首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When Tony Blair was elected to Britain’s House of Commons in 1983, he was just 30, the Labour Party’s youngest M.R Labour had ju
When Tony Blair was elected to Britain’s House of Commons in 1983, he was just 30, the Labour Party’s youngest M.R Labour had ju
admin
2012-02-24
66
问题
When Tony Blair was elected to Britain’s House of Commons in 1983, he was just 30, the Labour Party’s youngest M.R Labour had just fought and lost a disastrous election campaign on a far-left platform, and Margaret Thatcher, fresh from her victory in the Falklands War, was in her pomp. The opposition to Thatcher was limited to a few ancient warhorses and a handful of bright young things. Blair, boyish Blair, quickly became one of the best of the breed.
Nobody would call Blair, 54 on May 6, boyish today. His face is older and beaten up, his reputation in shreds. Very soon, he will announce the timetable for his departure from office. In a recent poll for the Observer newspaper, just 6% of Britons said they found Blair trustworthy, compared with 43% who thought the opposite. In Britain—as in much of the rest of the world—Blair is considered an unpopular failure.
I’ve been watching Blair practically since he entered politics—at first close up from the House of Commons press gallery, later from thousands of miles away. In nearly a quarter-century, I have never come across a public figure who more consistently asked the important questions about the relationships between individuals, communities and governments or who thought more deeply about how we should conduct ourselves in an interconnected world in which loyalties of nationality, ethnicity and religion continue to run deep. Blair’s personal standing in the eyes of the British public may never recover, but his ideas, especially in foreign policy, will long outlast him.
Britons (who have and expect an intensely personal relationship with their politician) love to grumble about their lot and their leaders, especially if—like Blair—they’ve been around for a decade. So you would never guess from a few hours down the pub how much better a place Britain is now than it was a decade ago. It’s more prosperous, it’s healthier, it’s better educated, and—with all the inevitable caveats about disaffected young Muslim men—it is the European nation most comfortable with the multicultural future that is the fate of all of them. It would be foolish to give all the credit for the state of this blessed plot to Blair but equally foolish to deny him any of it.
In today’s climate, however, this counts for naught compared with the blame that Blair attracts for ensnaring Britain in the fiasco of Iraq. As the Bush Administration careered from a war in Afghanistan to one in Iraq, with Blair always in support, it became fashionable to say the Prime Minister had become the President’s poodle.
This attack both misreads history and misunderstands Blair. Long before 9/11 shook up conventional thinking in foreig, n affairs, Blair had come by two beliefs he still holds: First, that it is wrong for the rest of the world to sit back and expect the U.S. to solve the really tough questions. Second, that some things a state does within its borders justify intervention even if they do not directly threaten another nation’s interests. Blair understood that today any country’s problems could quickly spread. As he said in a speech in 2004, "Before Sept. 11, I was already reaching for a different philosophy in international relations from a traditional one that has held sway since the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648—namely, that a country’s internal affairs are for it and you don’t interfere unless it threatens you, or breaches a treaty, or triggers an obligation of alliance."
Blair’s thinking crystallized during the Kosovo crisis in 1999. For Blair, the actions of Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic were so heinous that they demanded a response. There was nothing particularly artful about the way he put this. In an interview with Blair for a TV film on Kosovo after the war, I remember his justifying his policy as simply "the right thing to do." But Blair was nobody’s poodle. He and Bill Clinton had a near falling-out over the issue of ground troops. (Blair was prepared to contemplate a ground invasion of Kosovo, an idea that gave Clinton’ s team the vapors.) The success of Kosovo—and that of Britain’s intervention to restore order in Sierra Leone a year later—emboldened Blair to think that in certain carefully delineated cases the use of force for humanitarian purposes might make sense. As far back as 1999, he had Iraq on his mind. In a speech in Chicago at the height of the Kosovo crisis, Blair explicitly linked Milosevic with Saddam Hussein: "two dangerous and ruthless men."
In office, moreover, Blair had become convinced of the dangers that weapons of mass destruction (WMD) posed. He didn’t need 9/11 to think the world was a risky place. As a close colleague of Blair’s said to me in 2003, just before the war in Iraq, "He is convinced that if we don’t tackle weapons of mass destruction now, it is only a matter of time before they fall into the hands of rogue states or terrorists. If George Bush wasn’t pressing for action on this, Blair would be pressing George Bush on it." To those who knew him, there was simply never any doubt that he would be with the U.S. as it responded to the attacks or that he would stay with the Bush Administration if it close to tackle the possibility that Iraq had WMD.
