首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sc
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sc
admin
2013-01-24
47
问题
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs
We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden has a plan, as does a coalition led by Families USA (a liberal advocacy group) and America’s Health Insurance Plans (a trade group). To some extent, all these plans and others aim to provide insurance to the estimated 47 million Americans who lack it—a situation widely deplored as a national disgrace. But the real significance of all these proposals, I submit, lies elsewhere.
For decades, Americans have treated health care as if it exists in a separate economic and political world: when people need care, they should get it; costs should remain out of sight.
About 60 percent of Americans receive insurance through their employers; to most workers, the full costs are unknown. The 65-and-older population and many poor people receive government insurance. Except for modest Medicare premiums and payroll taxes, costs are largely buried in federal and state budgets.
It is this segregation of health care from everything else that is now crumbling—and the various health proposals are just one sign. We see others all the time. For example, even with employer-provided insurance, workers’ monthly premiums (which cover only part of the costs) have skyrocketed. From 1999 to 2006, they doubled from $129 to $248.
Look at Massachusetts. Last year the then Gov. Mitt Romney made headlines by signing legislation to cover all the state’s uninsured. The law required that everyone with incomes three times the federal poverty line buy "affordable" insurance (people with incomes below that threshold would be subsidized on a sliding scale). Romney suggested annual premiums for a single worker might total $2,400. But when insurance companies recently provided real estimates, the cost was much higher: $4,560. Is it a sensible policy to force workers with a $30,000 income— about triple the poverty line— to spend nearly a sixth of their budget on health insurance, as opposed to food, rent or transportation? Good question.
The hard questions won’t sit still, because health care (now a sixth of the economy, up from an 11th in 1980) is too big to be hidden. Myths abound. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the doubling of premiums for employer-provided coverage doesn’t mean companies shifted a greater share of costs to workers. In both 1999 and 2006, premiums covered 27 percent of costs, says Paul Fronstin of the Employee Benefit Research Institute. It’s simply the rapid rise in total health spending that’s depressed workers’ take-home pay.
One myth about the uninsured is that, because they’re heavy users of emergency-room services, providing them with insurance (and regular care) would actually lower their costs. This may be true for some—but not most. The trouble is that the uninsured don’t really use emergency rooms heavily. A study on the journal Health Affairs finds that their use is similar to that of people with private insurance—and half that of people with Medicaid. The upshot is that extending insurance to all the uninsured would be costly, because they would get more and (presumably) better care. John Sheils of the Lewin Group estimates the annual cost of their care would rise 75 percent to $145 billion.
Our health-care system will inevitably combine government regulation and private enterprise. But what should the mix be? Which patients, providers and technologies should be subsidized and why? How important is health care compared with other public and private goals? Will an expanding healthcare sector spur the economy—or, through high taxes and insurance premiums, retard it? We have refused to have this debate for obvious reasons. A friend of mine recently had a near-death experience; he survived only because he had superb medical care. Debating health care makes us queasy, because it pits moral imperatives (including the right to live) against coldhearted economics.
I don’t intend to examine—at least now—all the new proposals. Some would do better at some goals (say, protecting the poor) than at others (say, controlling costs). But the Bush proposal does have one huge virtue: it exposes health-care costs to the broad public. By not taxing employer-paid insurance, the government now provides a huge invisible subsidy to workers. Bush wouldn’t end the subsidy, but by modifying it with specific deductions for insurance ($15,000 for families, $7,500 for singles), he would force most workers to see the costs. By contrast, some other proposals disguise their costs. Schwarzenegger’s plan shifts costs to the federal government, doctors and hospitals. It’s clever, but it perpetuates the illusion that health care is cheap—or even free.
However our health system evolves—with more government control or more market influence—Americans need to come to a more realistic understanding of its limits. Underestimating its costs and exaggerating its benefits guarantees disappointment. If the present outpouring of proposals signals a start of our needed debate, then it is long overdue.
The word "upshot" in paragraph six means_____.
选项
A、myth
B、effect
C、outcome
D、misunderstanding
答案
C
解析
第六段讲人们对未投保人的误区,认为未投保人大量使用急诊室服务,那么该误区的结果是给未投保人保险的代价是昂贵的。故C为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/dMaO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheEnglishVocabularyVocabularyisacompleteinventoryofthewordsinalanguage.Itcanbedividedintoactivevocabulary
TheEnglishVocabularyVocabularyisacompleteinventoryofthewordsinalanguage.Itcanbedividedintoactivevocabulary
TheEnglishVocabularyVocabularyisacompleteinventoryofthewordsinalanguage.Itcanbedividedintoactivevocabulary
Amongthemanywaysinwhichpeoplecommunicatethroughspeech,publicspeakinghasprobablyreceivedmorestudyandattractedm
TheChamberlain’sMen,inShakespeare’stime,werearemarkablegroupofpeople-excellent______whowerealsobusinesspartnersa
Suchjoy,Itwasthespringof1985,andPresidentReaganhadjustgivenMotherTeresatheMedalofFreedominaRoseGardencer
历史的道路,不是平坦的,有时走到艰难的境界。这是全靠雄伟的精神才能够冲过去的。一条浩浩荡荡的长江大河,有时候到很宽阔的境界,平原无际,一泻万里。有时候流到很逼狭的境界,两岸从山迭岭,绝壁断崖,江河流于期间,回环曲折,及其险峻。民族生命的进展,其经
洋教师说:“这文章写得当然好,而且绝妙无比,你们听——”他拿起作文念起来,“我们学校最美的地方,不是教室,不是操场,也不是校门口那个带喷水的小花坛,而是食堂。瞧,玻璃干净得几”乎叫你看不到它的存在——”洋教师念到这儿,眼睛调皮地一亮,眉毛一挑,“听听,多么
为什么要保护物种和语种?首先在于权利。每一物种都有在地球上生存的权利,每一个小民族都有使用祖先传递给他们的预言的权利,那几乎是他们最重要的特征。其次,这种保护对其他物种,对其他人,对全人类都有好处。文化储藏和积淀在语言中。人类文化的多样性储藏在其多样的语种
随机试题
下列哪组药物全部属于AT1受体拮抗药:
AMI的早期标志物是
外用膏剂中的软膏与膏药在中国应用甚早。在《黄帝内经》(素问)“痈疽篇”中已有“疏砭之,涂以豕膏”的记载。汉代名医华佗在施用外科手术后,常习用“神膏”以促进伤口愈合。现代研究显示,外用膏剂可经皮给药而产生局部或全身治疗作用。关于外用膏剂叙述错误的是
主某,住所地为A地;李某,住所地为B地;现二人因贪污被判处刑罚,依次分别监禁于C地和D地。2015年5月,主某拟向人民法院提起诉讼,要求李某偿还欠款18万元。下列人民法院中,有权管辖本案的是()。
我国古代首次设立的中央教育行政机构是()
马克思说:“人的思维是否具有对象的真理性,这并不是一个理论的问题,而是一个实践的问题。人应该在实践中证明自己思维的真理性,即自己思维的现实性和力量,亦即自己思维的此岸性。”这句话所体现的哲学内涵是
下列关于栈的描述正确的是
将考生文件夹下QNE文件夹中的PHEA.FF文件复制到考生文件夹下的XDM文件夹中,文件名为AHF.NA。
Dollytheclone(克隆羊多利)wasbornalamb,butherchromosomes(染色体)telladifferenstory.Theysayshewasalreadyafewyearso
A、Thetextsaretherevealingofthetexters’characters.B、Thetextsarewellwrittenbythetexters.C、Thetextsareunaccepta
最新回复
(
0
)