首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On January 11th, a remarkable legal case opens in a San Francisco courtroom—on its way, it seems almost certain, to the Supreme
On January 11th, a remarkable legal case opens in a San Francisco courtroom—on its way, it seems almost certain, to the Supreme
admin
2013-03-27
30
问题
On January 11th, a remarkable legal case opens in a San Francisco courtroom—on its way, it seems almost certain, to the Supreme Court. Perry v. Schwarzenegger challenges the constitutionality of Proposition 8, the California referendum that, in November 2008, overturned a state Supreme Court decision allowing same-sex couples to marry. Its lead lawyers are unlikely allies; Theodore B. Olson, the former solicitor general under President George W. Bush, and a prominent conservative; and David Boies, the Democratic trial lawyer who was his opposing counsel in Bush v. Gore. The two are mounting an ambitious case that pointedly circumvents the incremental, narrowly crafted legal gambits and the careful state-by-state strategy, leading gay-rights organizations have championed in the fight for marriage equality. The Olson-Boies team hopes for a ruling that will transform the legal and social landscape nationwide, something on the order of Brown v. Board of Education, in 1954, or Loving v.Virginia, the landmark 1967 Supreme Court ruling that invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage.
Olson’s interest in this case has puzzled quite a few people. What’s in it for him? Is he sincere? Does he really think he can sway the current Court? But when I spoke with Olson, who is sixty-nine, in early December, he sounded confident and impassioned; the case clearly fascinated him both as an intellectual challenge and as a way to make history. "The Loving case was forty-two years ago," he said, perched on the edge of his chair in the law offices of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, in Washington, D.C., where he is a partner. "It’s inconceivable to us these days to say that a couple of a different racial background can’t get married. " Olson wore a brightly striped shirt and a paisley tie, without a jacket; there was something folksy in his speech, which reminded me that he’s a Westerner, who grew up and was educated in Northern California. He said, "Separate is not equal. Civil unions and domestic partnerships are not the same as marriage. We’re not inventing any new right, or creating a new right, or asking the courts to recognize a new right. The Supreme Court has said over and over and over again that marriage is a fundamental right, and although our opponents say, ’Well, that’s always been involving a man and a woman,’ when the Supreme Court has talked about it, they’ve said it’s an associational right, it’s a liberty right, it’s a privacy right, and it’s an expression of your identity, which is all wrapped up in the Constitution. " "The Justices of the Supreme Court", Olson said, "are individuals who will consider this seriously, and give it good attention," and he was optimistic that he could persuade them.(The losing side in San Francisco will likely appeal to the Ninth Circuit, and from there the case could proceed to the Supreme Court.)Olson’s self-assurance has a sound basis: he has argued fifty-six cases before the high court—he was one of the busiest lawyers before the Supreme Court bench last year—and prevailed in forty-four of them. Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy attended his wedding three years ago, in Napa. Olson said that he wanted the gay-marriage case to be a "teaching opportunity, so people will listen to us talk about the importance of treating people with dignity and respect and equality and affection and love and to stop discriminating against people on the basis of sexual orientation. "
If the Perry case succeeds before the Supreme Court, it could mean that gay marriage would be permitted not only in California but in every state. And, if the Court recognized homosexuals as indistinguishable from heterosexuals for the purposes of marriage law, it would be hard, if not impossible, to uphold any other laws that discriminated against people on the basis of sexual orientation. However, a loss for Olson and Boies could be a major setback to the movement for marriage equality. Soon after Olson and Boies filed the case, last May, some leading gay-rights organizations—among them the A. C. L. U. , Human Rights Campaign, Lambda Legal, and the National Center for Lesbian Rights— issued a statement condemning such efforts. The odds of success for a suit weren’t good, the groups said, because the "Supreme Court typically does not get too far ahead of either public opinion or the law in the majority of states. " The legal precedent that these groups were focused on wasn’t Loving v. Virginia but, rather, Bowers v. Hardwick, the 1986 Supreme Court decision that stunned gay-rights advocates by upholding Georgia’s antiquated law against sodomy. It was seventeen years before the Court was willing to revisit the issue, in Lawrence v. Texas, though by then only thirteen states still had anti-sodomy statutes; this time, the Court overturned the laws, with a 6-3 vote and an acerbic dissent from Justice Antonin Scalia, who declared that the Court had aligned itself with the "homosexual agenda," adding, "Many Americans do not want persons who openly engage in homosexual conduct as partners in their business, as scoutmasters for their children, as teachers in their children’s schools, or as boarders in their home. They view this as protecting themselves and their families from a lifestyle that they believe to be immoral and destructive. "
Seventeen years was a long time to wait. "A loss now may make it harder to go to court later," the activists’ statement read. "It will take us a lot longer to get a good Supreme Court decision if the Court has to overrule itself. " Besides, the groups argued, "We lost the right to marry in California at the ballot box. That’s where we need to win it back. " Plenty of gay-marriage supporters agreed that it was smarter to wait until the movement had been successful in more states—and, possibly, the composition of the Supreme Court had shifted.(During the last year of a second Obama term, Scalia would be eighty-one.)
