首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A Responsibility Revolution "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals," FDR said in 1937, in the mids
A Responsibility Revolution "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals," FDR said in 1937, in the mids
admin
2011-04-04
49
问题
A Responsibility Revolution
"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals," FDR said in 1937, in the midst of the Great Depression. "We know now that it is bad economies." We have learned this all. But even amid the Great Recession of 2009, people have been trading in their SUVs for Priuses, buying record amounts of fair-trade coffee and investing in socially responsible funds at higher rates than ever before. What we are discovering now, in the most uncertain economy since FDR’s time, is that enlightened self-interest—call it a shared sense of responsibility—is good economics.
America has always been a great laboratory of social innovation, from Ben Franklin’s creation of the volunteer fire department and the lending library to the rise of online collectives like Wikipedia and Facebook. Usually it has been an invention, some innovation in commerce—the car, the light bulb, the television—that has changed how we interact with one another as well as how we think of ourselves. We are again entering a period of social change as Americans are recalibrating(重新校准)our sense of what it means to be a citizen, not just through voting or volunteering but also through commerce: by what we buy. There is a new dimension to civic duty that is growing in America—it’s the idea that we can serve not only by spending time in our communities and classrooms but by spending more responsibly. We are starting to put our money where our ideals are.
According to a new TIME poll, more than 6 in 10 Americans have bought organic products since January. Lots of us have bought an energy-efficient light bulb too. And it’s not just the nature of the product but also its source that’s prompting us to buy. Of the 1,003 adults we polled this summer, 82% said they have consciously supported local or neighborhood businesses this year. Nearly 40% said they purchased a product in 2009 because they liked the social or political values of the company that produced it. That’s evidence of a changing mind-set, a new kind of social contract among consumers, business and government. We are seeing the rise of the citizen consumer—and the beginnings of a responsibility revolution.
Corporate America has discovered that social responsibility attracts investment capital as well as customer loyalty, creating a virtuous circle. With global warming on the minds of many consumers, lots of companies are racing to "outgreen" one another, a competition that is good for their bottom lines as well as the environment’s. The most progressive companies are talking about a triple bottom line—profit, planet and people—that focuses on how to run a business while trying to improve environmental and worker conditions.
Many corporations discovered that business was about a lot more than a profit-and-loss statement. At first, the corporate stance was defensive: companies were punished by consumers for unethical behavior. In the 1990s, companies like Nike and Walmart were attacked for discriminatory and unfair labor practices. Companies also began to realize that just as some consumers boycotted products they considered unethical, others would purchase products in part because their manufacturers were responsible.
Some companies embraced the new ethos early on. In 1992, Gap developed sourcing guidelines for its suppliers, and in 1996 the company put in effect a code of conduct for them. Since 2004, Gap has been publishing information about the factories it uses and those it has stopped doing business with. Last year HP followed suit, becoming one of the first computer manufacturers to apply similar transparency to its global supply chain. Timberland now prints a detailed label for its shoes, noting on each pair the company’s material and energy usage
None of this would have happened without consumer demand. Nearly half of Americans in our poll said protecting the environment should be given priority over economic growth—and this comes in the midst of a recession and historic unemployment. And 78% of those polled said they would be willing to pay $ 2,000 more for a car that gets 35 m. p. g. than for a similar one that gets only 25 m. p. g, Of course, consumers are doing their own doing-well-by-doing-good calculation: a more expensive ear that gets better gas mileage will save them money in the long run—and make them feel good about it in the process.
Many companies are trying to reconfigure their DNA as profit seekers. Take Walmart. Once the poster child of corporate ruthlessness, a retailer whose business model of undercutting(廉价销售)all of its competitors would have been applauded by Friedman, Walmart has resolved to change its way of doing business for the sake of the future of the planet. The company has required its suppliers to reduce packaging to protect the environment and is trying to boost sales of energy-efficient light bulbs by giving them more shelf space and better placement in stores. In July it announced it is developing a sustainability index that will one day show consumers at a glance how green its products are.
Other companies are improving their responsibility commitments. Intel, the world’s largest chipmaker, says it plans to increase investment this year in energy efficiency that will help the environment and cut costs. Mars and Cadbury have unveiled plans to increase the amount of cacao (可可豆)they harvest from sustainable sources because it is good for the environment and will also relieve potential shortages in the future. The high-end stroller company Bugaboo just announced it will start contributing 1% of its total revenues to the Global Fund that helps AIDS programs in Africa. That’s 1% of Bugaboo’s revenues, not profits.
One question is: How much of all this is just shrewd marketing to give companies a halo (光环)effect? Participants in these high-profile efforts have been criticized for spending a bundle on marketing. Meanwhile, a New York environmentalist named Jay Westerveld coined the term greenwashing for companies that spin their products as being more environmentally friendly than they really are.
