首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How Safe Is Your Cell Phone? It takes a little extra work to get in touch with Andrea Boland. The Maine state representative
How Safe Is Your Cell Phone? It takes a little extra work to get in touch with Andrea Boland. The Maine state representative
admin
2012-08-05
44
问题
How Safe Is Your Cell Phone?
It takes a little extra work to get in touch with Andrea Boland. The Maine state representative answers e-mails and lists her business and home phone numbers on the Web. But unlike many politicians surgically attached to their BlackBerrys, she keeps her cell switched off unless she’s expecting a call. And if she has her way, everyone in Maine—and perhaps, eventually, the rest of the US—will similarly think twice before jabbering (急促含糊地说) away on their mobiles.
In March, Maine’s legislature will begin debating a bill she submitted that would require manufacturers to put a warning label on every cell phone sold in the state declaring, "This device emits electromagnetic radiation, exposure to which may cause brain cancer." Her warning would continue: "Users, especially children and pregnant women, should keep this device away from the head and body."
For those of you now eyeing your cell phones suspiciously, it’s worth noting that both the National Cancer Institute and the World Health Organization say there isn’t evidence to support the assertion that cell phones are a public-health threat. But a number of scientists are worried that there has been a dangerous rush to declare cell phones safe, using studies they feel are inadequate and too often weighted toward the wireless industry’s interests. An analysis published by University of Washington neurologist Henry Lai determined that far more independent studies than industry-funded studies have found at least some type of biological effect from cell-phone exposure.
Several countries—including Finland, Israel and France—have issued guidelines for cell-phone use. And San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, who began researching the issue when his wife was expecting their first child, is hoping his city will adopt legislation that would have manufacturers print radiation information on cell-phone packaging and manuals and require retailers to display the data on the sales floor.
With 270 million Americans and 4 billion people around the world using cell phones—and more signing up every day—a strong link between mobiles and cancer could have major public-health implications. As cell phones make and take calls, they emit low-level radio-frequency (RF) radiation. Stronger than FM radio signals, these RF waves are still a billionth the intensity of known carcinogenic (会致癌的) radiation like X-rays.
The wireless industry contends that RF radiation lacks the strength to alter molecules in the human body; the Federal Communications Commission maximum for cell-phone-signal exposure is intended to; prevent RF radiation from heating tissue to the point that cells are damaged. Cell-phone RF radiation’s "effect on the body, at least at this time, appears to be insufficient to produce genetic damage typically; associated with developing cancer," Dr. Robert Hoover, director of the National Cancer Institute’s Epidemiology and Biostatistics Program, testified at a 2008 congressional hearing.
But the body of research is far from conclusive. In 1995, Lai co-wrote a study showing that a single two-hour exposure of RF radiation—at levels considered safe by the US standards—produced the sort of genetic damage in rats’ brain cells that can lead to cancer. Though subsequent researchers—often funded in part by the wireless industry—failed to replicate Lai’s results, a 2004 European Union-funded study reported similar findings.
Dariusz Leszczynski, a research professor at Finland’s Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority in Helsinki, has done studies indicating that RF radiation may create a stress reaction in the cells that line blood vessels, leading to a dangerous damage in the blood-brain barrier. "Mobile-phone radiation may be able to indirectly hurt cells, perhaps by interfering with their ability to repair normal DNA damage," he says. "Given the scientific uncertainty, it’s premature to say the use of cell phones is safe." If RF radiation increases the chances of developing brain cancer, it should show up in long-term studies of cell-phone users. But many epidemiological studies have found no clear connection, including a 2007 Danish Cancer Society study of 421 000 cell-phone users, which led many in the media to conclude that mobiles are harmless. To date, "peer-reviewed scientific evidence has overwhelmingly indicated that wireless devices do not pose a risk," says John Walls, a spokesman for CTIA, a global wireless association.
There are problems with many of these studies, however. For starters, the Danish one—which reviewed the medical records of people who had signed up for cell phones from 1982 to 1995—didn’t include all the business users, who were among the earliest adopters and most intensive users, because they were not billed directly.
Also, the study looked only at tumors that were diagnosed by 2002—not long after daily use of cell phones became widespread. Brain cancers can take several decades to develop, so it might be many years before a measurable bump in cancer rates shows up. "The latency period we have is far too short," says Dr. Siegal Sadetzki, a cancer researcher at Israel’s Gertner Institute whose epidemiological studies have found some connections between cell-phone use and salivary-gland (唾液腺) tumors. "And today, people are using the phone much more heavily."
