首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same.
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same.
admin
2021-06-06
36
问题
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same. That is, we marry the wrong person. So here is the question, why will we marry the wrong person?
For most of recorded history, people married for logical sorts of reasons: because her parcel of land adjoined yours, his family had a flourishing business, her father was the magistrate in town, there was a castle to keep up, or both sets of parents subscribed to the same interpretation of a holy text. And from such reasonable marriages, there flowed loneliness, infidelity, abuse, hardness of heart and screams heard through the nursery doors. The marriage of reason was not, in hindsight, reasonable at all; it was often expedient, narrow-minded, snobbish and exploitative. That is why what has replaced it—the marriage of feeling—has largely been spared the need to account for itself.
What matters in the marriage of feeling is that two people are drawn to each other by an overwhelming instinct and know in their hearts that it is right. Indeed, the more imprudent a marriage appears (perhaps it’s been only six months since they met; one of them has no job or both are barely out of their teens), the safer it can feel.
But though we believe ourselves to be seeking happiness in marriage, it isn’t that simple. What we really seek is familiarity—which may well complicate any plans we might have had for happiness. We are looking to recreate, within our adult relationships, the feelings we knew so well in childhood. The love most of us will have tasted early on was often confused with other more destructive dynamics: feelings of wanting to help an adult who was out of control, of being deprived of a parent’s warmth or scared of his anger, of not feeling secure enough to communicate our wishes. How logical, then, that we should as grown-ups find ourselves rejecting certain candidates for marriage not because they are wrong but because they are too right—too balanced, mature, understanding and reliable—given that in our hearts, such Tightness feels foreign. We marry the wrong people because we don’t associate being loved with feeling of happiness.
Finally, we marry to make a nice feeling permanent. We imagine that marriage will help us to bottle the joy we felt when the thought of proposing first came to us: Perhaps we were in Venice, on the lagoon, in a motorboat, with the evening sun throwing glitter across the sea, chatting about aspects of our souls no one ever seemed to have grasped before, with the prospect of dinner in a risotto place a little later. We married to make such sensations permanent but failed to see that there was no solid connection between these feelings and the institution of marriage.
The good news is that it doesn’t matter if we find we have married the wrong person. We mustn’t abandon him or her, only the founding romantic idea upon which the Western understanding of marriage has been based the last 250 years: that a perfect being exists who can meet all our needs and satisfy our every yearning. We need to swap the romantic view for a tragic (and at points comedic) awareness that every human will frustrate, anger, annoy, madden and disappoint us—and we will (without any malice)
do the same to them
.
The person who is best suited to us is not the person who shares our every taste (he or she doesn’t exist), but the person who can negotiate differences in taste intelligently—the person who is good at disagreement. Rather than some notional idea of perfect complementarity, it is the capacity to tolerate differences with generosity that is the true marker of the "not overly wrong" person. Compatibility is an achievement of love; it must not be its precondition.
Which of the following is the key to a happy marriage according to the passage?
选项
A、Commonalities in every taste.
B、Mutual attraction at first sight.
C、Generosity in fixing differences.
D、Complementarity in most aspects.
答案
C
解析
细节题。A项“拥有共同的喜好”,B项“一见钟情”,C项“大度地解决分歧”,D项“在很多方面互补”。根据最后一段可知,真正适合自己的人不是和我们喜好都相同的人,而是能够大度地容忍差异的人。A项错误,C项正确。找到这样一个合适的人是一段幸福婚姻的关键。互补是爱情的成果,而非前提。D项错误。B项原文未提及。故本题选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wZjD777K
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
在带团工作前,导游领队人员应熟悉团队成员、旅游产品、旅游目的地的基本情况,为恰当引导旅游者做好准备,这是()的要求。
当地震发生时,如果游客身处室内,下面选项操作正确的是()。
接待计划是组团旅行社委托有关地方接待旅行社组织落实旅游团活动的()文件。
Whichofthefollowingpairsofwordsaresynonyms?
It’soneofthethingswearemostafraidmighthappentous.Wegotogreatlengthstoavoidit.Andyetwedoitallthesame.
It’soneofthethingswearemostafraidmighthappentous.Wegotogreatlengthstoavoidit.Andyetwedoitallthesame.
WhichofthefollowingshowstheproperpronunciationoftheEnglishconsonantgroup"spl"intheword"splash"?
What’shappening:Withglobalpopulationlevelssettoreachcloseto10billionpeopleby2050,theecologicalimpactofth
It’soneofourcommonbeliefsthatmiceareafraidofcats.Scientistshavelongknownthatevenifamousehasneverseenaca
Childrenwhospendmorethantwohoursadayatacomputerorwatchingtelevisionaremorelikelythanotherstohavementalpro
随机试题
吸入性麻醉前为了减少呼吸道分泌物,给患者使用的药物是
脑瘫患儿肢体屈肌张力高时,根据Bobath方法可采用
下列关于城市变电所的设计说法有误的是()。
进口实施食品卫生检验的货物,应向食品卫生检验所报验;出口同类货物的检验不由下列哪几个机构实施。()
下列情形中,根据会计准则规定应当重述比较期间财务报表的有()。(2015年)
消费者在购买商品或接受服务时,有权获得的交易公平条件包括()
党的十九大报告提出,新时代中国特色社会主义思想是全党全国人民为实现中华民族伟大复兴而奋斗的行动指南。()
一个房间里有9个人,平均年龄是25岁;另一个房间里有11个人,平均年龄是45岁,两个房间的人合在一起,他们的平均年龄是多少岁?()
A.条件(1)充分,但条件(2)不充分B.条件(2)充分,但条件(1)不充分C.条件(1)和条件(2)单独都不充分,但条件(1)和条件(2)联合起来充分D.条件(1)充分,条件(2)也充分E.条件(1)和条件(2)单独都不充分,条件(1)和条件(2
ThereisgrowinginterestinEastJapanRailwayCo.ltd.,oneofthesixcompanies,createdoutoftheprivatizednationalrailw
最新回复
(
0
)