首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
admin
2010-03-25
30
问题
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one story fits all of Asia. This is, of course, silly. all of these economies plunged into economic crisis within a few months of each other, so they must have had something in common.
In fact, the logic of catastrophe was pretty much the same in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. (Japan is a very different story. ) In each case investors -- mainly, but not entirely, foreign banks who had made short-term loans -- all tried to pull their money out at the same time. The result was a Combined banking and currency crisis: a banking crisis because no bank can convert all its assets into cash on short notice; a currency crisis because panicked investors were trying not only to convert long term assets into cash, but to convert baht or rupiah into dollars. In the face of the stampede, governments had no good options. If they let their currencies plunge, inflation would soar and companies that had borrowed in dollars would go bankrupt; if they tried to support their currencies by pushing up interest rates, the same firms would probably go bust from the combination of debt burden and recession. In practice, countries split the difference -- and paid a heavy price regardless.
Was the crisis a punishment for bad economic management? Like most cliches, the catchphrase "crony capitalism" has prospered because it gets at something real: excessively cozy relationships between government and business really did lead to a lot of bad investments. The still primitive financial structure of Asian business also made the economies peculiarly vulnerable to a loss of confidence. But the punishment was surely disproportionate to the crime, and many investments that look foolish in retrospect seemed sensible at the time.
Given that there were no good policy options, was the policy response mainly on the right track? There was frantic blame-shifting when everything in Asia seemed to be going wrong; now there is a race to claim credit when some things have started to go right. The International Monetary Fund points to Korea’s recovery -- and more generally to the fact that the sky didn’t fall after all -- as proof that its policy recommendations were right. Never mind that other IMF clients have done far worse, and that the economy of Malaysia- which refused IMF help, and horrified respectable opinion by imposing capital controls -- also seems to be on the mend. Malaysia’s Prime Minister, by contrast, claims full credit for any good news -- even though neighbouring economies also seem to have bottomed out.
The truth is that an observer without any ax to grind would probably conclude that none of the policies adopted either on or in defiance Of the IMF’s advice made much difference either way. Budget policies, interest rate policies, banking reform -- whatever countries tried, just about all the capital that could flee, did. And when there was no more money to run, the natural recuperative powers of the economies finally began to prevail. At best, the money doctors who purported to offer cures provided a helpful bedside manner; at worst, they were like medieval physicians who. prescribed bleeding as a remedy for all ills.
Will the patients stage a full recovery? It depends on exactly what you mean by "full". South Korea’s industrial production is already above its pre-crisis level; but in the spring of 1997 anyone who had predicted zero growth in Korean industry over the next two years would have been regarded as a reckless doomsayer. So if by recovery you mean not just a return to growth, but one that brings the region’s performance back to something like what people used to regard as the Asian norm, they have a long way to go.
"Pundits" in the first paragraph is closest in meaning to
选项
A、economists.
B、bankers.
C、industrialists.
D、financiers.
答案
A
解析
这是道词汇推断题。根据上下文,pundits在文中指经济学家。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gEqO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheGuidfordFour,freedlastweekafterspending15yearsinprisonforcrimestheydidnotcommit,wouldalmostcertainlyhave
A、Themanishurtbadly.B、Michiganteamisoneofthetopfootballteamsinthecountry.C、Themanwillbacktomorrowafternoon
Thetouristtradeisbooming.Withallthiscomingandgoing,you’dexpectgreaterunderstandingtodevelopbetweenthenations
Studentsshouldbehelpedbyacoursethatconsidersthecomputer’svariousimpactsoncommerce,economy,science,technology,c
Howmanyreallysufferasaresultoflabormarketproblems?Thisisoneofthemostcriticalyetcontentioussocialpolicyques
A、Twoimportanttestsofanewairlinerbeforeitisputintouse.B、Howtocarryouttanktestinthewater.C、Howpilotscarry
TherearemanytheoriesaboutthebeginningofdramainancientGreece.Theonemostwidelyacceptedtodayisbasedontheassum
Extract1Henri-Lloyd,theUKsailingclothesbrand,islaunchinganewwomen’sfashionfootwearcollection.Spanningeight
Howmuchmuseumgoersknowaboutartmakeslittledifferenceinhowtheyengagewithexhibits,accordingtoastudybyaGermanc
ThenumberofpeopleemigratingfromIrelandiscurrentlyestimatedat30,000annually.Thereisnodoubtthatthebulkofyoung
随机试题
“传日:其身正,不令而行;其身不正,虽令不从”中的“传”指()
患者,男性,63岁。突发头痛,左侧偏瘫,CT平扫:右侧基底节区肾形髟高密度影,边缘清晰,周围可见带状低密度影,CT值50~80HU,右侧侧脑室受压。本病例最可能诊断为
男,65岁.。因声音嘶哑、反应迟缓、浮肿入院,诊断为慢性淋巴性甲状腺炎、甲减,有黏液性水肿、心包积液。经左旋甲状腺素钠(L—T4)每日25μg起始,逐渐递增剂量治疗后,上述症状、体征已基本消失。调整剂量是依据()
工程项目风险管理工作中,风险量是衡量()的一个变量。
FIDIC施工合同条件下,预付款保函( )。
银行卡通过联网的各类终端交易的原始单据至少应保留一年备查。()
根据课堂纪律形成的原因,课堂纪律分成哪四种类型?
研究操作系统的观点有多种,它们分别是()。
下图是校园网某台主机在命令行模式下执行某个命令时用sniffer捕获的数据包。请根据图中信息回答下列问题。该主机上执行的命令是[20]。
为了用ISDN技术实现电话拨号方式接入Internet,除了要具备一条直拨外线和一台性能合适的计算机外,另一个关键硬件设备是
最新回复
(
0
)