首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Doctors alone must make the final decision whether to withdraw treatment, including artificial feeding, and allow a terminally i
Doctors alone must make the final decision whether to withdraw treatment, including artificial feeding, and allow a terminally i
admin
2011-01-10
63
问题
Doctors alone must make the final decision whether to withdraw treatment, including artificial feeding, and allow a terminally ill patient to die, according to British Medical Association guidelines published yesterday.
They must consult the family, take into account views of the patient and get a second medical opinion. But ultimately the responsibility rests with the doctor, and if the family disagrees it can only challenge his or her decision in the courts.
Members of the BMA’s ethics committee, which produced the guidelines, said they were not a charter for euthanasia.
"This is not about intending to kill people. It is about intending to withdraw what people believe to be useless or non-beneficial interventions," said Raanan Gillon, a GP and professor of medical ethics at Imperial College, London. "It is the difference between foreseeing death as the outcome and intending it."
Opponents of euthanasia rejected this distinction. "I am deeply concerned that some doctors might interpret the guidelines to increase the number of unnatural deaths," said Dr Andrew Fergusson, chairman of the pressure group Healthcare Opposed to Euthanasia.
"I recognize these are very difficult matters, but I am anxious about even more power being given to doctors in the apparent absence of adequate safeguards. This guidance will be bad for some patients."
The BMA has produced the guidelines because of confusion and uncertainly among doctors over how to proceed when treatment is doing more harm than good—perhaps in the case of unsuccessful chemotherapy for cancer—or when a patient is incapacitated after a severe stroke or advanced dementia.
The House of Lords judgment in the 1993 Bland case has muddied the waters. Tony Bland was in a persistent vegetative state (PVS) after the Hillsborough disaster. The courts backed the BMA view that the artificial feeding and hydration through a tube that were keeping him alive were medical treatments.
His father won permission to have all treatments stopped and his son was allowed to die. But the Lords stated that their ruling applied only to patients in PVS and suggested each case should be referred in turn to the courts.
The BMA guidelines make clear that they feel there is no such need in cases other than PVS. These are hard decisions, but doctors are well qualified to make them. If the decision involves stopping artificial nutrition and hydration, which the document accepts is an emotive issue, then a second opinion from a specialist unconnected with the case must be sought.
The doctor must try to ascertain the patient’s own wishes. The views of children under 16 who are capable of understanding must be respected and their parents’ views sought. Living wills requesting no further treatment must be complied with.
With patients who cannot communicate, doctors must consider among other things whether the invasiveness and pain of treatment are justifiable, how likely is any improvement and how aware patients are of the world around them.
The document accuses society of "unrealistic expectations.., about the extent to which it is possible to postpone death."
But SOS-NHS Patients in Danger, a pressure group formed by relatives of patients who have died in hospital, rejected the guidelines outright.
It said: "A terminally iii patient, with weeks, months and (who knows) even years to live would not benefit from having their death hastened for the convenience of medical staff and managers when they and their family might have other plans for how they wish to spend their precious remaining time together."
Before making the final decision whether to withdraw treatment, the doctor, according to the guidelines,______.
选项
A、should refer the case to a court for approval
B、should persuade the relatives of the patient to agree to withdrawing treatment
C、should do his best to find out what the patient wants
D、should first consider whether doing so is justifiable from the point of ethics
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gmcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
ThegeneralmanagerdemandedthejobwillbecompletedbeforetheSpringFestivalholidays.
Doctorswarnedsun-starvedtouristswhoreceivedtoomuchsunlightthattheywereatseriousriskthanothersofcontractingski
Everygrouphasaculture,howeveruncivilizeditmayseemtous.Totheprofessionalanthropologist,thereisnointrinsicsupe
Helostallhismoney.Theonlythinghecoulddowastocallhiswifeforhelpatthismoment.
Although"namingrights"haveproliferatedinAmericanhighereducationforthepastseveraldecades,thephenomenonhasrecentl
Thesearchforeternalyouthisnolessferventnowthanitwas2,000yearsago.Peoplearetryingpracticallyanything.
Annie’shusbandinvitedustoapartyheldfortheirweddinganniversaryandaskedustokeepasecret.Isurespoiledthesurpr
Inthisnewworldthemostdangerousconflictswillnotbebetweensocialclassesorothereconomicallydefinedgroups,butbetw
当前,亚欧两地区都处于蓬勃发展的阶段。亚洲是世界上最具经济活力的地区,资源丰富,市场广阔,区域合作方兴未艾。欧盟是世界上最大的发达经济体,资本充裕,科技先进,一体化程度高。两地区政治上共识很多,经济上优势互补,文化上各具特色,为开展更广泛和具有实质性的对话
就这种照相机而言,我们可能在市场上找到更便宜的型号,但考虑到它的质量和设计,你会同意我们的价格是最有竞争性的。关键词汇:asfor:至于;favorable:更好,更讨人喜欢。这个句子需要注意的是整个句子是比较。做笔记时需要记下他们比较的内容,quali
随机试题
土地使用权出让合同约定的使用年限届满,土地使用者需要继续使用土地的,应当至迟于期满前()向土地管理部门提出申请,经批准续期的,应当重新签订土地使用权出让合同,按规定支付地价款并更换土地权属证件。
医学决定水平能为病人诊断、治疗和预后:()
肠外营养液的配制应注意
当事人可对某些诉讼事项进行约定,法院应尊重合法有效的约定。关于当事人的约定及其效力,下列哪些表述是错误的?(2014年卷三79题,多选)
S国是一个新成立的国家。其成立后,甲国代表向联合国大会提案支持s国成为联合国的会员国;乙国与S国签署了两国互助同盟友好条约;丙国允许S国在其首都设立商业旅游服务机构;丁国与S国共同参加了某项贸易规则的多边谈判会议。根据国际法的有关规则,上述哪些国家的行为构
在车床上主要加工回转表面,其中包括()等。
行动研究起源于美国,以解决工作情景中的实际问题为主要目的,有利于教师实现自我反思,改进教育教学工作。()
消防人员用鼓风机扑灭森林大火的原理是()。
既有固定汇率制的可信性又有浮动汇率制的灵活性的汇率制度是()。
A、 B、 C、 B
最新回复
(
0
)