首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s duty to give instant obedience to
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s duty to give instant obedience to
admin
2013-10-11
46
问题
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s duty to give instant obedience to orders given by his military superiors? And apart from duty, will not the soldier suffer severe punishment, even death, if he refuses to do what he is ordered to? If, then, a soldier is told by his superior to burn this house or to shoot that prisoner, how can he be held criminally accountable on the ground’ that the burning or shooting was a violation of the laws of war?
These are some of the questions that are raised by the concept commonly called "superior orders", and its use as a defense in war crimes trials. It is an issue that must be as old as the laws of war themselves, and it emerged in legal guise over three centuries ago when, after the Stuart restoration in 1660, the commander of the guards at the trial and execution of Charles I was put on trial for treason and murder. The officer defended himself on the ground "that all I did was as a soldier, by the command of my superior officer whom I must obey or die," but the court gave him short shrift, saying that "When the command is traitorous, then the obedience to that command is also traitorous①."
Though not precisely articulated, the rule that is necessarily implied by this decision is that it is the soldier’s duty to obey lawful orders, but that he may disobey—and indeed must, under some circum stances-unlawful orders. Such has been the law of the United States since the birth of the nation. In 1804, Chief Justice John Marshall declared that superior orders would justify a subordinate’s conduct only "if not to perform a prohibited act," and there are many other early decisions to the same effect.
A strikingly illustrative case occurred in the wake of that conflict which most Englishmen have never heard ( although their troops burned the White House) and which we call the War of 1812. Our country was baldly split by that war too and, at a time when the United States Navy was not especially popular in New England, the ship-in-the-line Independence was lying in Boston Harbor. A passer-by directed abusive language at a marine standing guard on the ship, and the marine, Bevans by name, ran his bayonet through the man. Charged with murder, Bevans produced evidence that the marines on the Independence had been ordered to bayonet anyone showing them disrespect. The case was tried before Justice Joseph Story, next to Marshall, the leading judicial figure of those years, who charged that any such order as Bevans had invoked "would be illegal and void," and, if given and put into practice, both the superior and the subordinate would be guilty of murder②. In consequence, Bevans was convicted.
The order allegedly given to Bevans was pretty drastic, and Boston Harbor was not a battlefield; per haps it was not too much to expect the marine to realize that literal compliance might lead to bad trouble. But it is only too easy to conceive of circumstances where the matter might not be at all clear. Does the sub ordinate obey at peril that the order may later be ruled illegal, or is protected unless he has a good reason to doubt its validity?
What was the rule implied by the trail of the commander of the guards?
选项
A、A soldier must obey lawful orders, be he right or wrong.
B、Even if an order is unlawful, the soldier must still obey it.
C、A soldier may or must disobey unlawful orders or he must die.
D、It is the soldier’s duty to obey superior orders whatever they are.
答案
C
解析
细节推断题。根据第二段最后一句“When the command is traitorous,then the obedience to that command is also traitorous”和第三段第一句话“it is the soldier’s duty to obey lawful orders,but he indeed must disobey unlawful orders"我们推知士兵必须遵守合法的命令,否则就是背叛,他可以或者必须不遵守不合法的命令,但同样没有尽到职责而死。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/enGK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
Accordingtowhatyouhavejustsaid,amItounderstandthathisnewpost______noresponsibilitywithitatall?
Theyoungsoldierkilled25enemiesinaclosebattle,forwhichhewas______thetitleofCombatHero.
—"Howdidthegroupimproveitsdiscussion?"—"Theyalltookpart,eachmember______theresponsibilityofleadingonemeeting.
TheartofpublicspeakingbeganinancientGreeceover2,000yearsago.Now,twitter,instantmessenging,e-mail,blogsandcha
随机试题
A.清肝泻火B.清心泻火C.清胃泻火D.滋阴降火E.滋阴清热面色赤见于
涨价预备费以()为计算基数进行计算。
某公司发行某种债券,该债券面额为100元,发行价格为97元,这种发行方式属于()发行。
影响可供分配利润项目的因素有()。
在感应电场中电磁感应定律可以写成∮CEk.dr=,式中Ek为感应电场的电场强度,此式表明()。
甲:各国的国情和传统不同,但是对于谋杀和其他严重刑事犯罪实施死刑,至少是大多数人可以接受的,公开宣判和执行死刑可以有效地阻止恶性刑事案件的发生,它所带来的正面影响比负面影响肯定大得多,这是社会自我保护的一种必要机制。乙:我不能接受你的见解,因为在
甲、乙各以20%与80%的份额共有一间房屋,出租给丙。现甲欲将自己的份额转让,请问下列表述中哪一说法是正确的?()
从装有100克浓度为10%的盐水瓶中倒出10克盐水后,再向瓶中倒入10克清水,则此时盐水的浓度是11%。()
当代中国的核心价值体系只能是社会主义核心价值体系,其基本内容包括()。
关系数据库中,实现实体之间的联系是通过表与表之间的
最新回复
(
0
)