首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2013-05-10
47
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"—especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramaticj much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, American lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
In Britain, newspapers______.
选项
A、do the same as American newspapers do
B、are not interested in publishing details about the trial before it takes place
C、are not allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
D、are allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
答案
C
解析
文中作者在第四段第二句和第三句谈到,英美两国在受理重刑案件时一个最显著的区别是:美国法律并不阻止报纸和电视在庭审前对这类案件的大肆渲染。由此可见,在审理重刑案件之前,英国法律是不允许报纸报道任何细节的。因此这道题的正确答案应当为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/cYxd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Wesometimesthinkhumansareuniquelyvulnerabletoanxiety,butstressseemstoaffecttheimmunedefensesofloweranimalsto
Inthelateyearsofthenineteenthcentury,"capital"and"labour"wereenlargingandperfectingtheirrivalorganizationsonm
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreallygoodscienceitisimpossibletopredict.Ifthethi
nominating本题和第3题同属信息题。难度较大。注意听原文的:“...theGRAMMYprocesscanbedividedintofivestage...”之后紧接的内容,就可以很轻松地答对这两道题。
Someyearsago,PioneerHi-bredInternational,whereIwasemployed,purchasedNorandCorporation.Pioneer’ssalesrepresenta
Whatisleanproduction?Perhapsthebestwaytodescribethisinnovativeproductionsystemistocontrastitwithcraftproduct
HowmanyemailmessagesdidAmericanssendin1999?
Asidefrom.perpetuatingitself,thesolepurposeoftheAmericanAcademyandInstituteofArtsandLettersisto"foster,assis
Therearemorerichpeoplethaneverbefore,includingsome7millionmillionaires,andover400billionaires.Fromsippingcham
ManyUnitedStatescompanieshave,unfortunately,madethesearchforlegalprotectionfromimportcompetitionintoamajorline
随机试题
短期信用工具主要指()。
A.B细胞缺陷病B.T细胞缺陷病C.T、B细胞联合免疫缺陷病D.吞噬细胞缺陷病E.补体缺陷病由于免疫球蛋白减少或缺乏引起()
A.聚乙烯吡咯烷酮B.乙基纤维素C.β-环糊精D.磷脂和胆固醇E.聚乳酸制备脂质体常用的材料是()
谁可以作为本案原告人?()若法院受理了此案,本案原告应负举证责任的事实包括哪些?()
我同的残疾人事业总体呈现出梯次发展的格局,随着新中国的成立基础日渐牢固,随着改革开放的逐步深入而不断发展,其既有传统的_______,也有政策的_______,还有时代的_______。依次填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
根据以下资料,回答下列问题2014年中国网络经济规模相比2007年增长了约()倍。
论述1937—1945年间苏日、苏中的关系。
我国多数软件开发工作者的“版权意识”十分淡漠,不懂得通过版权来保护自己的合法权益。最近对500多位软件开发者的调查表明,在制定开发计划时也同时制定了版权申请计划的仅占20%。以下哪项如果为真,最能削弱上述结论?
设b>a≥0,f(x)在[a,b]上连续,在(a,b)内可导,f(a)≠f(b),求证:存在ξ,η∈(a,b)使得.
(31)表示了类间“is-a”的关系,而(32)表示了类之间的“contains-a”关系。
最新回复
(
0
)