首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor, credits the world’s economic a
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor, credits the world’s economic a
admin
2011-02-11
50
问题
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor, credits the world’s economic and social progress over the last thousand years to "Western civilization and its dissemination." The reason, he believes, is that Europeans invented systematic economic development Landes adds that three unique aspects of European culture were crucial ingredients in Europe’s economic growth.
First, science developed as an autonomous method of intellectual inquiry that successfully disengaged itself from the social constraints of organized religion and from the political constraints of centralized authority. Though Europe lacked a political center, its scholars benefited from the use of a single vehicle of communication: Latin. This common tongue facilitated an adversarial discourse in which new ideas about the physical world could be tested, demonstrated, and then accepted across the continent and eventually across the world.
Second, Landes espouses a generalized form of Max Weber’s thesis that the values of work, initiative, and investment made the difference for Europe. Despite his emphasis on science, Landes does not stress the notion of rationality as such. In his view, "what counts is work, thrift, honesty, patience, [and] tenacity." The only route to economic success for individuals or states is working hard, spending less than you earn, and investing the rest in productive capacity. This is his fundamental explanation of the problem posed by his book’s subtitle: "Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor." For historical reasons—an emphasis on private property, an experience of political pluralism, a temperate climate, an urban style—Europeans have, on balance, followed those practices and therefore have prospered.
Third, and perhaps most important, Europeans were learners. They "learned rather greedily," as Joel Mokyr put it in a review of Landes’s book. Even if Europeans possessed indigenous technologies that gave them an advantage (spectacles, for example), as Landes believes they did, their most vital asset was the ability to assimilate knowledge from around the world. and put it to use—as in borrowing the concept of zero and rediscovering Aristotle’s Logic from the Arabs and taking paper and gunpowder from the Chinese via the Muslim world. Landes argues that a systematic resistance to learning from other cultures had become the greatest handicap of the Chinese by the eighteenth century and remains the greatest handicap of Arab countries today.
Although his analysis of European expansion is almost nonexistent, Landes does not argue that Europeans were beneficent bearers of civilization to a benighted world. Rather, he relies on his own commonsense law: "When one group is strong enough to push another around and stands to gain by it, it will do so." In contrast to the new school of world historians, Landes believes that specific cultural values enabled technological advances that in turn made some Europeans strong enough to dominate people in other parts of the world. Europeans therefore proceeded to do so with great viciousness and cruelty. By focusing on their victimization in this process, Landes holds, some postcolonial states have wasted energy that could have been put into productive work and investment. If one could sum up Landes’s advice to these states in one sentence, it might be "Stop whining and get to work." This is particularly important, indeed hopeful, advice, he would argue, because success is not permanent. Advantages are not fixed, gains from trade are unequal, and different societies react differently to market signals. Therefore, not only is there hope for undeveloped countries, but developed countries have little cause to be complacent, because the current situation "will press hard" on them.
The thrust of studies like Landes’s is to identify those distinctive features of European civilization that lie behind Europe’s rise to power and the creation of modernity more generally. Other historians have placed a greater emphasis on such features as liberty, individualism, and Christianity. In a review essay, the art historian Craig Clunas listed some of the less well known linkages that have been proposed between Western culture and modernity, including the propensities to think quantitatively, enjoy pornography, and consume sugar. All such proposals assume the fundamental aptness of the question: What elements of European civilization led to European success? It is a short leap from this assumption to outright triumphalism. The paradigmatic book of this school is, of course, The End of History and the Last Man, in which Francis Fuknyama argues that after the collapse of Nazism in the twentieth century, the only remaining model for human organization in the industrial and communications ages is a combination of market economics and limited, pluralist, democratic government.
Lands believes that ______.
选项
A、Europeans set out to bring civilization to an unfortunate world
B、the Europeans dominated other countries simply because they were strong
C、the desire of Europeans to colonize other countries stemmed from specific cultural values
D、the colonized countries themselves were to blame for being victimized by Europeans
答案
B
解析
细节判断题。此题要求理解文章第四段前半部分的内容,在解释欧洲殖民问题时,Landes依靠的是常识,即弱肉强食。在欧洲科技上的进步使它们得以征服世界上其他地方的人民。因此B是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/dLYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Thecomingoftherailwaysinthe1830stransformedsocietyandeconomiclifebyproviding,forfirsttime,masstransportforp
Criticismofresearchlaysasignificantfoundationforfutureinvestigativework,butwhenstudentsbegintheirownprojects,t
Criticismofresearchlaysasignificantfoundationforfutureinvestigativework,butwhenstudentsbegintheirownprojects,t
A、readingpassagesB、theverbalpartC、thequantitativepartD、writtenskirlsD
Whoistheauthorof"CommonSense"?
Peoplearemovingtocitiesindroves.In1950,two-thirdsoftheworld’spopulationlivedinthecountryside.NewYorkwasthe
Peoplearemovingtocitiesindroves.In1950,two-thirdsoftheworld’spopulationlivedinthecountryside.NewYorkwasthe
HumanitiesDisciplinesInmanypeople’seyes,thehumanitiesdisciplinesseemtobedyingout.However,actually,students
HumanitiesDisciplinesInmanypeople’seyes,thehumanitiesdisciplinesseemtobedyingout.However,actually,students
ModernExaminationsIntheschoolsofancienttimes,themostimportantexaminationswerespoken.Usuallythestudentswere
随机试题
A.胃阴不足,虚中有热B.气逆痰阻,胃气上逆C.脾胃阳虚,膈间不利D.肝气上乘,胃气上冲呃声低弱无力,气不得续,面色苍白,手足不温,舌淡苔白,脉沉细弱。其病机是
下列不属于呋塞米的适应证是
WHO推荐的全身应用氟化物的方法是
根据对患者人身造成的损害程度,医疗事故分为四级,三级医疗事故是指( )根据对患者人身造成的损害程度,。医疗事故分为四级,四级医疗事故是指( )
甲公司开发的系列楼盘由乙公司负责安装电梯设备。乙公司完工并验收合格投入使用后,甲公司一直未支付工程款,乙公司也未催要。诉讼时效期间届满后,乙公司组织工人到甲公司讨要。因高级管理人员均不在,甲公司新录用的法务小王,擅自以公司名义签署了同意履行付款义务的承诺函
开放式基金通过投资者向基金管理公司申购和赎回实现流通转让。()
根据下面表格所提供的信息回答问题:2010年城镇居民人均消费性支出增幅最小的是()。
甲乙两个办公室的员工都不到20人,如果从甲办公室调到乙办公室若干人,则甲的人数是乙的2倍;如果乙调到甲办公室相同的人数,则甲的人数就是乙的3倍,则原来甲办公室有多少人?
【1】【10】
AstrologyA)Astrologyisthestudyofhowthesun,themoon,planets,andstarsaresupposedlyrelatedtolifeandeventso
最新回复
(
0
)