首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
It’s very interesting to note where the debate about diversity(多样化) is taking place. It is taking place primarily in political c
It’s very interesting to note where the debate about diversity(多样化) is taking place. It is taking place primarily in political c
admin
2009-05-24
81
问题
It’s very interesting to note where the debate about diversity(多样化) is taking place. It is taking place primarily in political circles. Here at the College Fund, we have a lot of contact with top corporate(公司的) leaders; none of them is talking about getting rid of those instruments that produce diversity. In fact, they say that if their companies are to compete in the global village and in the global market place, diversity is an imperative. They also say that the need for talented, skilled Americans means we have to expand the pool of potential employees. And in looking at where birth rates are growing and at where the population is shifting, corporate America understands that expanding the pool means promoting policies that help provide skills to more minorities, more women and more immigrants. Corporate leaders know that if that doesn’t occur in our society, they will not have the engineers, the scientists, the lawyers, or the business managers they will need.
Likewise, I don’t hear people in the academy saying, "Let’s go backward. Let’s go back to the good old days, when we had a meritocracy(不拘一格选人才)" (which was never true—we never had a meritocracy, although we’ve come closer to it in the last 30 years). I recently visited a great little college in New York where the campus has doubled its minority population in the last six years. I talked with an African American who has been a professor there for a long time, and she remembers that when she first joined the community, there were fewer than a handful of minorities on campus. Now, all of us feel the university is better because of the diversity. So where we hear this debate is primarily in political circles and in the media—not in corporate board rooms or on college campuses.
选项
A、superficial
B、remarkable
C、debatable
D、essential
答案
D
解析
四个选项的词意分别为:"表面的";"令人惊奇的";"有争议的";"基本的,重要的"。从该词出现的语境第一段第五行出现的if从句(如果要…)判断,D项与之吻合。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/fHYi777K
本试题收录于:
GCT工程硕士(英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
GCT工程硕士(英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Whatkindofpersonneedsthisservice?Ifyouhave20pagestobetyped,howlongdoesittaketogetthemfinished?
Thepassageismainlyconcernedwiththe______.Theauthormentionsfoldingchairsinthefirstparagraphinorderto______.
Passenger:Taxi!(Acabstopsandhegoesin).Cabdriver:______?Passenger:King’sHotelonNorthStreet.
Thedifferencesinlivingstandardsaroundtheworldarevast.In1993,theaverageAmericanhadanincomeofabout$25,000.In
Rebecca:______.Dora:Really?Well,personally,Ithinkhewearsthewrongcolors.Actuallylightcolorsdon’treallysuithim.
Notsolongagoalmostanystudentwhosuccessfullycompletedauniversitydegreecould,findagoodcareerquiteeasily.Compan
Accordingtoasurvey,whichwasbasedontheresponsesofover188,000students,today’straditional-agecollegefreshmenare"
Alice:Tedaskedmetogotothebeachthisweekend.What’syourplan?Laura:I’vetoworkovertime.SometimesIenvyyoualot.
AttackinganincreasinglypopularInternetbusinesspractice,aconsumerwatchdoggroupMondayfiledacomplaintwiththeFedera
Atsometimeinyourlifeyoumayhaveastrongdesiretodosomethingstrangeorterrible.However,chancesarethatyoudon’t
随机试题
甲公司属于工业企业,为增值税一般纳税人,由A、B、C三位股东于2002年12月31日共同出资,出资比例分别为40%、35%和25%。有关资料如下:(1)2002年12月31日三位股东的出资方式及出资额如下表所示(各位股东的出资已全部到位,并经中国注册会计
可制备成舌下含化片的方式给药的药物是
受理执业医师注册申请的卫生行政部门,对应当准予注册的,准予注册期限是自收到申请之日起
某癌症患者,穿刺取肝组织,镜下发现癌细胞与正常肝细胞相似,有异型性,有腺管样结构。应诊为
女,29岁,因急性腹痛8小时入院。入院诊断急腹症(原因待诊)。对该病人的护理措施不正确的是
空调风管和管道的绝热材料,无特殊规定时,可采用()。
(2008年)作用水头相同时,孔口的过流量要比相同直径的管嘴过流量()。
质量风险导致的损失包括()
下列关于证券公司合规负责人的说法中,正确的有()。Ⅰ.合规负责人应对证券公司经营管理行为的合法合规性进行审查、监督或者检查Ⅱ.独立董事可担任合规负责人Ⅲ.合规负责人由股东大会决定聘任Ⅳ.证券公司解聘合规负责人,应当有正当理由,自
宋老师发现了教学中的某一问题并对其描述,继而形成解决计划并实施,随后搜集数据和材料以分析计划的有效性,最后把结果应用于处理后续课堂中出现的类似问题。这种研究的方法是()。
最新回复
(
0
)