首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
admin
2019-09-17
47
问题
Municipal
bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeeper and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants, "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism." If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U.S., warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, and May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings ("Smokers die earlier") or esteem-related warnings ("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid warning on a cigarette label may actually
backfire
.
Scribbler50, for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left.
It can be inferred from the passage that the ban incurs great______in "Scribbler50".
选项
A、terror
B、anger
C、unrest
D、hostility
答案
B
解析
语义推理。第二段“The barkeeper and blogger…was outraged…”就点明了事情的状态,博主拍案而起(outraged)。大家认为这种方式太粗暴,有点法西斯的做派,显然表达了强烈的愤怒。【知识拓展】首先outraged和angry是近义词,基本可以确定“Scribbler50”内成员的态度。然后看博客内的言论即可印证这个结论。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gMwO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Upuntilnow,IbelievethemostvaluableseminarIhaveattendedwasheldbytheChinaCenterforEconomicResearch(CCER),Peki
IsEarthGettingWarmer?TheNationalAcademyofSciencesclaimedrecentlythatpeopleshouldcautionratherthanpanicaboutth
IsEarthGettingWarmer?TheNationalAcademyofSciencesclaimedrecentlythatpeopleshouldcautionratherthanpanicaboutth
UpperPaleolithicartwasnotconfinedtocavepaintings.Manyshaftsofspearsandsimilarobjectsweredecoratedwithfigures
Reductioninnumbersofgameshouldhavebodedillfortheirsurvivalinlatertimes.Aworseningoftheplightofdeerwastob
Threeotherexplanationsseemmorepromising.Oneinvolvesphysiologicalchangesrelevanttomemory.Maturationofthefrontall
Ifyouwereaskedtochooseonemoviethathasinfluencedyourthinking,whichonewouldyouchoose?Why?Whatwasespeciallyim
SurfaceFluidsonVenusandEarthP1:WhenastronomersfirstpointedtheirrudimentarytelescopesatVenus,theysawaworldshr
DinosaursandParentalCareP1:"Parentalcare"referstothelevelofinvestmentprovidedbyamotherandfathertoinsurethe
DinosaursandParentalCareP1:"Parentalcare"referstothelevelofinvestmentprovidedbyamotherandfathertoinsurethe
随机试题
男孩,7岁,左膝痛、高热1周。查体:T39.8℃,左胫骨上端深压痛,X线片未见异常。局部穿刺抽出脓血样物。此时应首选的治疗是
甲亢的发病与下列哪些因素有关
患者,男,60岁。大便后突起右手无力,讲话不清,约1h后昏迷。体检:浅昏迷,瞳孔等大,血压29.3/14.6kPa,右侧肢体瘫痪,肌张力低,腱反射未引出,右侧巴氏征阳性。最可能的诊断是
生态现状调查的一级评价应给出采样地样方实测、遥感等方法测定的()等数据,给出主要生物物种名录、受保护的野生动植物物种等调查资料。
重要建筑的屋面防水设防道数通常为()。
发行人公开发行证券上市当年即亏损,证监会对其保荐机构和保荐代表人应进行的处罚是()。
某股份有限公司注册资本为3000万元,公司现有法定公积金1000万元,任意公积金500万元,现该公司拟以公积金500万元增资派股。下列方案中,符合公司法律制度规定的有()。
对职工个人取得的量化资产以下说法正确的是()。
每当文明发展到了相当的程度,人便可以看到他自己的错误和他的同人的错误,于是便出现了_________。每当人的智力能够察觉统治人们的愚行,政客们的伪善面孔与_________,以及人类的弱点与缺失,徒劳无益的努力与矫揉造作的情态,我们自己的梦想与现实之脱节
简述单侧检验和双侧检验的区别。
最新回复
(
0
)