首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2013-05-10
20
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"—especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramaticj much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, American lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
In Britain, newspapers______.
选项
A、do the same as American newspapers do
B、are not interested in publishing details about the trial before it takes place
C、are not allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
D、are allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
答案
C
解析
文中作者在第四段第二句和第三句谈到,英美两国在受理重刑案件时一个最显著的区别是:美国法律并不阻止报纸和电视在庭审前对这类案件的大肆渲染。由此可见,在审理重刑案件之前,英国法律是不允许报纸报道任何细节的。因此这道题的正确答案应当为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/cYxd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
InwhatwayarestrikesinBritaindifferentfromthoseinotherEuropeancountries?
Perhaps,everywomanstillrememberthisfamoussaying,"Nowomancanbetoorichortoothin."Thissayingoftenattributedto
Duringthe1980s,unemploymentandunderemploymentinsomecountrieswasashighas90percent.Somecountriesdidnot【21】_____
Duringthe1980s,unemploymentandunderemploymentinsomecountrieswasashighas90percent.Somecountriesdidnot【21】_____
Manypeoplecanrememberfeelingverylonelywhentheywere
HowmanyzonesistheLondonundergroundnetworkdividedinto?
Wheredoesthismonologuetakeplace?______.
HotelswereamongtheearliestfacilitiesthatboundtheUnitedStatestogether.Theywere.bothcreaturesandcreatorsofcommu
Sailorsandfishermeninparticular,havealwaysbeenextremelysuperstitious.Thisishardlysurprisingwhenoneconsidersthe
showers
随机试题
A.3-磷酸甘油酸B.α-酮戊二酸C.二者均是D.二者均非
A.TTGACAB.TATAATC.TATAD.AATAAA真核生物启动子的核心序列是
一位慢性肾炎尿毒症期患者,近一个月来厌食、皮肤瘙痒。前日起呕吐。体检:血压172/120mmHg,神志清楚,贫血貌,心肺检查无异常。Hb50g/L,尿蛋白(+),尿比重1.010,血肌酐795g.mol/L,血钾4.0mmol/L。该患者因酸中毒给予5
患儿女,4岁。高热咳嗽,2日后全身出现针尖大小的红色皮疹,触之砂纸感。如患儿出现眼睑水肿,血尿、恶心、呕吐,最可能的并发症是
患者,男性,28岁。劳累后心悸、气短5年,休息可缓解。近1年活动中曾有发作过晕厥2次。体检:胸骨左缘第3~4肋间听到较粗糙的喷射性收缩期杂音;X线检查心影增大不明显;心电图表现为ST—T改变,胸前导联常出现巨大倒置T波。在Ⅰ、aVL或Ⅱ、Ⅲ、aVF、V4、
股价随着成交量的递增而上涨,为市场行情的正常特性,此种量增价涨关系,表示股价可能下降。( )
国家授权投资的机构投资设立的国有独资公司不设立股东会,授权公司董事会行使股东会的所有权利。()
社会目标模式的小组目标是()。
2化简得(a+b)+(b-a)i=2,所以a=b=1,a+b=2。
He’s______hischildrentomycareforaday.
最新回复
(
0
)