首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same.
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same.
admin
2021-06-06
84
问题
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same. That is, we marry the wrong person. So here is the question, why will we marry the wrong person?
For most of recorded history, people married for logical sorts of reasons: because her parcel of land adjoined yours, his family had a flourishing business, her father was the magistrate in town, there was a castle to keep up, or both sets of parents subscribed to the same interpretation of a holy text. And from such reasonable marriages, there flowed loneliness, infidelity, abuse, hardness of heart and screams heard through the nursery doors. The marriage of reason was not, in hindsight, reasonable at all; it was often expedient, narrow-minded, snobbish and exploitative. That is why what has replaced it—the marriage of feeling—has largely been spared the need to account for itself.
What matters in the marriage of feeling is that two people are drawn to each other by an overwhelming instinct and know in their hearts that it is right. Indeed, the more imprudent a marriage appears (perhaps it’s been only six months since they met; one of them has no job or both are barely out of their teens), the safer it can feel.
But though we believe ourselves to be seeking happiness in marriage, it isn’t that simple. What we really seek is familiarity—which may well complicate any plans we might have had for happiness. We are looking to recreate, within our adult relationships, the feelings we knew so well in childhood. The love most of us will have tasted early on was often confused with other more destructive dynamics: feelings of wanting to help an adult who was out of control, of being deprived of a parent’s warmth or scared of his anger, of not feeling secure enough to communicate our wishes. How logical, then, that we should as grown-ups find ourselves rejecting certain candidates for marriage not because they are wrong but because they are too right—too balanced, mature, understanding and reliable—given that in our hearts, such Tightness feels foreign. We marry the wrong people because we don’t associate being loved with feeling of happiness.
Finally, we marry to make a nice feeling permanent. We imagine that marriage will help us to bottle the joy we felt when the thought of proposing first came to us: Perhaps we were in Venice, on the lagoon, in a motorboat, with the evening sun throwing glitter across the sea, chatting about aspects of our souls no one ever seemed to have grasped before, with the prospect of dinner in a risotto place a little later. We married to make such sensations permanent but failed to see that there was no solid connection between these feelings and the institution of marriage.
The good news is that it doesn’t matter if we find we have married the wrong person. We mustn’t abandon him or her, only the founding romantic idea upon which the Western understanding of marriage has been based the last 250 years: that a perfect being exists who can meet all our needs and satisfy our every yearning. We need to swap the romantic view for a tragic (and at points comedic) awareness that every human will frustrate, anger, annoy, madden and disappoint us—and we will (without any malice)
do the same to them
.
The person who is best suited to us is not the person who shares our every taste (he or she doesn’t exist), but the person who can negotiate differences in taste intelligently—the person who is good at disagreement. Rather than some notional idea of perfect complementarity, it is the capacity to tolerate differences with generosity that is the true marker of the "not overly wrong" person. Compatibility is an achievement of love; it must not be its precondition.
Which of the following is typical of the marriage of feeling?
选项
A、Being unable to support oneself.
B、Having a sensible compassion.
C、Being attracted to each other.
D、Seeking a perfect match.
答案
C
解析
细节题。A项“不能自力更生”,B项“有一种理智的同情”,C项“被互相吸引”,D项“追求般配”。根据第三段中的“What matters in the marriage of feeling is that two people are drawn to each other by an overwhelming instinct and know in their hearts that it is right”可知,在建立于感情基础上的婚姻中,重要的是双方被一种无法抗拒的直觉相互吸引。故本题选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gZjD777K
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
按照传统规模分类,旅游饭店可以分为大、中、小型三类。其中,中型饭店要求客房期在()。
我国三大旅行社中国旅行社、中国国际旅行社、中国青年旅行社成立的时间分别是()。
导游语言要做到准确性,导游人员必须注意()。
Whichofthefollowingdescribesthefunctionofthesentence"Itisaniceday,isn’tit?"?
Whichofthefollowingwordshasadifferentstresspattern?
It’soneofthethingswearemostafraidmighthappentous.Wegotogreatlengthstoavoidit.Andyetwedoitallthesame.
Waitrosehasunveileditsvisionofenvironmentallyconsciousshopping,offeringcustomersthechancetobuyfoodanddrinkthat
Whichofthefollowingactivitiesbestpromotesthedevelopmentofstudents’communicativeskills?
TelevisionhastransformedpoliticsintheUnitedStatesbychangingthewayinwhichinformationisdisseminated,byalteringp
Childrenwhospendmorethantwohoursadayatacomputerorwatchingtelevisionaremorelikelythanotherstohavementalpro
随机试题
5岁小儿,因高热,咽部和扁桃体充血肿胀,表面有点状黄白色渗出物来院就诊,以猩红热收入院。目前该患儿体温达39℃,全身出疹。皮疹首发于耳后,之后遍及全身。为在弥漫性充血的皮肤上出现分布均匀的针尖大小的丘疹,疹尖无正常皮肤。针对皮肤的正确护理措施是
香橼的功效佛手的功效
甲状腺功能减退症最具特征的临床表现是
有一部分浸水的砂土坡,如图6—2所示,坡率为1:1.5,坡高4m,水位在2m处;水上、水下的砂土的内摩擦角均为φ=38°;水上砂土重度γ=18kN/m3,水下砂土饱和重度γsat=20kN/m3。用传递系数法计算沿图示的折线滑动面滑动的安全系数最接近于下列
我国《行政诉讼法》规定,对行政案件实行()。
最早的教学过程思想即学、思、行统一的观点,其提出者是()
如果2009年2月1日是星期天,那么2009年3月5日是星期几?()
生态整体主义超越了以人类利益为根本尺度的人类中心主义,颠覆了长期以来被人类普遍认同的一些基本的价值观。它要求人们不再仅仅从人的角度认识世界,关注和谋求人类自身的利益,要求人们为了生态整体的利益而不只是人类自身的利益自觉主动地限制超越生态系统承载能力的物质欲
福禄贝尔建立了一个以活动与游戏为主要特征的幼儿园课程体系,其依据不包括
Conventionally,acomputerconsistsofatleastoneprocessingelement,typicallya()andsomeformofmemory.
最新回复
(
0
)