首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
If asked, "What are health decisions?", most of us would answer in terms of hospitals, doctors and pills. Yet we are all making
If asked, "What are health decisions?", most of us would answer in terms of hospitals, doctors and pills. Yet we are all making
admin
2011-01-05
96
问题
If asked, "What are health decisions?", most of us would answer in terms of hospitals, doctors and pills. Yet we are all making a whole range of decisions about our health which go beyond this limited area; for example, whether or not to smoke, exercise, drive a motorbike, or drink alcohol really. The ways we reach decisions and form attitudes about our health are only just beginning to be understood.
The main paradox is why people consistently do things which are known to be very hazardous. Two good examples of this are smoking and not wearing seat belts. Both these examples underline elements of how people reach decisions about their health. Understanding this process is crucial. We can then more effectively change public attitudes to hazardous, voluntary activities like smoking.
Smokers run double the risk of contracting heart disease, several times the risk of suffering from chronic bronchitis and at least 25 times the risk of lung cancer, as compared to non-smokers. Despite extensive press campaigns ( especially in the past 20 years) , which have regularly told smokers and car drivers the grave risks they are running, the number of smokers and seat belt wearers has remained much the same. Although the number of deaths from road accidents and smoking are well publicised, they have aroused little public interest.
If we give smokers the real figures, will it alter their views on the dangers of smoking? Unfortunately not. Many of the "real figures" are in the form of probabilistic estimates, and evidence shows that people are very bad at processing and understanding this kind of information.
The kind of information that tends to be relied on both by the smoker and seat belt non-wearer is anecdotal, based on personal experiences. All smokers seem to have an Uncle Bill or an Auntie Mabel who has been smoking cigarettes since they were twelve, lived to 90, and died because they fell down the stairs. And if they don’t have such an aunt or uncle, they are certain to have heard of someone who has. Similarly, many motorists seem to have heard of people who would have been killed if they had been wearing seat belts.
Reliance on this kind of evidence and not being able to cope with "probabilistic" data form the two main foundation stones of people’s assessment of risk. A third is reliance on press-publicised dangers and causes of death. American psychologists have shown that people overestimate the frequency (and therefore the danger) of the dramatic causes of death (like aeroplane crashes)and underestimate the undramatic, unpublicised killers (like smoking) which actually take a greater toll of life.
What is needed is some way of changing people’s evaluations of and attitudes to the risks of certain activities like smoking. What can be done? The "national" approach of giving people the "facts and figures" seems ineffective. But the evidence shows that when people are frightened, they are more likely to change their estimates of the dangers involved in smoking or not wearing seat belts. Press and television can do this very cost-effectively. Programmes like Dying for a Fag (a Thames TV programme) vividly showed the health hazards of smoking and may have increased the chances of people stopping smoking permanently.
So a mass-media approach may work. But it needs to be carefully controlled. Overall, the new awareness of the problem of health decisions and behaviour is at least a more hopeful sign for the future.
For answers 51-55, mark
Y (for YES) if the statement agrees with the information given in the passage;
N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage;
NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage.
That people are constantly doing things that are known to be dangerous to their health is a main ______.
选项
答案
paradox
解析
参见第二段第一句。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gK8K777K
本试题收录于:
A类竞赛(研究生)题库大学生英语竞赛(NECCS)分类
0
A类竞赛(研究生)
大学生英语竞赛(NECCS)
相关试题推荐
Severalguestswerewaitinginthe______forthefrontdoortoopen.
Thegovernmentismakingeveryeffortto______aneconomiccrisis,butitseemsnothingcouldhelp.
Writeanairpollutionreportinaround120wordsandwriteitontheanswersheet.
Readthechartbelowandwritea120-wordreportonpopulationgrowthasthechartdescribes.Writeontheanswersheet.
YouareinEnglandhelpingtoorganiseacourseforforeignstudentswhichbeginsnextweek.Thismorningyoureceivedamessage
Doctorsoftentellpatientstotakeacertainkindofmedicineinorderto【D1】______anillness.Forexample,apatientmaynee
Doctorsoftentellpatientstotakeacertainkindofmedicineinorderto【D1】______anillness.Forexample,apatientmaynee
Doctorsoftentellpatientstotakeacertainkindofmedicineinorderto【D1】______anillness.Forexample,apatientmaynee
SeveralresearchgroupsintheUnitedStatesareconductinggeneticresearchaimedatretardingaging.Ifthebreakthroughsofr
随机试题
下列哪一项不是促胰液素的作用
肝性脑病的分期正确的是
关于妇女保健的法规包括下列哪些法规
女性,26岁,因宫外孕出血导致失血性休克,经抢救后,测中心静脉压为16cmH2O,血压为90/70mmHg,此时应考虑应用
选择卡片号为1502的固定资产变动单,生成记账凭证。
昨天我急急忙忙赶到火车站,发现火车已经开走了。
人类正面临着全球变暖的挑战,联合国的一份报告为我们()了气候变化将会产生的灾难性后果。
所谓传统型权威指的是政治权力的正当性是基于一种历史悠久的习俗与传统而来的,在这种统治形式里,统治的维持是靠从古到今沿袭下来的风俗习惯和伦理道德。法理型权威即以法律和理性为依据而进行统治的形式。由于该种权威不是依赖于个人,而是来自法律,因而就必须有健全的法律
据新华社2022年5月20日报道。国办目前印发《“十四五”国民健康规划》。《规划》提出,到2025年。我国人均预期寿命在2020年基础上继续提高()左右。
Thefollowingquestionspresentasentence,partofwhichorallofwhichisunderlined.Beneaththesentence,youwillfindfiv
最新回复
(
0
)