首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On January 11th, a remarkable legal case opens in a San Francisco courtroom—on its way, it seems almost certain, to the Supreme
On January 11th, a remarkable legal case opens in a San Francisco courtroom—on its way, it seems almost certain, to the Supreme
admin
2013-03-27
103
问题
On January 11th, a remarkable legal case opens in a San Francisco courtroom—on its way, it seems almost certain, to the Supreme Court. Perry v. Schwarzenegger challenges the constitutionality of Proposition 8, the California referendum that, in November 2008, overturned a state Supreme Court decision allowing same-sex couples to marry. Its lead lawyers are unlikely allies; Theodore B. Olson, the former solicitor general under President George W. Bush, and a prominent conservative; and David Boies, the Democratic trial lawyer who was his opposing counsel in Bush v. Gore. The two are mounting an ambitious case that pointedly circumvents the incremental, narrowly crafted legal gambits and the careful state-by-state strategy, leading gay-rights organizations have championed in the fight for marriage equality. The Olson-Boies team hopes for a ruling that will transform the legal and social landscape nationwide, something on the order of Brown v. Board of Education, in 1954, or Loving v.Virginia, the landmark 1967 Supreme Court ruling that invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage.
Olson’s interest in this case has puzzled quite a few people. What’s in it for him? Is he sincere? Does he really think he can sway the current Court? But when I spoke with Olson, who is sixty-nine, in early December, he sounded confident and impassioned; the case clearly fascinated him both as an intellectual challenge and as a way to make history. "The Loving case was forty-two years ago," he said, perched on the edge of his chair in the law offices of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, in Washington, D.C., where he is a partner. "It’s inconceivable to us these days to say that a couple of a different racial background can’t get married. " Olson wore a brightly striped shirt and a paisley tie, without a jacket; there was something folksy in his speech, which reminded me that he’s a Westerner, who grew up and was educated in Northern California. He said, "Separate is not equal. Civil unions and domestic partnerships are not the same as marriage. We’re not inventing any new right, or creating a new right, or asking the courts to recognize a new right. The Supreme Court has said over and over and over again that marriage is a fundamental right, and although our opponents say, ’Well, that’s always been involving a man and a woman,’ when the Supreme Court has talked about it, they’ve said it’s an associational right, it’s a liberty right, it’s a privacy right, and it’s an expression of your identity, which is all wrapped up in the Constitution. " "The Justices of the Supreme Court", Olson said, "are individuals who will consider this seriously, and give it good attention," and he was optimistic that he could persuade them.(The losing side in San Francisco will likely appeal to the Ninth Circuit, and from there the case could proceed to the Supreme Court.)Olson’s self-assurance has a sound basis: he has argued fifty-six cases before the high court—he was one of the busiest lawyers before the Supreme Court bench last year—and prevailed in forty-four of them. Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy attended his wedding three years ago, in Napa. Olson said that he wanted the gay-marriage case to be a "teaching opportunity, so people will listen to us talk about the importance of treating people with dignity and respect and equality and affection and love and to stop discriminating against people on the basis of sexual orientation. "
If the Perry case succeeds before the Supreme Court, it could mean that gay marriage would be permitted not only in California but in every state. And, if the Court recognized homosexuals as indistinguishable from heterosexuals for the purposes of marriage law, it would be hard, if not impossible, to uphold any other laws that discriminated against people on the basis of sexual orientation. However, a loss for Olson and Boies could be a major setback to the movement for marriage equality. Soon after Olson and Boies filed the case, last May, some leading gay-rights organizations—among them the A. C. L. U. , Human Rights Campaign, Lambda Legal, and the National Center for Lesbian Rights— issued a statement condemning such efforts. The odds of success for a suit weren’t good, the groups said, because the "Supreme Court typically does not get too far ahead of either public opinion or the law in the majority of states. " The legal precedent that these groups were focused on wasn’t Loving v. Virginia but, rather, Bowers v. Hardwick, the 1986 Supreme Court decision that stunned gay-rights advocates by upholding Georgia’s antiquated law against sodomy. It was seventeen years before the Court was willing to revisit the issue, in Lawrence v. Texas, though by then only thirteen states still had anti-sodomy statutes; this time, the Court overturned the laws, with a 6-3 vote and an acerbic dissent from Justice Antonin Scalia, who declared that the Court had aligned itself with the "homosexual agenda," adding, "Many Americans do not want persons who openly engage in homosexual conduct as partners in their business, as scoutmasters for their children, as teachers in their children’s schools, or as boarders in their home. They view this as protecting themselves and their families from a lifestyle that they believe to be immoral and destructive. "
Seventeen years was a long time to wait. "A loss now may make it harder to go to court later," the activists’ statement read. "It will take us a lot longer to get a good Supreme Court decision if the Court has to overrule itself. " Besides, the groups argued, "We lost the right to marry in California at the ballot box. That’s where we need to win it back. " Plenty of gay-marriage supporters agreed that it was smarter to wait until the movement had been successful in more states—and, possibly, the composition of the Supreme Court had shifted.(During the last year of a second Obama term, Scalia would be eighty-one.)