That’s one reason why Walmart’s plan to standardize a sustainability index is so important. If companies are really improving their carbon footprint—and, one hopes, the way they treat their workers—in order to improve their image and engender consumer loyalty, isn’t that a net good thing? And if they are doing it exclusively to help their bottom line, so what? "I don’t care whether companies change for the love of the environment or because of their financial interest," says Geoffrey Heal, a Columbia Business School professor and the author of When Principles Pay. "The most sustainable solution is to have companies responding to financial incentives rather than their own feelings. "
It’s not just big companies that are doing well by doing good. Increasingly, social entrepreneurs are starting companies rather than nonprofits, to capitalize on the power of the market to create public benefit. And some of these entrepreneurs are choosing to form "B Corporations," a new corporate structure that requires enterprises to build into their foundation strong social and environmental standards for their operations. More than 220 companies, whose combined revenue tops $ 1 billion, have become B Corps since their certification began in 2007.
Following the example of GAP, what did HP do last year?
选项
A、It supplied similar transparency to its supply chain.
B、It printed a detailed label for its products.
C、It published information about the factories it uses.
D、It developed sourcing guidelines for its suppliers.
答案
A
解析
根据题干关键词GAP,HP定位到第六段第三句:Last year HP followed suit, becoming one of the first computer manufacturers to apply similar transparency to its global supply chain. 可知,去年HP也尾 随GAP之后,成为了第一个把同样的透明度应用到其全球供给链的电脑生产商,故选A)项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ero7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
______________________(每当遇到这类问题时),mymindgoesblank,andIcanhardlyremembermyowndateofbirth.
A、Fewofthemcanlivelong.B、Mostofthemliveanormallife.C、Fewofthemgetalongwellwitheachother.D、MostOfthemdif
PartⅡReadingComprehension(SkimmingandScanning)Directions:Inthispart,youwillhave15minutestogooverthepassageq
SuggestionsforYourWorkAnnieisalongtimesecretary/receptionistfortwoseniorvicepresidentsatabigcompany.Theyh
A、Theclimate,B、One’ssocialposition.C、Thematerialsavailable.D、Familysize.D信息明示题。文章最后—段提到,决定人们住什么样的房子的因素有climate,one’ss
A、Beunabletobreathe,B、Beovercomebypressure.C、Becomespeechless.D、Bescaredbypressure.B综合推断题。文章最后一段介绍了有助于成功的第四个特质,cal
A、ThepersonwhoisaddictedtotheInternet.B、Thepersonwhoreadseverylabelofthegoods.C、Thepersonwhowantstobuyfru
A、Haveagreatersenseofduty.B、Cangethigherpay.C、Canavoidworkinghard.D、Canavoidbusytraffic.D信息明示题。先读选项再结合文中第二段列出的
A、Hehelpedestablishthecity’sfirstuniversity.B、Hehelpedestablishthecity’sfirstpostoffice.C、Hehelpedestablishthe
Languageisthemeansbywhichthethoughtsandfeelingsofonepersonarecarriedtoanotherpersonsothattheyareunderstood
随机试题
假释的撤销包括以下三种情况:
荣威实业是一家大型企业,经管理层决议,将商品销售由提货制改为发货制,但是在实际执行过程中发生了一些差错。经调查发现,导致差错的原因除了管理上的部分问题外,还存在以下不足:发货单的设计为一式三联,一联为销售部门联,一联为仓库联,一联为运输部门联。根据上述主要
男,25岁,体重50kg,Ⅱ度以上烧伤面积40%,其第1个24小时的前8小时内补液量为
甲房地产开发公司(以下简称甲公司)开发了一住宅和商业混合项目,委托乙房地产经纪公司(以下简称乙公司)代理销售。经与甲公司协商,乙公司为项目住宅部分的目标客户制定了置业计划;对项目商业部分采取先租后售的方式促销。客户李某在项目交房前1年购买了一个建筑面积为4
下列关于计算未来现金流量现值中折现率的说法中,错误的是()。
2013年1月1日,甲公司与乙公司签订一项商品购销合同,乙公司向甲公司销售一台大型机器设备,设备于当日发出。合同约定,甲公司采用分期付款方式购买资产。该设备价款共计900万元,分6期平均支付,首期款项150万元于2013年1月1日支付,其余款项在2013年
根据支付结算法律制度的规定,下列各项结算方式中,可以在同城使用的有()。
2010年4月1日,甲将房屋出租给乙,租期为1年。2010年7月1日,甲在未通知乙的情况下将该房屋出售给丙。根据合同法律制度的规定,下列表述中,正确的有()。
银行业从业人员应当加强学习,不断提高业务知识水平,熟知向客户推荐的金融产品的()、法律关系、业务处理流程及风险控制框架。
以前提条件、相互作用和结果三个因素为基础建立起来的课程评价模式是()
最新回复
(
0
)