首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2013-12-06
45
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very longwave-lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans".
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that electromagnetic fields present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
It can be inferred from physical phenomenon______.
选项
A、the force of the electromagnetic field is too weak to be harmful
B、the force of the electromagnetic field is weaker than the electric field that the cells generate
C、electromagnetic field may affect health
D、only more powerful radiation can knock electron out of human body
答案
A
解析
答案在第四段第二、三句,当电流通过电缆,产生磁场,对周围物体产生(影响)力。许多年来,科学家把任何有关“这些力可能有害的想法”置于一边(不予考虑),主要是因为它们(所产生的力)非常弱。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/fcU3777K
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
门静脉高压症的病理变化中,下列哪项是正确的
下列有关球后溃疡的描述,正确的有
Severalclassesofbittercitruscompoundhavelookedpromisingasanticanceragentsinlaboratorytests.Anewstudyindicates
Imagineadiseasespreadingacrosstheglobe,killingmostlymiddle-agedpeopleorleavingthemchronicallydisabled.Thenoned
Thetruthmaywellbeself-evidentthatallhumansarecreatedequal,butonethingourMakerdidnotendowuswithequallyist
Ifyouarecaughtinadownpour,itisbettertorunforshelterthanwalk,researchersintheUSadvise.Thismaysoundobvious
Convincingthepublictofollowhealthadvicecanbetoughandtime-consuming.Thismaybewhychangestohealthmessagesareof
Duringthepast30yearsorso,healthcarehasincreasinglybecomeaformofbusiness.Inaddition,theenvironmentsurroundin
BlackAmericanshaveservedwithhonorineveryAmericanmilitaryaction,thoughthisfactisoftenomittedinhistorybooks.Ev
A、Becauseitisrequiredofallsciencemajors.B、BecauseitwasmadeinNewYorkCity.C、Becauseitwillbeshownafterworking
随机试题
《中华人民共和国药品管理法》的适用范封是
初起恶寒高热流清涕,继则咽痛发热口渴苔黄,此属高热神昏烦渴多日,突见肢冷,汗出脉微,此属
"主运化"功能有错误的一项是
下列关于门诊病历的书写要求,说法错误的是
低钾血症的心电图特征性表现()
施工过程中,若出现需返工弥补的工程质量问题,监理工程师应及时()。
山西省因居太行山之西得名,简称“晋”,古称河西,省会太原市。()
你们单位的局长经常越过科长给你下达任务,对此科长很不高兴,请问你要怎么处理这样的情况?
我们今天的劳动可以分为两部分,一部分是为得到今天生存所必需的生活资料而付出的劳动;一部分是为未来的发展而预先支付的劳动。当这两部分的比例前者木于后者时,说明我们的劳动尚处在较低级阶段;而后者远大于前者时,则说明我们的劳动层次得到了很大提高。因此,只有通过社
事实显示害怕乘飞机是没有理由的。仅在1986年,在高速公路上有46000人丧命。但是从1980年到现在,在国内主要航线平均每年仅有77人死亡,地区航线稍微高一点。如果上面引用的证据都正确,为评价论据的有力性,下面哪一项最需要知道?
最新回复
(
0
)