenttowhichithasthepowertodoso.Thisisalmost
随机试题
从科学社会主义一般原则出发,无产阶级的历史使命是()
试述沟通的分类。
下列服药时时间,正确的是
急黄的最主要病机是
属于季铵碱的是
职业健康安全管理体系和环境管理体系运行中的实施重点是围绕()等开展活动。
个人商用房贷款的还款来源主要是()。[2010年5月真题]
美国是一个移民国家,学校的学生来自不同的种族与家庭,通过接受系统的学校教育,学生掌握现代文化知识,建立独特的族群和阶层文化,社会也因此充满生机与活力。这主要体现了教育的()
定义:①接近权:指大众即社会的每一个成员都有接近、利用媒介发表意见、观点的自由权利,实际上是通过新闻媒介而实现的表达权。②更正权:指当与己有关的报道出现错误时,当事者拥有要求同一传媒予以更正或登载反驳文章的权利。③知晓权:
下面哪一条指令不能使进位标志CF置“0”?
最新回复
(
0
)