The first sentence of paragraph 1 means______.
选项
A、the San Francisco court cannot make the final decision
B、only the Supreme Court has the authority to rule for or against the case
C、it’s very hard to win the case for same-sex marriage in the San Francisco court and probaly they would have to file the case in the Supreme Court
D、they would certainly win the case for same-sex marriage in the Supreme Court
答案
C
解析
“On January 11th,a remarkable legal case opens in a San Francisco courtroom--on its way,it seems almost certain,to the Supreme Court.”说明这个案子很难在旧金山有所结论,有可能会提交到最高法院审理裁决。由此推断,答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/dXmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Theriseofmultinationalcorporations(跨国公司),globalmarketing,newcommunicationstechnologies,andshrinkingculturaldiffere
______scientistshaveobservedincreasedpollutioninthewatersupply.
Whereonestageofchilddevelopmenthasbeenleftout,ornotsufficientlyexperienced,thechildmayhavetogobackandcaptu
Ofallthesoldierstheyhadthe______ofbeingthefiercest,themostpatriotic,thetoughest.
CrossingWesleyanuniversity’scampususuallyrequireswalkingovercolorfulmessageschalkedontheground.Theycanbeasinno
Ninety-fivepercentofadultAmericanssleepseventoeighthoursanight.Therestseemtoneedmorethanninehours,orgetal
IthadbeenaterribleafternoonforJane,______ataboutsixo’clockinherfather’ssuddencollapseintounconsciousness.
Standardusageincludesthosewordsandexpressionsunderstood,used,andacceptedbyamajorityofthespeakersofalanguagei
DoctorsatStanfordUniversityarestudyingamedicationtheyhopewillalleviatethesufferingofmillionsofAmericanwomen.B
ThestudyoflawhasbeenrecognizedforcenturiesasabasicintellectualdisciplineinEuropeanuniversities.However,onlyin
随机试题
A.白色稠厚豆渣样B.灰白色,匀质,腥臭味C.稀薄,脓性,泡沫状D.白色糊状或蛋清样E.脓性白带滴虫性阴道炎的典型白带为:
某企业2016年年初与年末所有者权益分别为400万元和500万元,则该企业2016年的所有者权益增长率为()。
主要通行于商代、刻在龟甲和兽骨上的汉字形体是________。
疖、痈的常见致病菌为()
A.使用图示表达自己的意见B.轻微前倾坐姿,关注对方讲话,不轻易打断C.使对方能听懂和理解自己表达的意思D.通过察言观色,发现对方的真实意图E.让对方很清楚地理解所提问题的核心,以获取较多的信息在人际传播技巧中,为说话技巧的是
患者,女,42岁。因感受风寒后,时吐清水,食后乃吐,苔白脉迟,喜暖畏寒,大便溏薄。针灸时选
建设项目工程分析方法不包括()。
某施工单位承担某机电工程项目设备安装。建设单位将一台不能立即安装的大型机组运至施工单位工程现场的大型机械设备临时摆放场地存放,交与施工单位管理。搬运过程无设备管理人员参加,未进行设备配件的进出库清点、验收。机组下面铺垫道木,上面用防雨布遮盖,零、配件木箱放
井冈山革命根据地是毛泽东率领秋收起义部队创立的。()
查询设计器分为上下两部分,上半部分是表的显示区,下半部分是【】。
最新回复
(
0
)