首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
•Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business. •For each question 15—20, mark one letter (
•Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business. •For each question 15—20, mark one letter (
admin
2013-02-14
38
问题
•Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business.
•For each question 15—20, mark one letter (A, B, C, or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Since the days of Henry Ford’s dominance of the car market in the 1920s up to the present day, the car industry has continued to grow. Some companies, such as British Leyland, failed to survive the turbulent business world of the 1970s despite being government-owned. During the 1960s and 1970s, as growth in profit became more difficult to achieve due to increased competition, mainly from the Japanese, the industry turned to efficient production methods in order to create a competitive advantage. However, once all the major players in the industry had become as efficient as possible, developing a cost advantage was more difficult to achieve. In addition, car companies from Asia, such as Daewoo, Samsung and Kia, have developed cheaper, more affordable alternatives for the discerning western buyers. Such car companies are part-funded by their respective governments but enjoy considerably lower labor costs.
Increasing productive capacity has led to car companies aiming to use economies of scale as the main way of reducing cost, although this has unfortunately led to businesses having surplus capacity. This spare capacity occurs when the industry as a whole expands ahead of, or in anticipation of, a growth in customer demand. Such growth in capacity has meant that supply outstrips demand by some 30%, i.e., car companies could cut back on their capacity levels by 30%, and still meet all customer demands.
The result has been a series of joint agreements and mergers between car companies, with a view to either using capacity, or losing capacity altogether by selling off parts of a business. The other problem is the high cost of developing new vehicles: the standard response to the high cost is to either rejuvenate or re-launch old vehicles with new technology. But there are enough companies developing new models that any business, which does not, stands to lose out. The main fear in the car industry is over-capacity—experts predict that by 2001, the industry may produce 23 million cars more than it can sell!
In 1998 there was a spate of company mergers—e.g. In January 1999, Ford paid £4 billion for Volvo’s car division; Volvo claimed that it needed economies of scale, allowing it to focus on buses, engines and aerospace and to acquire shares in two major truck-making businesses. Ford intended to distribute Volvos with its own cars and hoped to use Volvo’s reputation for technological excellence to develop new cars, using common research platforms to save money.
Renault, on the other hand, announced a joint agreement with Nissan, the debt-ridden Japanese company, to purchase a 37% stake. For Renault, the problem was not over-capacity, but rather the lack of product range. Renault was 44% owned by the French government, which obviously wanted to protect one of its major companies and wealth creators. However, Renault had concentrated its major marketing effort on domestic demand in France; as the domestic market fell, profit tumbled. The expiry in 1999 of the "gentlemen’s agreement" which limited car sales from Japan was probably the main reason for teaming up with Nissan. Nissan, however, had borrowed approximately £15 billion in order to expand its productive capacity and had lost money in six of the last seven years. One estimate put 1998’s losses at nearly £1 billion. The cost savings for both companies are not likely to occur until 2002, resulting mainly from purchasing economies of scale. Renault seems to have got caught between the large manufacturers who achieve economies of scale and the smaller specialist manufacturers.
Once all the major companies in the car industry had become as efficient as possible,
选项
A、they turned to use economies of scales as the main way of reducing cost.
B、there came increased productive capacity.
C、there was no way to reduce cost.
D、the main fear in the car industry became over-capacity.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/fF7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Accordingtotheman,whatdoesheneedtodothismorning?
Accordingtothespeaker,whatisthecompany’spriority?
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.(Thecandidatechoosesonetop
Question询问
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
TaskOne-Job•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listedA-H.•Foreachextract,choosethejobeachsp
•YouwillheartheChairmanoftheBusinessBroadcastingCommitteeofatelevisioncompany.Heisaddressingameetingofthec
•Readthetextbelowaboutthelogistics.•Inmostofthelines41-52thereisoneextraword.Itiseithergrammaticallyinco
•Readthetextbelowaboutthelogistics.•Inmostofthelines41-52thereisoneextraword.Itiseithergrammaticallyinco
随机试题
美国作家海明威的代表作有()。
某旅游商品销售商店强制游客消费,请问该商店违反的是合同法原则中的()。
常用的反映肾小球滤过功能的血清标志物为
某工程,建设单位与甲施工单位签订了施工总承包合同,并委托一家监理单位实施施工阶段监理。经建设单位同意,甲施工单位将工程划分为A1、A2标段,并将A2标段分包给乙施工单位。根据监理工作需要,监理单位设立了投资控制组、进度控制组、质量控制组、安全管理组、合同管
溶于挥发性有机溶剂中的丙烯酸聚合物,丙烯酸聚合物占溶液总重量的45%
甲公司是乙公司的全资子公司,2015年10月1日甲公司向乙公司出售一项专有技术,该专有技术在甲公司的账面价值为2100万元,公允价值为1500万元。双方预计此专有技术尚可使用5年,预计净残值为0,采用直线法计提摊销。甲、乙公司适用的所得税税率均为25%,不
项目进度计划(ProjectScheduling)是根据实际条件和合同要求,以拟建项目的竣工投产或交付使用时间为目标,按照合理的顺序安排的实施日程,是执行项目工作和达到里程碑目标的日期计划,其实质是把各工作的时间估计值反映在逻辑关系图上。项目进度计划的制
根据《中华人民共和国未成年人保护法》的规定,学校、幼儿园的教职员应当尊重未成年人的(),不得对未成年人和儿童实施体罚、变相体罚。
某地发生登革热疫情,单位让你负责处理疫情,但当地民众对此不以为然,对如何防控疾病也没有认真对待,请问你该如何处理?(2011年7月23日海南省公务员面试真题)
Afterthestormnothing______ofthehouse.Itreally______usmuchtothinkabout.
最新回复
(
0
)