Sadetzki served as Israel’s principal investigator in the Interphone study, which was conducted over the past several years by 13 countries, most of them European. The Interphone results initially were to be published in 2006, but the final report has been postponed repeatedly, and the study investigators are, reportedly deeply divided. In the US, which isn’t one of the Interphone countries, the National Toxicology; Program is launching studies of the health effects of cell phones. But peer-reviewed results won’t be available until at least 2014.
That’s a long time to wait for definitive data. The good news is that there are easy ways for those concerned about RF radiation to cut down on exposure. Using your cell phone’s speaker or connecting a wired headset—while keeping the handset away from your body—drastically reduces RF exposure. (Bluetooth headsets help too, but they still emit some radiation.) And given the potentially more serious risks for children, who have thinner skulls than adults, parents might want to wait before handing teens their first phone—or at least ensure they use it mostly for texting.
Meanwhile, a start-up, Pong Research, is selling cell-phone cases that significantly reduce radiation exposure by channeling waves away from the head. "I think it’s best to avoid as much of the risk as possible until the verdict is in," says Alfred Wong, Pong’s chief scientist and a professor emeritus of physics at UCLA.
That’s exactly what Boland and other advocates of warning labels are arguing. It’s true that cell-phone use has yet to be linked to cancer risk. "Scientifically speaking, we don’t have the proof yet," says Sadetzki. "But as a public-health concern, I’m saying we definitely should adopt precautions."
It is reported that the Interphone study report has been put off repeatedly because the study investigators of are______.
选项
答案
deeply divided
解析
同义转述题。定位句明确提到,对讲机研究结果最初应在2006年公布,但是最终报告被推迟了许多次,据称研究调查人员分歧很大。题干中的It is reported是对定位句中reportedly的同义转述,因此答案为deeply divided。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/f6b7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
PartⅡReadingComprehension(SkimmingandScanning)Directions:Inthispart,youwillhave15minutestogooverthepassageq
Itwouldbeinterestingtodiscoverhowmanyyoungpeoplegotouniversitywithoutanyclearideaofwhattheyaregoingtodoa
A、Weshouldeatmoremeatthanvegetables.B、Weshouldeatmorevegetablesthanmeat.C、Weshouldeatdifferentkindsofvegetab
A、Theofficewasclosedthefirsttimeshewentthere.B、Thecomputerwasoutofserviceatthattime.C、Shedidn’thaveaccepta
WhenGarrettstayedathome,shewaspreventedfromexpectingtoreturntoscienceby______.Inadditiontotheone-yearpostd
A、EveryoneenjoyedhimselfatJohn’sparty.B、Thewomandidn’tenjoyJohn’spartiesatall.C、ThewomanhasneverattendedJohn’
Areyouasocialbutterfly,ordoyoupreferbeingattheedgeofagroupoffriends?Eitherway,yourgenesandevolutionmayp
Historyhasdemonstratedthatcountrieswithdifferentsocialsystemsandideologiescanjoinhandsinmeetingthecommonchalle
Weneedthingsconsumed,burnedup,wornout,replacedand______ataneverincreasingrate.
It’swhenyouareoutofcellphonerangeandfarthestfromhelpwhenyou’regoingtoneedurgentassistance.Thinkofbeingaboa
随机试题
下列关于保税仓库的叙述,不正确的是()
糖皮质激素冲击疗法适用于
患者,男,20岁。输血10分钟后出现头胀、四肢麻木、腰背部剧痛、呼吸急促、血压下降、黄疸。患者尿液中可含有
引起脑萎缩的最常见原因是( )。
治疗原则主要讨论治疗疾病的基本原则和一些具体的治疗方法:如早治防变、治病求本、扶正祛邪、调整阴阳、调理气血、调理脏腑以及因时、因地、因人制宜等内容。心脏病患者患感冒后先治疗感冒,属于
三国两晋南北朝时期随着社会政治经济关系的变化,法律内容也有所发展,主要表现在礼法结合进一步发展。下列哪些情形属于具体表现?()
下列关于工程施工合同索赔,程序描述正确的有( )。
2017年11月,A公司赊销一批商品给B公司,含税价为15万元。由于B公司发生财务困难,无法偿付该应付账款。2018年6月1日,A公司与B公司进行债务重组,A公司同意B公司以其普通股3万股抵偿该项债务,该股票每股面值为1元,每股市价为4元。A公司对该项债权
通货紧缩是指由于货币供应量的减少或货币供应量的增长滞后于生产增长的幅度,以致引起对商品和劳务的总需求小于总供给,从而导致物价总水平下降的现象。据此回答下题:近年来,我国为化解通货紧缩采取了如下有效措施_______。①中国人民银行连续降息②
下列说法不正确的是____________。
最新回复
(
0
)