首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
admin
2017-04-21
141
问题
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. These studies have disclosed that the judgments of interviewers differ markedly and bear little or no relationship to the adequacy of job applicants.
Of the many reasons why this should be the case, three in particular stand out. The first reason is related to an error of judgment known as the halo effect. If a person has one noticeable good trait, their other characteristics will be judged as better than they really are. Thus, an individual who dresses smartly and shows self-confidence is likely to be judged capable of doing a job well regardless of his or her real ability.
Interviewers are also prejudiced by an effect called the primacy effect. This error occurs when interpretation of later information is distorted by earlier connected information. Hence, in an interview situation, the interviewer spends most of the interview trying to confirm the impression given by the candidate in the first few moments. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated that such an impression is unrelated to the aptitude of the applicant.
The phenomenon known as the contrast effect also skews the judgment of interviewers. A suitable candidate may be underestimated because he or she contrasts with a previous one who appears exceptionally intelligent. Likewise, an average candidate who is preceded by one who gives a weak showing may be judged as more suitable than he or she really is.
Since interviews as a form of personnel selection have been shown to be inadequate, other selection procedures have been devised which more accurately predict candidate suitability. Of the various tests devised, the predictor which appears to do this most successfully is cognitive ability as measured by a variety of verbal and spatial tests.
What does "hindrance"(Line 2, Para. 1)probably mean?
选项
A、Obstacle.
B、Advantage.
C、Incentive.
D、Standard.
答案
A
解析
本题是词义题。由文章第1句话“…interviewing is at best a hindrance,and may evencause harm”可以得出,面试甚至会导致破坏性的结果,那么它至少会妨碍正常的判断。所以选项A.Obstacle(障碍)语义贴切,是正确选项;选项B.Advantage(优势)、选项C.Incentive(激励因素)和选项D.Standard(标准)均不符合题意,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/eW9d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
Somepeopleholdthatoldpeopleshouldbetakencareathome,whileothersthinktheyshouldbeplacedinoldpeople’shouse.W
Amulticulturalpersonissomeonewhoisdeeplyconvincedthatallculturesareequallygood.【R1】______Andmostlikelyhehasbe
Filmhaspropertiesthatsetitapartfrompainting,sculpture,novels,andplays.Itisalso,initsmostpopularandpowerful
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Therearemanydifferentreasonswhyfashionissuchapowerfulculturalandeconomicinfluenceindevelopedsocietiesatthebe
1.Forgenerationsofstudents,writingtermpapershasbeenamajorsourceofnervesandfrustration,ifnottheultimatehomew
Atsometimeinyourlifeyoumayhaveastrongdesiretodosomethingstrangeorterrible.【R1】______Youknowthattocommitthe
Facialexpressionscarrymeaning,determinedbycontextsandrelationships.【R1】______Awoman’ssmileatapolicemanwhoisabou
随机试题
男,30岁。咽痛、咳嗽、发热,2周后发现尿色红,眼睑浮肿,尿量1000ml/24h。体检:全身皮肤未见皮疹,血压150/100mmHg。化验:尿蛋白(++),红细胞50~60/HP,血白蛋白32g/L,血肌酐123μmol/L。上述临床表现最可能的诊断
太阳头痛的部位阳明头痛的部位
安某,男,62岁。无明显诱因腰部疼痛半年,腰部隐隐作痛,酸软无力,缠绵不愈。其证型是
不可以进行骨髓移植治疗的血液病是
某放大电路的微变等效电路如图7-97所示,已知:Rb=82kΩ,RC=5.6kΩ,rbe=4.2kΩ,RL=22kΩ,电路的输入电阻ri和输出电阻ro分别为()。
背景资料:某施工单位承接了一座公路隧道的土建及交通工程施工项目,该隧道为单洞双向行驶的两车道浅埋隧道,设计净高为5m,净宽为12m,总长为1600m,穿越的岩层主要由页岩和砂岩组成,裂隙发育,设计采用新奥法施工、分部开挖和复合式衬砌。进场后,项目部与所
当收集、加工信息时,应注意信息的()。
根据下表所示的实验设计方案(a、b为两个自变量,S为被试),回答问题。在该实验设计中,不存在的误差是
党的十九大报告指出,要坚持问题导向,保持战略定力,推动全面从严治党向纵深发展。从严治党的重中之重是
Whatisthemaintopicoftheconversation?
最新回复
(
0
)