首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s duty to give instant obedience to
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s duty to give instant obedience to
admin
2013-10-11
74
问题
Moral responsibility is all very well, but what about military orders? Is it not the soldier’s duty to give instant obedience to orders given by his military superiors? And apart from duty, will not the soldier suffer severe punishment, even death, if he refuses to do what he is ordered to? If, then, a soldier is told by his superior to burn this house or to shoot that prisoner, how can he be held criminally accountable on the ground’ that the burning or shooting was a violation of the laws of war?
These are some of the questions that are raised by the concept commonly called "superior orders", and its use as a defense in war crimes trials. It is an issue that must be as old as the laws of war themselves, and it emerged in legal guise over three centuries ago when, after the Stuart restoration in 1660, the commander of the guards at the trial and execution of Charles I was put on trial for treason and murder. The officer defended himself on the ground "that all I did was as a soldier, by the command of my superior officer whom I must obey or die," but the court gave him short shrift, saying that "When the command is traitorous, then the obedience to that command is also traitorous①."
Though not precisely articulated, the rule that is necessarily implied by this decision is that it is the soldier’s duty to obey lawful orders, but that he may disobey—and indeed must, under some circum stances-unlawful orders. Such has been the law of the United States since the birth of the nation. In 1804, Chief Justice John Marshall declared that superior orders would justify a subordinate’s conduct only "if not to perform a prohibited act," and there are many other early decisions to the same effect.
A strikingly illustrative case occurred in the wake of that conflict which most Englishmen have never heard ( although their troops burned the White House) and which we call the War of 1812. Our country was baldly split by that war too and, at a time when the United States Navy was not especially popular in New England, the ship-in-the-line Independence was lying in Boston Harbor. A passer-by directed abusive language at a marine standing guard on the ship, and the marine, Bevans by name, ran his bayonet through the man. Charged with murder, Bevans produced evidence that the marines on the Independence had been ordered to bayonet anyone showing them disrespect. The case was tried before Justice Joseph Story, next to Marshall, the leading judicial figure of those years, who charged that any such order as Bevans had invoked "would be illegal and void," and, if given and put into practice, both the superior and the subordinate would be guilty of murder②. In consequence, Bevans was convicted.
The order allegedly given to Bevans was pretty drastic, and Boston Harbor was not a battlefield; per haps it was not too much to expect the marine to realize that literal compliance might lead to bad trouble. But it is only too easy to conceive of circumstances where the matter might not be at all clear. Does the sub ordinate obey at peril that the order may later be ruled illegal, or is protected unless he has a good reason to doubt its validity?
What was the rule implied by the trail of the commander of the guards?
选项
A、A soldier must obey lawful orders, be he right or wrong.
B、Even if an order is unlawful, the soldier must still obey it.
C、A soldier may or must disobey unlawful orders or he must die.
D、It is the soldier’s duty to obey superior orders whatever they are.
答案
C
解析
细节推断题。根据第二段最后一句“When the command is traitorous,then the obedience to that command is also traitorous”和第三段第一句话“it is the soldier’s duty to obey lawful orders,but he indeed must disobey unlawful orders"我们推知士兵必须遵守合法的命令,否则就是背叛,他可以或者必须不遵守不合法的命令,但同样没有尽到职责而死。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/enGK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
It’ssaidthemostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringsomething
Theyoungsoldierkilled25enemiesinaclosebattle,forwhichhewas______thetitleofCombatHero.
Iinstantlyenlargedonthedangerofdelay,puttingalltheconsiderationsbeforeherinevery______form.
Hewasbrave;______soldiersfoughtsobravelyinthatbattle.
TheartofpublicspeakingbeganinancientGreeceover2,000yearsago.Now,twitter,instantmessenging,e-mail,blogsandcha
TheartofpublicspeakingbeganinancientGreeceover2,000yearsago.Now,twitter,instantmessenging,e-mail,blogsandcha
随机试题
我国古代建筑最具特色的外观特征是()。
A病毒B细菌C真菌孢子D刺激性气体E奴卡菌造成急性上呼吸道感染的病原体临床最常见的是
多糖荚膜对组织的侵袭作用源于哪种病原体
某新建办公建筑,地上共29层,层高均为4m,地下共2层,其中地下二层为汽车库,地下一层机电设备用房并设有电信进线机房,裙房共4层,5~29层为开敞办公空间,每层开敞办公面积为1200m2,各层平面相同,各层电信竖井位置均上下对应,楼内建筑智能化系统均按智能
下列关于粉状乳化炸药的生产的火灾爆炸危险因素主要来源的说法中不正确的是()
我某出口公司于1月10出运一批货物到鹿特丹,信用证中只规定了有效期而没有明确规定交单议付的最后期限,则我方不应迟于()到银行交单议付。
材料一自党的十六大以来,党中央对民生问题持续关注,在经济发展的基础上,着力保障和改善民生。党的十七大报告提出,努力使全体人民学有所教、劳有所得、病有所医、老有所养、住有所居,推动建设和谐社会。材料二今年《政府工作报告》编列的2008年度中央财政预算有
设f(χ)连续,且f(0)=0,f′(0)≠0.求,其中D:χ2+y2≤t2.
设矩阵A=,B=,且存在矩阵X,使得AX=B+2X.求矩阵X.
在程序代码中将图片文件mypic.jpg装入图片框Picture1的语句是______。
最新回复
(
0
)