首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2013-05-10
25
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"—especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramaticj much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, American lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
In Britain, newspapers______.
选项
A、do the same as American newspapers do
B、are not interested in publishing details about the trial before it takes place
C、are not allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
D、are allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
答案
C
解析
文中作者在第四段第二句和第三句谈到,英美两国在受理重刑案件时一个最显著的区别是:美国法律并不阻止报纸和电视在庭审前对这类案件的大肆渲染。由此可见,在审理重刑案件之前,英国法律是不允许报纸报道任何细节的。因此这道题的正确答案应当为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/cYxd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
states
TherearesomesocialproblemsintheUnitedStates.Anddrugabusehascometobe【21】______asoneofthemostchallengingsoc
Duringthe1980s,unemploymentandunderemploymentinsomecountrieswasashighas90percent.Somecountriesdidnot【21】_____
Inthelateyearsofthenineteenthcentury,"capital"and"labour"wereenlargingandperfectingtheirrivalorganizationsonm
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreallygoodscienceitisimpossibletopredict.Ifthethi
Whenwillshowersreachsouth-westEnglandandthesoutherncoastofWales?
HowmanyemailmessagesdidAmericanssendin1999?
AlthoughCoca-ColaCo.spentnearly$2billionlastyearadvertisingitsvariousbrandsaroundtheglobe,itsawitsshareoft
Whenwillshowersreachsouth-westEnglandandthesoutherncoastofWales?
Whatmustyoumakesurewhenyouloadthecassette?
随机试题
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteanessayentitledTooMuchConsiderationforChildrenDoesNoGood.Youressa
在Excel中,当实现了工作薄的初次保存以后,对工作簿文件进行修改后的保存可按组合键()来实现。
关于腰椎间盘突出症下列说法正确的是()
某公司十年来一直只生产空调,产品质量较好,经营状况良好。2011年该公司与某空调元器件企业并购,拟生产三种不同型号的空调产品,销路好、销路一般、销路差的概率分别为0.3、0.5、0.2。有四个备选方案,每个方案的投资额、经营期限和收益值如下表所示:根据
下列可表明事件A、B相互独立的是()。
(1)看见野人身影(2)进入森林(3)寻找野人(4)带好装备(5)没有结果
(对外经贸2013)在全球金融危机余波未了,欧美经济仍在衰退边缘挣扎的时候,巴塞尔银行监管委员会于2010年底通过了《巴塞尔协议Ⅲ》,成为2008年金融危机后首个全球范围内的重镑监管改革产物。针对《巴塞尔协议Ⅲ》的出台,业内议论纷纷,请根据你的理解,回答以
法律与道德、宗教、风俗习惯、社会礼仪等其他社会规范的本质区别在于
有如下语句:s=Int(100*Rnd)执行完毕后,s的值是()。
Lavoitureenroulantdanslecaniveaua______lespassants.
最新回复
(
0
)