The first sentence of paragraph 1 means______.
选项
A、the San Francisco court cannot make the final decision
B、only the Supreme Court has the authority to rule for or against the case
C、it’s very hard to win the case for same-sex marriage in the San Francisco court and probaly they would have to file the case in the Supreme Court
D、they would certainly win the case for same-sex marriage in the Supreme Court
答案
C
解析
“On January 11th,a remarkable legal case opens in a San Francisco courtroom--on its way,it seems almost certain,to the Supreme Court.”说明这个案子很难在旧金山有所结论,有可能会提交到最高法院审理裁决。由此推断,答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/dXmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Lobbyinggroupsoftentrytodisguiseafinancialself-interestbyclumsilydressinguptheirargumentsintheguiseofconcern
Lobbyinggroupsoftentrytodisguiseafinancialself-interestbyclumsilydressinguptheirargumentsintheguiseofconcern
Overthepastcentury,allkindsofunfairnessanddiscriminationhavebeencondemnedormadeillegal.Butoneinsidiousformco
Mostofustellonetwoliesaday,accordingtoscientistswhostudythesethings.Andwerarelygetcaught,becausetheliesw
AskanAmericanschoolchildwhatheorsheislearninginschoolthesedaysandyoumightevengetareply,providedyouaskit
In1993,amallsecuritycameracapturedashakyimageoftwo10-year-oldboysleadingamuchsmallerboyoutofaLiverpool,En
FordecadesmanyU.S.veteranswhotookpartinatmosphericnucleartestshavewonderedwhethertheirexposuretoradiationmigh
RealPolicemenhardlyrecognizeanyresemblancebetweentheirlivesandwhattheyseeonTV.Thefirstdifferenceisthata
Inthispart,youaleexpectedtowriteacompositionentitleIfIWeretheMayorofThisCityinnolessthan200words.Yourco
IntheU.S.A.manycommunitiesandchurchgroups______socialcentersforoldpeople.
随机试题
直肠指诊时不能触到【】
关于甲状腺结节的鉴别诊断,下列描述正确的有
我国塔式高层住宅的平面形式中,T形、Y形、二蝶形多用于北方地区,正十字形、井字形、风车形多用于南方地区,其最主要的制约因素是()。
通常在重大事故应急预案的______中可同时进行事故调查。
某一码头工程的土方工程项目,在招标文件中标明的土质为:以细粉砂土为主,并夹有粉质黏土、泥炭、淤泥及杂填土,在施工区段主要为细粉沙土,推荐利用水力冲挖机具边冲挖、边吹填连续作业的施工方案,在投标前承包人曾经到工地现场进行踏勘,投标时承包人就此方案进行施工设计
飞行员在海上会产生一种“倒飞错觉”,这属于()
已知向量α=(0,k,1)T是矩阵A=的逆矩阵A-1的特征向量,则常数k=_______.
某企业的E-R图中,职工实体的属性有:职工号、姓名、性别、出生日期、电话和所在部门,其中职工号为实体标识符,电话为多值属性,离退休职工所在部门为离退办。在逻辑设计阶段,应将职工号和电话单独构造一个关系模式,该关系模式为(60);因为离退休职工不参与企业的绝
Whatcanwelearnaboutthewomanfromthedialogue?
Cottongrass,whichgrowsonlyinarcticregions,hasbeentheonlysummertimesourceofproteinavailabletothecaribou.Thec
最新回复
(
0
)