首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
If asked, "What are health decisions?", most of us would answer in terms of hospitals, doctors and pills. Yet we are all making
If asked, "What are health decisions?", most of us would answer in terms of hospitals, doctors and pills. Yet we are all making
admin
2011-01-05
60
问题
If asked, "What are health decisions?", most of us would answer in terms of hospitals, doctors and pills. Yet we are all making a whole range of decisions about our health which go beyond this limited area; for example, whether or not to smoke, exercise, drive a motorbike, or drink alcohol really. The ways we reach decisions and form attitudes about our health are only just beginning to be understood.
The main paradox is why people consistently do things which are known to be very hazardous. Two good examples of this are smoking and not wearing seat belts. Both these examples underline elements of how people reach decisions about their health. Understanding this process is crucial. We can then more effectively change public attitudes to hazardous, voluntary activities like smoking.
Smokers run double the risk of contracting heart disease, several times the risk of suffering from chronic bronchitis and at least 25 times the risk of lung cancer, as compared to non-smokers. Despite extensive press campaigns ( especially in the past 20 years) , which have regularly told smokers and car drivers the grave risks they are running, the number of smokers and seat belt wearers has remained much the same. Although the number of deaths from road accidents and smoking are well publicised, they have aroused little public interest.
If we give smokers the real figures, will it alter their views on the dangers of smoking? Unfortunately not. Many of the "real figures" are in the form of probabilistic estimates, and evidence shows that people are very bad at processing and understanding this kind of information.
The kind of information that tends to be relied on both by the smoker and seat belt non-wearer is anecdotal, based on personal experiences. All smokers seem to have an Uncle Bill or an Auntie Mabel who has been smoking cigarettes since they were twelve, lived to 90, and died because they fell down the stairs. And if they don’t have such an aunt or uncle, they are certain to have heard of someone who has. Similarly, many motorists seem to have heard of people who would have been killed if they had been wearing seat belts.
Reliance on this kind of evidence and not being able to cope with "probabilistic" data form the two main foundation stones of people’s assessment of risk. A third is reliance on press-publicised dangers and causes of death. American psychologists have shown that people overestimate the frequency (and therefore the danger) of the dramatic causes of death (like aeroplane crashes)and underestimate the undramatic, unpublicised killers (like smoking) which actually take a greater toll of life.
What is needed is some way of changing people’s evaluations of and attitudes to the risks of certain activities like smoking. What can be done? The "national" approach of giving people the "facts and figures" seems ineffective. But the evidence shows that when people are frightened, they are more likely to change their estimates of the dangers involved in smoking or not wearing seat belts. Press and television can do this very cost-effectively. Programmes like Dying for a Fag (a Thames TV programme) vividly showed the health hazards of smoking and may have increased the chances of people stopping smoking permanently.
So a mass-media approach may work. But it needs to be carefully controlled. Overall, the new awareness of the problem of health decisions and behaviour is at least a more hopeful sign for the future.
For answers 51-55, mark
Y (for YES) if the statement agrees with the information given in the passage;
N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage;
NG (for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage.
That people are constantly doing things that are known to be dangerous to their health is a main ______.
选项
答案
paradox
解析
参见第二段第一句。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gK8K777K
本试题收录于:
A类竞赛(研究生)题库大学生英语竞赛(NECCS)分类
0
A类竞赛(研究生)
大学生英语竞赛(NECCS)
相关试题推荐
NEWYORKMay26,(Reuters)—AttorneyDennisKeniganjustspentaweekrisingatdaybreaktoanswere-mailsandfieldconferencec
Readthechartbelowandwritea120-wordreportonpopulationgrowthasthechartdescribes.Writeontheanswersheet.
Doctorsoftentellpatientstotakeacertainkindofmedicineinorderto【D1】______anillness.Forexample,apatientmaynee
Doctorsoftentellpatientstotakeacertainkindofmedicineinorderto【D1】______anillness.Forexample,apatientmaynee
Doctorsoftentellpatientstotakeacertainkindofmedicineinorderto【D1】______anillness.Forexample,apatientmaynee
SeveralresearchgroupsintheUnitedStatesareconductinggeneticresearchaimedatretardingaging.Ifthebreakthroughsofr
Thereportersexposedthecorruptionofseveralhighofficialsinthegovernment;_________,theywereaskedtoresignfromoffic
随机试题
艺术品赖以在时空中存在的塞体和媒介是指
中国共产党的中央组织:_________;_________;_________;_________;_________;_________。
某类风湿关节炎患者外伤后伤口不愈合,PT,APTT,血浆因子Ⅷ、Ⅸ、Ⅺ和Ⅻ的促凝活性测定均正常,血常规正常,若怀疑并发获得性Ⅻ因子缺乏,首选试验是
关于子宫肌瘤病因方面,下列不正确的说法是:
桑杏汤的功效是
如果沉淀反应体系中抗原抗体处于最适比例(即等价带),那么
A、宜食高蛋白食物B、不宜多食脂肪C、不宜吃鱼D、宜少食高蛋白食物E、可适当多食脂肪性食物口服灰黄霉素时
【2010年第4题】题11~15:一座110/10kV有人值班的重要变电所,装有容量为20MVA的主变压器两台,采用220V铅酸蓄电池作为直流电源,所有断路器配电磁操作机构,最大一台断路器合闸电流为98A。请回答以下问题,并列出解答过程。该变电所的断路
某建材家居商城2006年实际占用的土地面积为20000平方米,属于商城的停车场占地500平方米,拥有房产原值2800万元,该房产评估值为4000万元。2006年1月,为扩大经营规模,经批准增加土地2500平方米,扩建商城投资额预计280万元,于当年9月30
秦汉时期实行重农抑商政策,其中汉高祖采取了()一系列政策。①商人不得为官②商人禁止拥有私田③实行“贵粟政策”④重视农桑
最新回复
(
0
)