首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Annual Performance Reviews In theory, annual performance reviews are constructive and positive interactions between managers
Annual Performance Reviews In theory, annual performance reviews are constructive and positive interactions between managers
admin
2010-01-13
61
问题
Annual Performance Reviews
In theory, annual performance reviews are constructive and positive interactions between managers and employees working together to attain maximum performance and strengthen the organization. In reality, they often create division, (51) morale (士气) ,and spark anger and jealousy. (52) , although the object of the annual performance review is to improve performance, it often has the (53) result. A programmer at a brokerage (经纪) firm was shocked to learn at her annual performance review that she was denied a promotion (54) she wasn’t a "team player", What were the data used to make this (55) ? She didn’t smile in the company photo.
(56) this story might sound as if it came straight out of a comic strip, it is a true (57) of one woman’s experience. By following a few tips and guidelines (准则) from industry analysis, this kind of ordeal (厄运) can be avoided.
To end the year (58) a positive and useful performance review, managers and employees must start the year by working together to (59) clear goals and expectations.
It may be helpful to allow employees to submit a list of people (60) with the company who will be in a good position to (61) their performance at the end of the year; these people may be coworkers, suppliers, or even customers.
By checking employees progress at about nine months, managers can give them a chance to correct mistakes and provide (62) to those who need it before the year is out. When conducting the review, managers should (63) strengths and weaknesses during the past year and discuss future responsibilities, avoiding punishment or blame.
(64) , when employees leave their performance reviews, they should he focusing on (65) they can do in the year ahead, not worrying about what went into their files about the past.
选项
A、though
B、because
C、unless
D、while
答案
B
解析
此题属于语篇连接题。从逻辑关系看,she was denied promotion和she was not a“team player”之间是因果关系,结果在前,原因在后,故选B because。其余选项:A though,C unless和D都与本题在语法上不符。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gkGd777K
本试题收录于:
职称英语综合类基础题库职称英语分类
0
职称英语综合类基础
职称英语
相关试题推荐
CaribbeanIslandsWhatwouldyouseeifyoutookacruisetotheCaribbeanIslands?Palmtreesandcoconuts(椰子)?Whitebeaches
LookingtotheFutureWhenamagazineforhigh-schoolstudentsaskeditsreaderswhatlifewouldbelikeintwentyyears,th
LookingtotheFutureWhenamagazineforhigh-schoolstudentsaskeditsreaderswhatlifewouldbelikeintwentyyears,th
ArtificialSpeechBecausespeechisthemostconvenientformofcommunication,inthefuturewewantessentiallynaturalcon
HousesoftheFutureWhatwillhousesbelikeinthirtyyears’time?Noonereallyknows,butarchitectsaretryingtopredict
HousesoftheFutureWhatwillhousesbelikeinthirtyyears’time?Noonereallyknows,butarchitectsaretryingtopredict
TheEye’sAdaptationtoColorAsoneworkswithcolorinapracticalorexperimentalway;oneisimpressedbytwoapparently
ThepeopleofKiribatiworrythatonedaytheircountrywillbetakenawaybyasuddenhightide.Thecoralislandnationsoft
EnergyandPublicLandsTheUnitedStatesboastssubstantialenergyresources.FederallandsprovideagooddealofUSenerg
RobotsMayAllowSurgeryinSpaceSmallrobotsdesignedbyUniversityofNebraskaresearchersmayallowdoctorsonEarthto
随机试题
急性肾衰竭血液透析指征为
中年男性患者,发现视力下降2天,右眼视力降至0.5,左眼0.6,眼底检查发现双眼视盘边界稍模糊,视盘充血。黄斑部可疑水肿。证实这一诊断的重要检查应当包括
下列不属于药物衣的是
在进行桥梁承载能力检算时,承载能力检算系数Z1作为结构抗力效应的修正系数,其值不大于1。()
下列关于商用房贷款的签约流程表述错误的是()。
下列事项中,应确认预计负债的有()。
下列权力不属于公安机关的侦查权的是()
A、76B、123C、171D、514B前两个圆圈中数字的规律:11×2+25+7=54,36×2+29+5=106,则问号处数字应为7×9+13+47=123,故选B。
AnOhioStateUniversitystudyhaslinkedbehaviorinyoungchildren【1】thetypeofjobtheirmotherhas.Motherswithcomplexoc
A、Shepainteditbyherself.B、Shehiredherbrothertopaintit.C、Itneedstobepainted.D、Itisn’tbeautifullypainted.B语义理
最新回复
(
0
)