首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
•Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business. •For each question 15—20, mark one letter (
•Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business. •For each question 15—20, mark one letter (
admin
2013-02-14
47
问题
•Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business.
•For each question 15—20, mark one letter (A, B, C, or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Since the days of Henry Ford’s dominance of the car market in the 1920s up to the present day, the car industry has continued to grow. Some companies, such as British Leyland, failed to survive the turbulent business world of the 1970s despite being government-owned. During the 1960s and 1970s, as growth in profit became more difficult to achieve due to increased competition, mainly from the Japanese, the industry turned to efficient production methods in order to create a competitive advantage. However, once all the major players in the industry had become as efficient as possible, developing a cost advantage was more difficult to achieve. In addition, car companies from Asia, such as Daewoo, Samsung and Kia, have developed cheaper, more affordable alternatives for the discerning western buyers. Such car companies are part-funded by their respective governments but enjoy considerably lower labor costs.
Increasing productive capacity has led to car companies aiming to use economies of scale as the main way of reducing cost, although this has unfortunately led to businesses having surplus capacity. This spare capacity occurs when the industry as a whole expands ahead of, or in anticipation of, a growth in customer demand. Such growth in capacity has meant that supply outstrips demand by some 30%, i.e., car companies could cut back on their capacity levels by 30%, and still meet all customer demands.
The result has been a series of joint agreements and mergers between car companies, with a view to either using capacity, or losing capacity altogether by selling off parts of a business. The other problem is the high cost of developing new vehicles: the standard response to the high cost is to either rejuvenate or re-launch old vehicles with new technology. But there are enough companies developing new models that any business, which does not, stands to lose out. The main fear in the car industry is over-capacity—experts predict that by 2001, the industry may produce 23 million cars more than it can sell!
In 1998 there was a spate of company mergers—e.g. In January 1999, Ford paid £4 billion for Volvo’s car division; Volvo claimed that it needed economies of scale, allowing it to focus on buses, engines and aerospace and to acquire shares in two major truck-making businesses. Ford intended to distribute Volvos with its own cars and hoped to use Volvo’s reputation for technological excellence to develop new cars, using common research platforms to save money.
Renault, on the other hand, announced a joint agreement with Nissan, the debt-ridden Japanese company, to purchase a 37% stake. For Renault, the problem was not over-capacity, but rather the lack of product range. Renault was 44% owned by the French government, which obviously wanted to protect one of its major companies and wealth creators. However, Renault had concentrated its major marketing effort on domestic demand in France; as the domestic market fell, profit tumbled. The expiry in 1999 of the "gentlemen’s agreement" which limited car sales from Japan was probably the main reason for teaming up with Nissan. Nissan, however, had borrowed approximately £15 billion in order to expand its productive capacity and had lost money in six of the last seven years. One estimate put 1998’s losses at nearly £1 billion. The cost savings for both companies are not likely to occur until 2002, resulting mainly from purchasing economies of scale. Renault seems to have got caught between the large manufacturers who achieve economies of scale and the smaller specialist manufacturers.
Once all the major companies in the car industry had become as efficient as possible,
选项
A、they turned to use economies of scales as the main way of reducing cost.
B、there came increased productive capacity.
C、there was no way to reduce cost.
D、the main fear in the car industry became over-capacity.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/fF7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Accordingtotheman,whatdoesheneedtodothismorning?
Accordingtothespeaker,whathasbeencompleted?
Iscapitalmarketimportantornot?Why?Canyougiveexplanationaboutit?
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
•YouwillheartheChairmanoftheBusinessBroadcastingCommitteeofatelevisioncompany.Heisaddressingameetingofthec
•YouwillheartheChairmanoftheBusinessBroadcastingCommitteeofatelevisioncompany.Heisaddressingameetingofthec
•YouwillheartheChairmanoftheBusinessBroadcastingCommitteeofatelevisioncompany.Heisaddressingameetingofthec
TASKONE—ADVANTAGE•Forquestions13—17,matchtheextractswiththeadvantages,listedA—H.•Foreachextract,choosetheadv
TASKONE—ADVANTAGE•Forquestions13—17,matchtheextractswiththeadvantages,listedA—H.•Foreachextract,choosetheadv
•Readthetextbelowaboutthelogistics.•Inmostofthelines41-52thereisoneextraword.Itiseithergrammaticallyinco
随机试题
人体是一个庞大的共生体。人体皮肤表面、口腔、呼吸道、肠道________着大量微生物,它们的数量是人体本身细胞的数十倍,编码的基因是人体基因的100倍。每个人的身体里都会有微生物留存的痕迹,而人体的健康会与体内的菌群________。人们将特定环境中包括微
关于胶片对照片对比度的影响,叙述错误的是
在实际估价中,建筑物折旧一般包括()。
某厂的机电安装工程由A安装公司承包施工,土建工程由B建筑公司承包施工,A安装公司、B建筑公司均按照《建设工程施工合同(承包文本)》与建设单位签订了施工合同。合同约定:A安装公司负责工程设备和材料的采购,合同工期为215天(3月1日到9月30日),工程提前1
根据《建筑安装工程费用项目组成》(建标[2013]44号文)以定额人工费为基础计算的规费有()。
假设零息债券在到期日的价值为1000美元,偿还期为25年,如果投资者要求的年收益率为15%,则其现值为()美元。
下列各项中,影响企业营业利润的有()。
公司领导从单位乘车出门开会,以60公里/小时的速度行驶了3小时,突然发现忘记带会议文件了,随即通知秘书送来,自己在原处等待。秘书从单位出发以90公里/小时的速度给领导送文件,则经过几个小时秘书将文件送至领导处?()
校园招聘的准备工作包括()。
Thecostisgoingupforjustabouteverything,andcollegetuitionisnoexception.Accordingtoanationwidesurveypublished
最新回复
(
0
)