首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
If asked, "What are health decisions?", most of us would answer in terms of hospitals, doctors and pills. Yet we are all making
If asked, "What are health decisions?", most of us would answer in terms of hospitals, doctors and pills. Yet we are all making
admin
2011-01-05
64
问题
If asked, "What are health decisions?", most of us would answer in terms of hospitals, doctors and pills. Yet we are all making a whole range of decisions about our health which go beyond this limited area; for example, whether or not to smoke, exercise, drive a motorbike, or drink alcohol really. The ways we reach decisions and form attitudes about our health are only just beginning to be understood.
The main paradox is why people consistently do things which are known to be very hazardous. Two good examples of this are smoking and not wearing seat belts. Both these examples underline elements of how people reach decisions about their health. Understanding this process is crucial. We can then more effectively change public attitudes to hazardous, voluntary activities like smoking.
Smokers run double the risk of contracting heart disease, several times the risk of suffering from chronic bronchitis and at least 25 times the risk of lung cancer, as compared to non-smokers. Despite extensive press campaigns ( especially in the past 20 years) , which have regularly told smokers and car drivers the grave risks they are running, the number of smokers and seat belt wearers has remained much the same. Although the number of deaths from road accidents and smoking are well publicised, they have aroused little public interest.
If we give smokers the real figures, will it alter their views on the dangers of smoking? Unfortunately not. Many of the "real figures" are in the form of probabilistic estimates, and evidence shows that people are very bad at processing and understanding this kind of information.
The kind of information that tends to be relied on both by the smoker and seat belt non-wearer is anecdotal, based on personal experiences. All smokers seem to have an Uncle Bill or an Auntie Mabel who has been smoking cigarettes since they were twelve, lived to 90, and died because they fell down the stairs. And if they don’t have such an aunt or uncle, they are certain to have heard of someone who has. Similarly, many motorists seem to have heard of people who would have been killed if they had been wearing seat belts.
Reliance on this kind of evidence and not being able to cope with "probabilistic" data form the two main foundation stones of people’s assessment of risk. A third is reliance on press-publicised dangers and causes of death. American psychologists have shown that people overestimate the frequency (and therefore the danger) of the dramatic causes of death (like aeroplane crashes)and underestimate the undramatic, unpublicised killers (like smoking) which actually take a greater toll of life.
What is needed is some way of changing people’s evaluations of and attitudes to the risks of certain activities like smoking. What can be done? The "national" approach of giving people the "facts and figures" seems ineffective. But the evidence shows that when people are frightened, they are more likely to change their estimates of the dangers involved in smoking or not wearing seat belts. Press and television can do this very cost-effectively. Programmes like Dying for a Fag (a Thames TV programme) vividly showed the health hazards of smoking and may have increased the chances of people stopping smoking permanently.
So a mass-media approach may work. But it needs to be carefully controlled. Overall, the new awareness of the problem of health decisions and behaviour is at least a more hopeful sign for the future.
For answers 51-55, mark
Y (for YES) if the statement agrees with the information given in the passage;
N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage;
NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage.
That people are constantly doing things that are known to be dangerous to their health is a main ______.
选项
答案
paradox
解析
参见第二段第一句。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gK8K777K
本试题收录于:
A类竞赛(研究生)题库大学生英语竞赛(NECCS)分类
0
A类竞赛(研究生)
大学生英语竞赛(NECCS)
相关试题推荐
Severalguestswerewaitinginthe______forthefrontdoortoopen.
NEWYORKMay26,(Reuters)—AttorneyDennisKeniganjustspentaweekrisingatdaybreaktoanswere-mailsandfieldconferencec
Thegovernmentismakingeveryeffortto______aneconomiccrisis,butitseemsnothingcouldhelp.
WriteareportonwintersportsinChinainabout120wordsontheanswersheet.WARMINGUPParticipationinjunioricehockeyl
YouareinEnglandhelpingtoorganiseacourseforforeignstudentswhichbeginsnextweek.Thismorningyoureceivedamessage
Doctorsoftentellpatientstotakeacertainkindofmedicineinorderto【D1】______anillness.Forexample,apatientmaynee
Doctorsoftentellpatientstotakeacertainkindofmedicineinorderto【D1】______anillness.Forexample,apatientmaynee
Ittakesjustacoupleoflittletwiststoturnthesematchsticksintoamessage.Canyoufindtheword?
Thereportersexposedthecorruptionofseveralhighofficialsinthegovernment;_________,theywereaskedtoresignfromoffic
随机试题
排便后可出现便血的疾病是
张女士,45岁。慢性咳嗽、咳大量脓痰、咯.10年,加重半个月。护理体检:血压120/70mmHg,心率96次/分,左肺底闻及湿啰音,见杵状指。胸片显示:左肺下纹理粗乱,呈卷发状,诊断为支气管扩张症。下列哪项护理措施是不正确的()。
根据《注册建造师施工管理签章文件目录》的规定,机电工程的施工组织管理文件包括()。
某社会工作服务机构进行自我评估时发现,机构有关女员工产假等方面的制度不健全,遂根据相关法律法规对员工的产假、哺乳期、带薪年假和体检等制度进行了修订和完善。这一工作满足了()需要。
下列是孙中山在革命进程中的言论,其先后顺序是()①自今日始,吾等之非清朝人矣②驱除鞑虏,恢复中华,创立合众政府③使全国人民赞成我的政策,我十年之内必能为中国造二十万里铁道④顾吾国之大患,莫大于武人之争雄,南与北如一丘之貉
简述影响支付方式的主要因素。
Inrecentyearsmanycountriesoftheworldhavebeenfacedwiththeproblemofhowtomaketheirworkersmoreproductive.Some
在考生文件夹下,完成如下综合应用:建立如图所示表单,表单完成一个计算器的功能。表单文件名和表单控件名均为calculator,表单标题为"计算器"。表单运行时,分别在操作数1(Label1)和操作数2(Label2)下的文本框(分别为Text1和Tex
将考生文件夹下SEP\DES文件夹中的文件ABC.BMP复制到考生文件夹下SPEAK文件夹中。
Thetownisfamousforitsmagnificentchurchtowers.
最新回复
(
0
)