首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
admin
2010-03-25
64
问题
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one story fits all of Asia. This is, of course, silly. all of these economies plunged into economic crisis within a few months of each other, so they must have had something in common.
In fact, the logic of catastrophe was pretty much the same in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. (Japan is a very different story. ) In each case investors -- mainly, but not entirely, foreign banks who had made short-term loans -- all tried to pull their money out at the same time. The result was a Combined banking and currency crisis: a banking crisis because no bank can convert all its assets into cash on short notice; a currency crisis because panicked investors were trying not only to convert long term assets into cash, but to convert baht or rupiah into dollars. In the face of the stampede, governments had no good options. If they let their currencies plunge, inflation would soar and companies that had borrowed in dollars would go bankrupt; if they tried to support their currencies by pushing up interest rates, the same firms would probably go bust from the combination of debt burden and recession. In practice, countries split the difference -- and paid a heavy price regardless.
Was the crisis a punishment for bad economic management? Like most cliches, the catchphrase "crony capitalism" has prospered because it gets at something real: excessively cozy relationships between government and business really did lead to a lot of bad investments. The still primitive financial structure of Asian business also made the economies peculiarly vulnerable to a loss of confidence. But the punishment was surely disproportionate to the crime, and many investments that look foolish in retrospect seemed sensible at the time.
Given that there were no good policy options, was the policy response mainly on the right track? There was frantic blame-shifting when everything in Asia seemed to be going wrong; now there is a race to claim credit when some things have started to go right. The International Monetary Fund points to Korea’s recovery -- and more generally to the fact that the sky didn’t fall after all -- as proof that its policy recommendations were right. Never mind that other IMF clients have done far worse, and that the economy of Malaysia- which refused IMF help, and horrified respectable opinion by imposing capital controls -- also seems to be on the mend. Malaysia’s Prime Minister, by contrast, claims full credit for any good news -- even though neighbouring economies also seem to have bottomed out.
The truth is that an observer without any ax to grind would probably conclude that none of the policies adopted either on or in defiance Of the IMF’s advice made much difference either way. Budget policies, interest rate policies, banking reform -- whatever countries tried, just about all the capital that could flee, did. And when there was no more money to run, the natural recuperative powers of the economies finally began to prevail. At best, the money doctors who purported to offer cures provided a helpful bedside manner; at worst, they were like medieval physicians who. prescribed bleeding as a remedy for all ills.
Will the patients stage a full recovery? It depends on exactly what you mean by "full". South Korea’s industrial production is already above its pre-crisis level; but in the spring of 1997 anyone who had predicted zero growth in Korean industry over the next two years would have been regarded as a reckless doomsayer. So if by recovery you mean not just a return to growth, but one that brings the region’s performance back to something like what people used to regard as the Asian norm, they have a long way to go.
"Pundits" in the first paragraph is closest in meaning to
选项
A、economists.
B、bankers.
C、industrialists.
D、financiers.
答案
A
解析
这是道词汇推断题。根据上下文,pundits在文中指经济学家。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gEqO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Oureducationsystemmustrespondinkindandstartteachingchildrenabouttherisksinvolvedinsexbeforetheyevenconsider
Recentresearchhasclaimedthatanexcessofpositiveionsintheaircanhaveanilleffectonpeople’sphysicalorpsychologi
Itishardlynecessaryformetocitealltheevidenceofthedepressingstateofliteracy.ThesefiguresfromtheDepartmentof
AnyrequestintheUnitedKingdomtoremoveadisabledperson’sabilitytoreproduceshouldbetreatedwithgreatcaution.Then
Whenastudyreleasedearlierthisyearlinkedsleepingpillstoanincreaseincanceranddeathrates,morethanafewinsomnia
A、Thesuccessofcuringheartdiseasedependsonanti-smokingcampaigns.B、Fewerpeoplesmoketodayforfearofcancerandheart
OnlyafewhundredpeopleliveinYvoire,butthesmallvillageonthesouthernshoresofLakeGenevahasalottooffer.Iteve
A、ThewomangraduatedfromBrownUniversityinjournalism.B、Thenewpositioninvolvesalotoftravel.C、Computerskillsareno
A、InvestintheNewYorkStockExchange.B、Don’texpectenormousgains.C、Saveatleast11%ofearningayear.D、Remaincalmwh
A、clothes.B、age.C、physique.D、appearance.A当MrsHarrison被要求描述女匪时,她立刻讲到Shewaswearingawoolsweater.这说明受害者对该特征印象最为深刻。
随机试题
腹膜炎形成后的转归是()
下列哪一项是支气管哮喘临床主要表现
“联系舌根.分散于舌下”的经脉是
Gibbs反应的条件是
按照世界贸易组织争端解决制度的规定和实践,有关非违反性申诉与违反性申诉的下列表述正确的是:
计算结构相对指标时,总体各部分数值与总体数值对比求得的比重之和()。
目前教育体制的功能在很大程度上采用“教育抽水机理论”,也就是将高素质的农村劳动者从农村抽吸到城市。将本来可能会有利于农村经济发展的潜在人力资本变成了仅有利于城市经济发展的人力资本。但华西村做法却恰恰相反,它把人才从城市抽吸到华西村发展。有人说,华西村本身就
设则(A*)-1=___________.
数据库系统的三级组织结构中,系统程序员视图是【】。
ThepeopleoftheUSAhavebeenopposedtoacentralizedgovernmentsincelongbeforetheRevolutionof1776.Whenthe13coloni
最新回复
(
0
)