首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Feeding the Masses a Load of Manure The Green Revolution Myth, Norman Borlaug, and World Hunger [A]Most people don’t kno
Feeding the Masses a Load of Manure The Green Revolution Myth, Norman Borlaug, and World Hunger [A]Most people don’t kno
admin
2016-04-30
50
问题
Feeding the Masses a Load of Manure
The Green Revolution Myth, Norman Borlaug, and World Hunger
[A]Most people don’t know Norman Borlaug. He’s the guy who is widely recognized as the father of the "Green Revolution"—the system of farming that combined hybrid seeds with chemical pesticides and fertilizers to grant the world significantly increased crop yields, especially yields of "cereal crops" like wheat, corn, and soybeans.
[B]Mr. Borlaug has been heard recently reproaching "extreme greenies" for promoting organic, sustainable agriculture, saying that such a move either would require the conversion of millions more acres of meadow and forest land into farm land or would mean mass starvation due to what he claims are lower yields from organic farms. With all due respect, we think Stormin’ Norman B. is out in left field playing scarecrow, spouting off about nothing more than the Green Revolution Myth.
Food, World Hunger, and Population Growth
[C]First, there is an obvious question about the logic of Borlaug’s assertion that the increased yield from Green Revolution farming arrived just in time to save hundreds of millions, maybe billions, of earth’s swelling human masses from starvation in the 20th century. One could just as easily frame the issue the other way around: Might it have been the suddenly increased availability of cheap food that itself allowed the global population to rise so quickly? Remember the old saying about "tasks expand to fill the amount of time allowed them"? A version of that may apply here.
[D]Another way to look at the question is whether the Green Revolution has been successful at eliminating hunger. It hasn’t. Since the Green Revolution kicked into high gear in the 1960s, there has been only a modest reduction in the number of people starving or chronically hungry. In 1970, there were an estimated 942 hundred million people in that category; in 2002, the United Nations reported that the number was 842 million. This modest reduction has been almost entirely due to lower levels of hunger among the Chinese population, with the number of hungry people increasing in most other areas of the world.
[E]It is true, of course, that a few billion more people are being fed today compared to half a century ago. But it’s far too simplistic to give the Green Revolution the credit. Two of the main factors that do deserve credit are improvements in seeds via hybridization and major increases in the use of irrigation, including the unsustainable over-pumping of groundwater. These factors plus the chemicals of the Green Revolution combined to put plant growth into overdrive.
The Downside of the Green Revolution
[F]So, if the Green Revolution did help increase total food output, what’s not to like? Plenty. The technologies of the Green Revolution should be looked at as the plant equivalent of steroid use in human athletes. A jock that uses steroids will gain muscle and strength faster and have a competitive advantage. But the big boost is not sustainable over a long period of time, and the negative side effects are well known and often catastrophic to the athlete.
[G]In the case of Green Revolution farming, the chemicals used pollute our land, air, and water; the switch from heavily rotated multiple crops to mono-cropping or dual-cropping reduces total soil fertility and the nutritional value of our food; and the lower number of seed varieties used reduces the genetic diversity found in crops, thus endangering the stability of farm output in the future. The side effects related to soil fertility and genetic diversity will ultimately take their toll. Indeed, yield increases in today’s farm fields have generally leveled off and, in cases such as rice and wheat, yields are beginning to decline in some areas.
[H]Let’s be a little more specific about the problems associated with Green Revolution farming:(1)Farmers, farm workers, and all of us are continually exposed to chemical pesticides due to their widespread use, with each of us carrying a body burden of the toxins.(2)Countless numbers of streams, rivers, and drinking water sources are degraded due to pesticide and fertilizer runoff.(3)Major portions of bays and gulfs are oxygen-starved coastal dead zones due to algal blooms that are fed by fertilizer runoff.(4)Wildlife suffer from genetic mutations due to the farming chemicals that contaminate their ponds and swamps. Notable examples: Genetic mutations in frogs and abnormal genitalia in alligators.(5)State advisories for locally caught fish are chock-full of warnings about fish species contaminated with pesticides.
Would Food Production Drop Without the Green Revolution?
[I]Now to the real point—would we starve if we transitioned back to sustainable agriculture and a-bandoned the chemicals we’ve come to accept as a normal part of farming? No, not at all. Multiple studies, including work by the US National Research Council and a 23-year study by the Rodale Institute, found total food output from "alternative" farms to be equivalent to Green Revolution farms—and sometimes higher.
[J]Cuba provides a real-life, working model to test the conclusions of such research. When the US trade embargo was imposed on Cuba in the late 1980s, the country’s access to Green Revolution "inputs" was suddenly severely restricted. Cuba began to reorient its agriculture back to sustainable approaches based on traditional farming practices and smaller farming operations. Within a decade, the country had solved its food problem, with the added benefit of freeing itself from the cost and toxic pollution associated with imported farming chemicals.
Wrap up... and GMOs
[K]As Lt. Columbo was fond of saying, just one last thing... The big agribusiness companies that brought you the hollow promises of the chemical-based Green Revolution I are now busy cooking up the genetically engineered(GE)Green Revolution II. Again they promise to save the world from hunger, but as before, their real goal is to reap bountiful profits. Not only do some GE technologies, such as "herbicide tolerance", not increase yield and farmer profits, they have been documented to have the opposite effect. In such cases, the only people benefiting are the GE seed and pesticide companies and their shareholders.
