2. 外语
  3. Global warming may or not be the great environmental crisis of the 21st century, but— regardless of whether it is or isn’t—we wo

Global warming may or not be the great environmental crisis of the 21st century, but— regardless of whether it is or isn’t—we wo

admin2022-12-30  9
问题     Global warming may or not be the great environmental crisis of the 21st century, but— regardless of whether it is or isn’t—we won’t do much about it. We will argue over it and may even, as a nation, make some fairly solemn-sounding commitments to avoid it. But the more dramatic and meaningful these commitments seem, the less likely they are to be observed.
    Al Gore calls global warming an "inconvenient truth" ,’as if merely recognizing it could put us on a path to a solution. But the real truth is that we don’t know enough to relieve global warming, and—without major technological breakthroughs—we can’t do much about it.
    From 2003 to 2050, the world’s population is projected to grow from 6.4 billion to 9.1 billion, a 42% increase. If energy use per person and technology remain the same, total energy use and greenhouse gas emissions (mainly, CO2) will be 42% higher in 2050. But that’s too low, because societies that grow richer use more energy. We need economic growth unless we condemn the world’s poor to their present poverty and freeze everyone else’s living standards. With modest growth, energy use and greenhouse emissions more than double by 2050.
    No government will adopt rigid restrictions on economic growth and personal freedom (limits on electricity usage, driving and travel) that might cut back global warming. Still, politicians want to show they’re "doing something". Consider the Kyoto Protocol (《京都议定书》). It allowed countries that joined to punish those that didn’t. But it hasn’t reduced CO2 emissions (up about 25% since 1990), and many signatories (签署国) didn’t adopt tough enough policies to hit their 2008-2012 targets.
    The practical conclusion is that if global warming is a potential disaster, the only solution is new technology. Only an aggressive research and development program might find ways of breaking our dependence on fossil fuels or dealing with it.
    The trouble with the global warming debate is that it has become a moral problem when it’s really an engineering one. The inconvenient truth is that if we don’t solve the engineering problem, we’re helpless.
What’s the reason that greenhouse emissions will more than double by 2050?
选项 A、Economic growth.
B、Wasteful use of energy.
C、The widening gap between the rich and the poor.
D、The rapid advances of science and technology.
答案A
解析 由题干中的double by 2050定位到第三段最后两句。细节辨认题。由定位句可知，除非我们强迫世上的穷人维持贫困现状，限制其他人生活水平的提高，否则我们就需要经济增长。按照一个小幅的增长来计算，能源消耗和温室气体排放量到2050年将是现在的两倍多。由此可知，经济增长是原因，故正确答案为A)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/favD777K
0

大学英语四级

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)