首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
This month Singapore passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’ s parents. Called the Mai
This month Singapore passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’ s parents. Called the Mai
admin
2012-06-18
35
问题
This month Singapore passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’ s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Singapore government.
That does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure as un-Asian. Other who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will subvert relations within the family, cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. The law cannot legislate filial responsibility any more than it can legislate love. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality provide is insufficient. Singapore needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to shore it up.
Like many other developed nations, Singapore faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60 years of age. Demography is inexorable. In 1980, 7.2% of the population was in this bracket. At the turn of the century, that figure grew to 11%. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age perse. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family. This is not a revolutionary concept, nor is it uniquely Asian. Care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized societies.
The problem in Singapore is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into ten problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what about the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support? They have several options: (a) get a job that work until they die; (b) apply for public assistance you have to be destitute to apply); or (c) starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have to far kept Asian nations from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order it is unjust.
Those who deride the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits miss the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s—not society’s—responsibility to look after his parents. Singapore is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea. It reinforces the traditional values and it doesn’t hurt a society now and then to remind itself of its core values.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice. Until now, if a person asked family elders, clergymen or the Ministry of Community Development to help get financial support from his children, the most they could do was to mediate. But mediators have no teeth, and a child could simply ignore their pleas.
But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace. Few people would be so thick-skinned as to say, "Sue and be damned". The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened. It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the recalcitrant son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.
It would be nice to think that Singapore doesn’t need this kind of law. But that belief ignores the clear demographic trends and the effect of affluence itself on traditional bonds. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.
The author thinks that if the Bill becomes law, its effect would be_____.
选项
A、indirect
B、unnoticed
C、apparent
D、straightforward
答案
A
解析
题目问:如果议案合法化,将会带来什么影响。通过阅读文章可知,如果议案通过变为法律,那么,这项法律的作用将是非常微妙的。因为父母只有在迫不得已的情况下才会到法院起诉子女,而法院考虑社会稳定和家庭和睦,也会谨慎处理。这就说明,议案的作用将主要是间接的。第十段“If it does indeed become law,the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.”所以,答案是A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/cvnO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Itisimpossibleforparentstoshieldtheirchildrenfromeverydanger.
AnotherexampleoftheexerciseofpowerbyCongresswastheactionittookduringtheReconstructionPeriodaftertheCivilWar
Theparentswhospeak______maycausetheirchildrentobecomeconfused.
Intheirworldofdarkness,itwouldseemlikelythatsomeoftheanimalsmighthavebecomeblind,ashashappenedtosomecave
Inanallergicreaction,theimmunesystemmistakenly______aharmlesssubstanceasaharmfulone.
OneworddescribeswhatmakesSingaporework:discipline.
Itseemsareasonableruleofthumbthatanygenuineofferofhelpandsupportfrompeopleororganizationswillbeaccompanied
Shedidn’topenlyattacktheplan,butheroppositionwas______inherfailuretosayanythinginsupportofit
随机试题
从法律特征的角度,以运费或仓储费差价为经营收入的国际货运代理人的类型是()
阴跷、阳跷两脉均至的部位是( )
以下关于协调的描述中,错误的是
男性,55岁,右腹股沟部内侧有一球形肿块约两年余。肿块逐渐增大,影响劳动,站立时即刻出现,平卧时自行消退。查体:右腹股沟部内侧及耻骨结节外上方有一球形包块,未进入阴囊,可用手回纳,咳嗽时有膨胀性冲击感,压腹股沟韧带中点上方时仍可见包块突出
建设项目中防治污染的设施,必须与主体工程同时()。
无担保流动资金贷款的利率在贷款期间有很大波动性。()
苏联心理学家彼得罗夫斯基以中学生为研究对象设计了一个实验:给学生一份问卷,问卷中有几个关于道德问题的判断,要求学生对这些判断表示赞成或反对。问题很简单,每个学生都能根据公认的准则做出回答。过了一段时间之后,把这些关于道德的判断列入一张更长的项目单之中,而在
赵某向吕某借款35万元,借期3年。赵某以自己的奥迪新车提供抵押担保。抵押期间,方某向赵某表示愿意以50万元购买该车。下列选项说法不正确的是()。
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayonstressmanagement.Youressayshouldincludetheimportance
A、Healthandsafetyconditionsintheworkplace.B、Rightsandresponsibilitiesofcompanyemployees.C、Commoncomplaintsmadeby
最新回复
(
0
)