首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On October 31, a newborn baby somewhere in the world will become the 7 billionth member of the human race. Or so says the UN—alt
On October 31, a newborn baby somewhere in the world will become the 7 billionth member of the human race. Or so says the UN—alt
admin
2015-03-29
34
问题
On October 31, a newborn baby somewhere in the world will become the 7 billionth member of the human race. Or so says the UN—alternatively, this date could be at least a year too early. Behind the UN’s certainty may lay outdated and unreliable census data. The suspicion is that millions of births and deaths have not been counted and there is huge uncertainty about the rate at which women are giving birth. The precise "day of 7 billion" may not matter much. But the inaccuracies(不精确)make it harder to answer a more important question: is human population set to peak within the next few decades or will it carry on growing beyond that?
Wolfgang Lutz of the Vienna Institute of Demography says the UN is "under political pressure to disregard(忽视)uncertainty and name a date" for 7 billion. But he and colleague Sergei Scherbov estimate that the world probably won’t reach 7 billion until early in 2013, though it could be as late as 2020. The director of the UN population division Hania Zlotnik defends her data but agrees that "an interval of a few months or even a year would be a reasonable range of uncertainty".
One problem for demographers(人口统计学家)is undercounting. Even developed countries calculate their censuses miss up to 3 percent of people. Up-to-date figures have to adjust for both of this and the changes since the last census, which could be decades in the case of some African countries. So adjusting for extra people is routine. The big danger, Scherbov says, may be over-adjusting. The world has seen a dramatic decline in fertility in recent years, with the average woman now having only 2. 5 children, half as many as her grandmother 50 years ago. So there may be far fewer new arrivals than demographers assume.
Questions:
In Wolfgang Lutz’s opinion, why does the UN disregard uncertainty and name a date for 7 billion?
选项
答案
Because the UN is under political pressure.
解析
由题干中的Wolfgang Lutz和the UNdisregard uncertainty定位到第二段第一句.由句意可以判断,联合国忽略数据的不确定性并对70亿人口确定一个日期是源于政治方面的压力。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/cI5K777K
本试题收录于:
浙江省大学英语三级题库大学英语三级分类
0
浙江省大学英语三级
大学英语三级
相关试题推荐
NewresearchshowsthatcleanersaresomeofthehappiestworkersinBritain,【C1】al______withchildcaters,medicalsecretarie
WhenIwasachild,myfamilyusedtogoonholidayeveryyeartovisitourrelativesinthenorth-eastofEngland.Oneofthem
FluandHowNottoCatchItThiswinter,inofficesandworkplacesthroughoutthecountry,peopleareatriskofbecominga
Cricket,althoughlovedbymillionsofpeople,isnotoneoftheeasiestsportstounderstand.Indeed,thegamehaslotsofsubt
Feedbackmatters.Whetherwearetryingtofindourwaytoanewfriend’shouse,aimingtoimproveourperformanceonthegolf
Formostofhumanhistory,thedominantconcernsaboutenergyhascentered【M1】________onthebenefitside.Inadequacyofenergy
A、Hewantedsomegreenbeans.B、Hewantedabigsteak.C、Hewantedsomecakeandcoffee.D、Hewantedlotsofpotatoes.C他还需要一杯咖
Hewearsapairofsunglasses______(唯恐别人认出他来).
DearBrainStoreCustomer,Wehopeyouenjoyedbooksandotheritemsincludedinourcatalogue(目录).Whetheryou’reateacher
A、Hedoesn’tcaremuchaboutit.B、Heenjoyeditverymuch.C、Hedoesn’tmindeventhoughit’stedious.D、Hehatesworkingovert
随机试题
在2000年国家环保总局颁布的“关于发布《环境空气质量标准》(GB3095—1996)修改单的通知”,修改单中NO2的二级标准的日平均浓度限值变为()ms/m3。
A安装公司承包某大楼的建筑电气工程施工。工程内容有地下变电所、配电干线、室内配线、照明系统。合同约定:主要设备(三相电力变压器、成套配电柜)由业主采购,其他设备及材料由A安装公司采购。大楼的一次结构已完工,大楼的二次结构、装饰工程由B建筑公司承包施工。
为了减少债券基金带来的通货膨胀风险,债券基金的投资者可以适当地购买一些股票基金。()
以券融资的回购交易申报方向为买入,申报价格为每元资金日收益率。( )
我国原《义务教育法》和新修订的《义务教育法》开始实施的时间分别是()。
有人说,中国的发展靠“人口红利”已经没有什么空间了,今后,中国的发展要靠“改革红利”,你怎么看?
在Excel2007中,工作表的列标用()表示。
Youmaysaythatthebusinessofmarkingbooksisgoingtoslowdownyourreading.【C1】______probablywill.That’soneofthe【C2】
Theneedforsolarelectricityisclear.Itissafe,ecologicallysound,efficient,continuouslyavailable,andithasnomoving
Theregularuseoftextmessagesande-mailscanlowertheIQmorethantwiceasmuchassmokingmarijuana.Thatistheclaimof
最新回复
(
0
)