[L]There is a place for research and technology in farming, but we should stop trying to conquer nature’s complex, inexorable forces and instead should focus on approaches that work with the power of nature. A lot of research dollars went into developing Green Revolution and GE technologies. If instead we had invested in better sustainable-agriculture methods, we would have increased yields, retained healthier fanning practices, and greatly lessened the huge loss of small and medium-sized farms. In fact, demonstration projects have shown that increases in total food output of up to 100% are possible by using advanced sustainable agriculture techniques. Such approaches also reduce costs and avoid the chemical pollutants and potentially dangerous GE strains that are now upon us.
[M]We won’t be able to simply flip a switch and suddenly convert all the farming acreage on the planet back to smaller, more sustainable farms overnight. But it can be done gradually, without causing mass starvation. Indeed, better health for more people would be the overall result. We in the developed countries of the world should ask our elected representatives to begin a major shift in farm policy to foster such change. We can also directly support the effort by eating organic and/or locally grown food.
[N]The solution to global hunger is to solve problems related to democracy and distribution of income and food in the Third World. We should also ensure that the right to be self-sufficient when it comes to producing one’s food is not trumped by free-trade agreements. The solution to world hunger is not to develop expensive, unneeded technologies that endanger the entire food system. Just say "no"... to G-M-O... and the Green Revolution.
It is suggested that the money wasted on Green Revolution should have been used for better sustainable-agriculture methods.
选项
答案
L
解析
根据better sustainable-agriculture methods定位到L段。该段第2、3句提到,大量研究资金投入到了开发绿色革命和基因技术上,相反,如果我们将资金投入到改善可持续农业的耕作方法中,我们可能已经提高了粮食产量,还保留着更为健康的耕作方式,并大大降低小型和中型农场的巨大损失。本题句子对应了原文的信息。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gJG7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Iknowcold.AndallyouMinnesotapeoplemaydiscountmebecauseIamfromPhoenix,buttrustme,Iknowcold.Ihaveclimbedt
SevenStepstoaMoreFulfillingJobA)Manypeopletodayfindthemselvesinunfulfillingworksituations.Infact,oneinfourw
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteanessayentitledshouldtheSeven-dayMayDayHolidayBeResumed?Youshould
YouDon’tHavetoBe18:GoingtoCollegeasanAdultA)Everysooften,especiallywhenI’mfeelingdown,Itakeoutmyoldcoll
Excitingnewresearchindicatesthatgrowingoldermightnotnecessarilymeangrowingmentallyslower.Newstudiesareproviding
Peopletendtounderestimatetheirlifeexpectancy,andit’snotsurprising.It’sthelook-aroundproblemagain:You【C1】______fr
Badweather,badfood,andgrumpy(脾气暴躁的)people.That’swhatseemstocometomindfirstwhensomepeoplethinkaboutBritain.
A、Itisaffectingourhealthseriously.B、Ithindersourreadingandwriting.C、Itischangingourbodiesaswellasourculture
A、Openstoresinbusyareasofcities.B、Createspeciallanguage.C、Provideacomfortableenvironment.D、Sellavarietyofprodu
A、Toplaytheviolinonceagain.B、TogototheUnitedStates.C、Toapplyforascholarship.D、Tohaveherperformancetaped.D细
随机试题
(2012年04月)宣传作为一种促销工具,具有哪些重要作用?
已产4胎的高产奶牛,分娩后1天突然发生全身肌肉初期震颤,但很快出现全身肌肉松弛无力、四肢瘫痪、四肢位于腹下,头向后弯与胸侧,神智昏迷,各种感觉反射降低或丧失、体温降低,心跳快弱,病急、病程短,不治疗或治疗不当死亡率高。治疗的特效方法()。
患者车祸后2小时送至医院,诉咳嗽,胸部疼痛。查T36.5℃,P130次/分,R30次/分,BP90/60mmHg,神志清晰,右胸部压痛明显,右肺呼吸音低,右下肢有骨折征。胸片示:右侧液气胸。创伤的种类是
风湿病增生期最具特征性的病理变化是()
当评估的重大错报风险为低水平时.注册会计师是否就可以不对重大的交易、账户余额和披露设计和实施实质性程序?
李琳在A公司已经工作了13年,从行政秘书开始,历经行政专员、行政主管、行政部副经理。在几个月前的内部招聘中,李琳竞聘行政部经理,但由于能力欠缺,未能胜出。(1)针对李琳目前处境,人力资源部的职业生涯管理任务是什么?(2)李琳希望下一步能竞聘
如图是一个有n层(n≥2)的六边形点阵。它的中心是一个点,算作第一层,第2层每边有2个点,第3层每边有3个点,……,第n层每边有n个点,则这个点阵的点数共有___________个。
社会工作者陈莲从事房屋拆迁方面的工作,在工作中,她运用了社会策划模式设计社区发展计划。陈莲收集了环境发展趋势资料,了解对计划有影响力的人士和团体,分析他们的利益和需要、他们与计划的关系及对计划的期望和要求,她这样做的目的是()。
童话故事《木偶奇遇记》中,木偶人匹诺曹一撒谎。鼻子就会变长,谎话显而易见。现实生活中,虽然说谎话时我们的鼻子不会变长,但我们身体确实也会产生一些细微的生理变化,有的通过肉眼就可以观察到,有的则要通过精密的测谎仪器才测试出来。日前,美国犹他州大学的科学家研发
有如下程序:intx=3;do{x一=2;cout<<x,}while(!(一x));执行这个程序的输出结果是()。
最新回复
(
0
)