首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same.
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same.
admin
2021-06-06
93
问题
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same. That is, we marry the wrong person. So here is the question, why will we marry the wrong person?
For most of recorded history, people married for logical sorts of reasons: because her parcel of land adjoined yours, his family had a flourishing business, her father was the magistrate in town, there was a castle to keep up, or both sets of parents subscribed to the same interpretation of a holy text. And from such reasonable marriages, there flowed loneliness, infidelity, abuse, hardness of heart and screams heard through the nursery doors. The marriage of reason was not, in hindsight, reasonable at all; it was often expedient, narrow-minded, snobbish and exploitative. That is why what has replaced it—the marriage of feeling—has largely been spared the need to account for itself.
What matters in the marriage of feeling is that two people are drawn to each other by an overwhelming instinct and know in their hearts that it is right. Indeed, the more imprudent a marriage appears (perhaps it’s been only six months since they met; one of them has no job or both are barely out of their teens), the safer it can feel.
But though we believe ourselves to be seeking happiness in marriage, it isn’t that simple. What we really seek is familiarity—which may well complicate any plans we might have had for happiness. We are looking to recreate, within our adult relationships, the feelings we knew so well in childhood. The love most of us will have tasted early on was often confused with other more destructive dynamics: feelings of wanting to help an adult who was out of control, of being deprived of a parent’s warmth or scared of his anger, of not feeling secure enough to communicate our wishes. How logical, then, that we should as grown-ups find ourselves rejecting certain candidates for marriage not because they are wrong but because they are too right—too balanced, mature, understanding and reliable—given that in our hearts, such Tightness feels foreign. We marry the wrong people because we don’t associate being loved with feeling of happiness.
Finally, we marry to make a nice feeling permanent. We imagine that marriage will help us to bottle the joy we felt when the thought of proposing first came to us: Perhaps we were in Venice, on the lagoon, in a motorboat, with the evening sun throwing glitter across the sea, chatting about aspects of our souls no one ever seemed to have grasped before, with the prospect of dinner in a risotto place a little later. We married to make such sensations permanent but failed to see that there was no solid connection between these feelings and the institution of marriage.
The good news is that it doesn’t matter if we find we have married the wrong person. We mustn’t abandon him or her, only the founding romantic idea upon which the Western understanding of marriage has been based the last 250 years: that a perfect being exists who can meet all our needs and satisfy our every yearning. We need to swap the romantic view for a tragic (and at points comedic) awareness that every human will frustrate, anger, annoy, madden and disappoint us—and we will (without any malice)
do the same to them
.
The person who is best suited to us is not the person who shares our every taste (he or she doesn’t exist), but the person who can negotiate differences in taste intelligently—the person who is good at disagreement. Rather than some notional idea of perfect complementarity, it is the capacity to tolerate differences with generosity that is the true marker of the "not overly wrong" person. Compatibility is an achievement of love; it must not be its precondition.
Which of the following is the key to a happy marriage according to the passage?
选项
A、Commonalities in every taste.
B、Mutual attraction at first sight.
C、Generosity in fixing differences.
D、Complementarity in most aspects.
答案
C
解析
细节题。A项“拥有共同的喜好”,B项“一见钟情”,C项“大度地解决分歧”,D项“在很多方面互补”。根据最后一段可知,真正适合自己的人不是和我们喜好都相同的人,而是能够大度地容忍差异的人。A项错误,C项正确。找到这样一个合适的人是一段幸福婚姻的关键。互补是爱情的成果,而非前提。D项错误。B项原文未提及。故本题选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wZjD777K
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
旅游团的参观活动一般由旅行社的()事先联络,并安排和落实好主人的接待。
在接待宗教型团队的过程中,下列做法不符合导游服务要求的是()。
游客往往通过导游带领其进行旅游活动的情况来判断旅游产品的()。
全陪在接受旅游团的接待任务后,首先要(),以便提供针对性的服务。
接待计划是组团旅行社委托有关地方接待旅行社组织落实旅游团活动的()文件。
Whichofthefollowingactivitieshasafocusongramma
WhichofthefollowingactivitiesisNOTappropriatefordevelopingstudents’awarenessofdiscoursecoherence?
WhichofthefollowingshowstheproperpronunciationoftheEnglishconsonantgroup"spl"intheword"splash"?
It’soneofourcommonbeliefsthatmiceareafraidofcats.Scientistshavelongknownthatevenifamousehasneverseenaca
Childrenwhospendmorethantwohoursadayatacomputerorwatchingtelevisionaremorelikelythanotherstohavementalpro
随机试题
理论示功图的假设条件有:抽油设备在抽油过程中,受到砂、蜡、气、水的影响;进入泵内的液体是不可压缩的;阀的开、关是瞬间的。()
不属于排除硬脂酸镁对片剂分析方法干扰的是
Ⅱ度牙槽骨吸收指()
预借提单和倒签提单
钢丰公司独家研发了某合金钢材生产工艺,填补国内空白。参与该项目研发的林某私自将该工艺卖给瑞凯公司,造成钢丰公司市场份额损失。为弥补损失,钢丰公司向市中级人民法院起诉林某、瑞凯公司,诉请两被告连带赔偿损失30万元。关于本案,下列哪些说法是正确的?(
采购人全部或部分使用财政性资金进行采购的,属于政府采购的管理范围。其中财政性资金包括()。
中央银行的特征主要表现为()。
执行ARM指令STRR0,[R1,#4]!之后,以下说法正确的是()。
Accordingtothepassage,whatkindofenvironmentalproblemwillsandstormsbringabout?Whatisthepossiblemeaningof"visi
Whathesaidatthemeetingthismorning(没有把年轻人的具体需要考虑进去)___________.
最新回复
(
0
)