首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
WELL—do they or don’t they? For years, controversy has raged over whether the electromagnetic fields produced by power lines cou
WELL—do they or don’t they? For years, controversy has raged over whether the electromagnetic fields produced by power lines cou
admin
2013-10-31
112
问题
WELL—do they or don’t they? For years, controversy has raged over whether the electromagnetic fields produced by power lines could cause cancer especially leukemia in young children. But in Britain last week confusion reached new heights.
One team from Bristol announced that it had evidence to back a controversial but plausible theory which would explain how power lines might cause cancer(electric fields attract airborne pollutants). Only to be followed by the release of results by another group in London which suggested there is nothing to worry about. What is going on?
Actually, the confusion may be more apparent than real. There can be no doubt that the effects of power lines on water droplets, pollutants and naturally occurring radon uncovered by the Bristol team are real and interning. But to suggest that they have anything to do with leukemia in children is premature. The extra exposure to pollution for a child living near power lines would be tiny, and it is not obvious why radon, a gas normally associated with lung cancer—would cause leukemia in children.
The second study, which drew reassuring blank, is the world’ s biggest ever probe of the statistical link between childhood cancers and magnetic fields of the sort produced by power lines and electrical appliances. It is one of several recent studies that have failed to find a link.
Unlike earlier research, these newer studies involved going into homes to measure the electromagnetic fields. The fields they measured included input from major power lines if they were.
Which is not to say the research is perfectly. Critics argue that Britain’ s childhood cancer study, for example, has not yet taken into account the surges in exposure that might come from, say, switching appliances on and off. And some people might wonder why measurements of the electric fields that are also produced by power lines did not figure in last week’ s study. But neither criticism amounts to a fatal blow. Electrical fields cannot penetrate the body significantly, for example.
A more serious concern is whether the British research provides an all-clear signal for such countries as the US where power lines carry more current and therefore produce higher magnetic fields. Pedants(书呆子)would conclude that it doesn’ t. But these counties will not have long to wait for answers from a major Japanese study.
In Britain the latest epidemiological study can be taken as the final word on the matter. If the electromagnetic fields in British homes can in some unforeseen way increase the risk of cancer, we can now be as certain as science allows that the increase is too tiny to measure.
It can be inferred from the passage that the British outcomes______.
选项
A、are expected to convince nobody but pedants
B、were found to have left much room for doubt
C、could have implications in such countries as the US
D、will be consistent with the Japanese ones in the near future
答案
D
解析
第七段提到Pedants(书呆子)would conclude that it doesn’t.即Pedants对英国的研究提出质疑,排除A项。由文章最后一段可看出作者对英国的研究持肯定态度,排除B项。第七段还提到一个更受关注的问题是英国的调查是否会为像美国这些输电线输送的电流更大,因此也就会产生更高的电磁场的国家提供all—clear signal,但作者对此问题并没有给出明确的回答,因此C项说法错误。由第七段最后一句话But thesecounties will not have long to wait for answers from a major Japanese study.可推知答案选D项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/eTU3777K
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
ThecontroversyaboutabortionhasbeengoingonintheUnitedStatesformorethantwentyyears.
WELL—dotheyordon’tthey?Foryears,controversyhasragedoverwhethertheelectromagneticfieldsproducedbypowerlinescou
Whetherapersonlikesaroutineofficejobornotdependslargelyontemperament.
A、Hesaidyes.B、Hesaidno.C、Hedidn’tgivedefiniteanswer.D、Hedidn’tknow.A当陌生人问“whethertherewouldbeanyopportuniti
Whetherthecauseismaternalanti-bodies,heavymetalsorsomethingelse,thereisnoquestionthatthebrainsofyoungchildre
Whetherthecauseismaternalanti-bodies,heavymetalsorsomethingelse,thereisnoquestionthatthebrainsofyoungchildre
Howmuchpaindoanimalsfeel?Thisisaquestionwhichhascausedendlesscontroversy.Opponentsofbiggameshooting,forexam
随机试题
关于上诉权的问题,下列哪项说法是正确的?()
求取建筑物重新购建价格的具体方法,有()。
其他单位如果因特殊原因需要使甩原始凭证时,经本单位负责人批准()。
长江公司以其拥有的专利权与华山公司交换生产设备一台,具有商业实质。专利权的账面价值为300万元(未计提减值准备),公允价值和计税价格均为420万元,适用的增值税税率6%。设备的账面原价为600万元,已计提折旧170万元.已计提减值准备30万元,公允价值和计
请根据所提供的教材片段,设计l课时的教学简案。要求:(1)写出一篇规范完整的课时教学简案;(2)恰当设定本课时的教学目标、教学重点和难点;(3)合理地设计学习活动和作业要求;(4)设计至少三个课堂提问;
甲医院的主治医生王某,为了救治李某,本着救死扶伤的精神,将已死亡的张某的眼角膜移植给了李某,张某的儿子得知此事后大闹甲医院,并在乙网站散布谣言。甲医院得知后要求网站删除内容,乙网站以核实为理由延迟一周。[中南财大2015年研]请根据此案例回答以下
Lookatthenotes.Someinformationismissing.Youwillhearpartofatalkbyaninvestmentconsultantofacompany.Foreach
SWAGGER:BRAVADO::
Completethesummarybelow.WriteNOMORETHANTWOWORDSforeachanswer.Everydaythehumanbodyisfightingoff(31)
Thesecondlittlepigwasunlucky.Hebuilthishousefromsticks.Itwasblownawaybyahuffing,puffingwolf,whichpromptly
最新回复
(
0
)