首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s duty to give instant obedience to
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s duty to give instant obedience to
admin
2013-10-11
50
问题
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s duty to give instant obedience to orders given by his military superiors? And apart from duty, will not the soldier suffer severe punishment, even death, if he refuses to do what he is ordered to? If, then, a soldier is told by his superior to burn this house or to shoot that prisoner, how can he be held criminally accountable on the ground’ that the burning or shooting was a violation of the laws of war?
These are some of the questions that are raised by the concept commonly called "superior orders", and its use as a defense in war crimes trials. It is an issue that must be as old as the laws of war themselves, and it emerged in legal guise over three centuries ago when, after the Stuart restoration in 1660, the commander of the guards at the trial and execution of Charles I was put on trial for treason and murder. The officer defended himself on the ground "that all I did was as a soldier, by the command of my superior officer whom I must obey or die," but the court gave him short shrift, saying that "When the command is traitorous, then the obedience to that command is also traitorous①."
Though not precisely articulated, the rule that is necessarily implied by this decision is that it is the soldier’s duty to obey lawful orders, but that he may disobey—and indeed must, under some circum stances-unlawful orders. Such has been the law of the United States since the birth of the nation. In 1804, Chief Justice John Marshall declared that superior orders would justify a subordinate’s conduct only "if not to perform a prohibited act," and there are many other early decisions to the same effect.
A strikingly illustrative case occurred in the wake of that conflict which most Englishmen have never heard ( although their troops burned the White House) and which we call the War of 1812. Our country was baldly split by that war too and, at a time when the United States Navy was not especially popular in New England, the ship-in-the-line Independence was lying in Boston Harbor. A passer-by directed abusive language at a marine standing guard on the ship, and the marine, Bevans by name, ran his bayonet through the man. Charged with murder, Bevans produced evidence that the marines on the Independence had been ordered to bayonet anyone showing them disrespect. The case was tried before Justice Joseph Story, next to Marshall, the leading judicial figure of those years, who charged that any such order as Bevans had invoked "would be illegal and void," and, if given and put into practice, both the superior and the subordinate would be guilty of murder②. In consequence, Bevans was convicted.
The order allegedly given to Bevans was pretty drastic, and Boston Harbor was not a battlefield; per haps it was not too much to expect the marine to realize that literal compliance might lead to bad trouble. But it is only too easy to conceive of circumstances where the matter might not be at all clear. Does the sub ordinate obey at peril that the order may later be ruled illegal, or is protected unless he has a good reason to doubt its validity?
What was the rule implied by the trail of the commander of the guards?
选项
A、A soldier must obey lawful orders, be he right or wrong.
B、Even if an order is unlawful, the soldier must still obey it.
C、A soldier may or must disobey unlawful orders or he must die.
D、It is the soldier’s duty to obey superior orders whatever they are.
答案
C
解析
细节推断题。根据第二段最后一句“When the command is traitorous,then the obedience to that command is also traitorous”和第三段第一句话“it is the soldier’s duty to obey lawful orders,but he indeed must disobey unlawful orders"我们推知士兵必须遵守合法的命令,否则就是背叛,他可以或者必须不遵守不合法的命令,但同样没有尽到职责而死。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/enGK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
Accordingtowhatyouhavejustsaid,amItounderstandthathisnewpost______noresponsibilitywithitatall?
Ofallthesoldierstheyhadthe______ofbeingthefiercest,themostpatriotic,thetoughest.
Thesoldierfoundhimself______aherowhenhereturnedtohisvillage.
随机试题
A.风中经络证B.风邪犯肺证C.风寒湿痹证D.太阳中风证突起面部麻木,口眼歪斜,微恶风寒,脉浮缓。为
统计标准化
嗜酸性粒细胞增多症外周血嗜酸性粒细胞绝对值大于下列哪一项
女性,33岁,出现右侧腰部剧烈疼痛,经尿常规及B超检查诊断为肾绞痛,应选哪种药物止痛
可以转变为酪氨酸的是脱羧基生成广氨基丁酸的是
监理工程师(包括总监理工程师、驻地监理工程师、专业监理工程师)是一种()。
背景某机电安装公司承接一项炼油厂的塔体群安装工程,工程内容包括:各类塔体就位、各类管道、自动控制和绝热工程等。其中最高塔体为42m,最重塔体102t。合同工期为三个月,合同约定:如果合同工期违约一天罚款10000元,如每提前一天奖励5000元。
一般资料:求助者,女性,66岁,某工厂退休职工。案例介绍:求助者一年前睡觉时突然憋醒,胸闷气短,觉得自己马上就不行了,送入急诊后诊断为呼吸暂停综合症,自己非常后怕,因为自己的哥哥就是夜里突发心脏病去世的,医生也说这种病如不及时发现就会憋死。求助者立
()主要是指秘书人员在自己的职责范围之内,或根据领导的授权,调整和改善部门之间、工作之间、人与人之间的关系,促使机关活动趋向同步化、和谐化,以实现其共同目标的行为过程。
一些人有这样一种思想误区,即只讲“实现自身价值”,不讲“提高自身价值”。人当然天生就有价值,这价值应当重视,但还有待提高。提高不能靠包装与炒作,必须要真正提高质量,具体表现无非就是德与才。这两方面的提高,只有通过克己修身。“玉不琢,不成器”,人不克己修身,
最新回复
(
0
)