The Prime Minister, of course, turned out to be disastrously wrong. By 2003, Iraq was already a ruined nation, long incapable of sustaining a sophisticated WMD program. And the Middle East turned out to be very different from the Balkans and West Africa. In a region where religious loyalties and fissures shape societies and where the armies of "the West" summon ancient rivalries and bitter memories, it was native to expect that an occupation would quickly change a society’s nature. "When we removed the Taliban and Saddam Hussein," Blair told Congress in 2003, "this was not imperialism. For these oppressed people, it was their liberation." But we have learned the hard way that it is not for the West to say what is imperialism and what is liberation. When you invade someone else’s country and turn his world upside down, good intentions are not enough.
Yet that on its own is not a sufficient judgment on Tony Blair. He will forever be linked to George Bush, but in crucial ways they saw the world very differently. For Blair, armed intervention to remove the Taliban and Saddam was never the only way in which Islamic extremism had to be combated. Far more than Bush, he identified the need to settle the Israel-Palestine dispute—"Here it is that the poison is incubated," he told Congress—if radical Islam was to lose its appeal. In Britain, while maintaining a mailed fist against those suspected of crimes, he tried to treat Islam with respect. He took the lead in ensuring that the rich nations kept their promises to aid Africa and lift millions from the poverty and despair that breed support for extremism. The questions Blair asked—When should we meddle in another nation’s life? Why should everything be left to the U.S.? What are the wellsprings of mutual cultural and religious respect? How can the West show its strength without using guns?—will continue to be asked for a generation. We will miss him when he’s gone.
What can be inferred from the passage about the author’s opinion of Tony Blair?
选项
A、He deserves his failure in office.
B、He is unpopular in his foreign policy.
C、He deserves better than conventional thinking.
D、He is naive in the use of force in foreign affairs.
答案
C
解析
作者通过全文来证明,布莱尔应该得到人们更好的评价。故C为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/dziO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
IntheAustralianstateofNewSouthWales,agovernmentsponsorsurveyrevealedsomeshockingstatisticsregarding【1】_
Inthelate16thcentury,______ruledEngland.
ItissaidthatGeorgeWashingtonwasoneofthefirsttorealizehowimportantthebuildingofcanalswouldbetothenation’s
LondonissteepedinDickensianhistory.Everyplacehevisited,everypersonhemet,wouldbedrawnintohisimaginationandre
8月17日的下午,约克逊号邮船无数的窗眼里,飞出五色飘扬的纸带,远远的抛到岸上,任凭送别的人牵住的时候,我的心是如何的飞扬而凄恻!痴绝的无数的送别者,在最远的江岸,仅仅牵着这终于断绝的纸条儿放这庞然大物,载着最重的离愁,飘然西去!船上生活,
A、hedidn’twanttoapprovetheresignationofEducationMinister.B、theresignedofficialswantedtheopportunitytoprovethei
Stratford-on-Avon,asweallknow,hasonlyoneindustry—WilliamShakespeare—buttherearetwodistinctlyseparateandincre
Atpresentcompaniesandindustriesliketosponsorsportsevents.Tworeasonsareputforwardtoexplainthisphenomenon.Thef
我直到几十年以后,才体会到云彩更多,霞光才愈美丽。从云翳中外露的霞光,才是璀璨多彩的。生命中不是只有快乐,也不是只有痛苦,快乐和痛苦是相生相成,互相衬托的。快乐是一抹徽云.痛苦是压城的乌云.这不同的云彩。在你生命的天边重叠着,在“夕阳无限好”的
______firstproposedtheSpeechActTheory.
随机试题
苗族的三大方言是()。
某公司发行公司债券,面值为1000元,票面利率为10%,期限为5年。已知市场利率为8%。要求:如果债券为按年付息、到期还本,发行价格为1020元,投资者是否愿意购买?
下列关于城市热负荷分类错误的是()。
资料1:北京京铁有限责任公司(110891××××)订购进口一批热拔合金钢无缝锅炉管(属法定检验检疫和自动进口许可管理商品,法定计量单位为千克),委托辽宁抚顺辽抚锅炉厂有限责任公司(210491××××)制造出口锅炉。载货运输工具于2007年4月10日申
王某在电脑公司购买一台电脑,使用10个月后出现故障;在“三包”有效期内.经两次修理仍无法正常使用。此时市场上已无同型号电脑。依照有关法律规定,该事件应如何解决?()
下列属于夫妻共同财产的是()。
中国共产党的最大政治优势是()
在Internet中负责选择合适的路由,使发送的数据分组(packet)能够正确无误地按照地址找到目的计算机所使用的__________【45】协议簇中的__________【46】协议。
在单CPU系统中,如果同时存在24个并发进程,则处于就绪队列中的进程最多有______个。
Classicalphysicsdefinesthevacuumasastateofabsence:avacuumissaidtoexistinaregionofspaceifthereisnothi
最新回复
(
0
)