首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whose Grave is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for t
Whose Grave is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for t
admin
2013-08-12
40
问题
Whose Grave is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A)
hen Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.(B)
he tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.(C)
Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.(D)
There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable?
From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance.
Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself.
Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come(while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves).
The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up.
In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us.
Look at the four squares
that indicate where the following sentence could be added to the passage.
Howard Carter and his assistant unwrapped the innermost of Tutankhamen’s three nested coffins. The third coffin is solid gold and contained the king’s mummified body.
Where would the sentence best fit?
选项
答案
B
解析
本题是插话题,考查考生能否将一句话按其逻辑关系正确地插入顺序相连的四个句子之间。根据上下文,所插入的话语含有关于挖掘墓葬等信息,第一句描述Carter一帮人打开Egyptian king Tutankhamen墓后的情景,插入句提到了一些细节,尤其提到第三个古墓里埃及法老的木乃伊和金子。这些细节是第一句话的顺应发展,保持了意思的完整性并具有逻辑性,所以插入句应该插入第二个方框处。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ghfO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
Completetheformbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Completethesentencesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.Studentsneedafrontdoorkeybetween【T15】___
Completetheexplanationoftheroomnumber.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Completethetablebelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.WhatTHREEitemsofclothingdoesthespeakerrecommendfortherainforest?
Bilingualismcanbedefinedashavinganequallevelofcommunicative______intwoormorelanguages.
Bilingualismcanbedefinedashavinganequallevelofcommunicative______intwoormorelanguages.
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?TherearemanylegendsabouttheworldfamousEgyptianPharaohs’tombs,whichhavelainsilentf
DorothyCrowfootHodgkinWhenDorothyCrowfootHodgkinwastenyearsold,shewatchedherfirstcrystalsformonastringda
随机试题
依所承揽的工作内容的不同,下列属于承揽合同的有()
下列规范性文件,属于部门规章的是()。
如果发包人提供设计的依据文件和基础资料超过规定期限()天以内,设计人规定的交付设计文件时间相应顺延。
建设工程监理评标中的响应性评审标准内容包括()。
简述班级授课制的优越性与局限性。
Poly-systemtheory
迄今为止,人类社会出现了道德发展的五种历史类型,即原始社会的道德、奴隶社会的道德、封建社会的道德、资本主义社会的道德、社会主义社会的道德。道德的发展历程表明
设有三个线性无关的特征向量,则a=_______.
以下程序的输出结果是()。min(){inti=0,a=0;while(i<20){for(;;){if((i%10)==0)break;elsei--;}
Publicworksprojectshavenotsignificantly______theunemploymentsituation.
最新回复
(
0
)