首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2013-05-10
23
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"—especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramaticj much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, American lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
In Britain, newspapers______.
选项
A、do the same as American newspapers do
B、are not interested in publishing details about the trial before it takes place
C、are not allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
D、are allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
答案
C
解析
文中作者在第四段第二句和第三句谈到,英美两国在受理重刑案件时一个最显著的区别是:美国法律并不阻止报纸和电视在庭审前对这类案件的大肆渲染。由此可见,在审理重刑案件之前,英国法律是不允许报纸报道任何细节的。因此这道题的正确答案应当为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/cYxd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Whydidtheartificiallanguagesappear?
【61】ScientistsatJohnsHopkinshavediscovered"striking"differencesbetweenmenandwomeninapartofthebrainlinkedwith
Accordingtothewoman,howmuchmoneyshouldpeoplesaveforthemselves?
Somepeoplebelievethatinternationalsportcreatesgoodwillbetweenthenationsandthatifcountriesplaygamestogetherthey
BillGates,thebillionaireMicrosoftchairmanwithoutasingleearneduniversitydegree,isbyhissuccessraisingnewdoubtsa
Wheredoesthismonologuetakeplace?______.
Runningafeverwasoncethoughttobetheprerogativeofwarm-bloodedcreatures,whoseinternaltemperaturesareindependentof
Jewish从给出的信息(GermanyofJewishnationality)可以判断答案是Jewish,此外,文中说1938年他到了美国,所以可以猜测他不是美国人,这个信息可以辅助我们确定正确答案。注意民族、国籍等需要用形容词形式。
showers
Whatmustyoumakesurewhenyouloadthecassette?
随机试题
若国家公务员降职过程中发生争议,解决的途径有()
盐酸异丙基肾上腺素为
消防产品是指专门用于()的产品。
某商贸公司2015年12月转让一栋旧办公楼,合同中注明转让收入为2000万元。因无法取得评估价格,商贸公司提供了购房发票,该办公楼系2011年3月购入,购入原价为1000万元,另缴纳契税30万元,能够提供契税完税凭证。已知转让旧办公楼时缴纳相关税费54万元
选项四个图形中,只有一个是由题干四个图形拼合而成的,请选出来。
神经系统最基本的结构和功能单位是()。
《刑法》第386条规定:“对犯受贿罪的,根据受贿所得数额及情节,依照本法第三百八十三条的规定处罚。”该条规定的法定刑属于
设方程求常数a.
设f(x)=在(-∞,+∞)内连续,且f(x)=0,则().
FlorenceNightingaleenteredthehospitalandwasappalledandhorrifiedbywhatshesaw.Woundedsoldierslayonstrawmatstha
最新回复
(
0
)