首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Doctors alone must make the final decision whether to withdraw treatment, including artificial feeding, and allow a terminally i
Doctors alone must make the final decision whether to withdraw treatment, including artificial feeding, and allow a terminally i
admin
2011-01-10
74
问题
Doctors alone must make the final decision whether to withdraw treatment, including artificial feeding, and allow a terminally ill patient to die, according to British Medical Association guidelines published yesterday.
They must consult the family, take into account views of the patient and get a second medical opinion. But ultimately the responsibility rests with the doctor, and if the family disagrees it can only challenge his or her decision in the courts.
Members of the BMA’s ethics committee, which produced the guidelines, said they were not a charter for euthanasia.
"This is not about intending to kill people. It is about intending to withdraw what people believe to be useless or non-beneficial interventions," said Raanan Gillon, a GP and professor of medical ethics at Imperial College, London. "It is the difference between foreseeing death as the outcome and intending it."
Opponents of euthanasia rejected this distinction. "I am deeply concerned that some doctors might interpret the guidelines to increase the number of unnatural deaths," said Dr Andrew Fergusson, chairman of the pressure group Healthcare Opposed to Euthanasia.
"I recognize these are very difficult matters, but I am anxious about even more power being given to doctors in the apparent absence of adequate safeguards. This guidance will be bad for some patients."
The BMA has produced the guidelines because of confusion and uncertainly among doctors over how to proceed when treatment is doing more harm than good—perhaps in the case of unsuccessful chemotherapy for cancer—or when a patient is incapacitated after a severe stroke or advanced dementia.
The House of Lords judgment in the 1993 Bland case has muddied the waters. Tony Bland was in a persistent vegetative state (PVS) after the Hillsborough disaster. The courts backed the BMA view that the artificial feeding and hydration through a tube that were keeping him alive were medical treatments.
His father won permission to have all treatments stopped and his son was allowed to die. But the Lords stated that their ruling applied only to patients in PVS and suggested each case should be referred in turn to the courts.
The BMA guidelines make clear that they feel there is no such need in cases other than PVS. These are hard decisions, but doctors are well qualified to make them. If the decision involves stopping artificial nutrition and hydration, which the document accepts is an emotive issue, then a second opinion from a specialist unconnected with the case must be sought.
The doctor must try to ascertain the patient’s own wishes. The views of children under 16 who are capable of understanding must be respected and their parents’ views sought. Living wills requesting no further treatment must be complied with.
With patients who cannot communicate, doctors must consider among other things whether the invasiveness and pain of treatment are justifiable, how likely is any improvement and how aware patients are of the world around them.
The document accuses society of "unrealistic expectations.., about the extent to which it is possible to postpone death."
But SOS-NHS Patients in Danger, a pressure group formed by relatives of patients who have died in hospital, rejected the guidelines outright.
It said: "A terminally iii patient, with weeks, months and (who knows) even years to live would not benefit from having their death hastened for the convenience of medical staff and managers when they and their family might have other plans for how they wish to spend their precious remaining time together."
Before making the final decision whether to withdraw treatment, the doctor, according to the guidelines,______.
选项
A、should refer the case to a court for approval
B、should persuade the relatives of the patient to agree to withdrawing treatment
C、should do his best to find out what the patient wants
D、should first consider whether doing so is justifiable from the point of ethics
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gmcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
ThefactthatmostAmericansliveinurbanareasdoesnotmeanthattheyresideinthecenteroflargecities.Infact,moreAme
Ourcompanywillprovideyouwithfreetransportationasyourequestedandchargetheinstallation.
OfalltheemployedworkersintheUnitedStates,12.5millionarepartofatemporaryworkforce.TheUnitedStatesBureauofLa
AnIndiananthropologist,ChandraThapar,madeastudyofforeigncultures,whichhadcustomssimilarto【C1】______ofhisnative
IntheUnitedStatesandinmanyothercountriesaroundtheworld,therearefourmainwaysforpeopletobe【C1】______aboutdeve
Securitymenbelievethetit-for-tatmurdersweretheresultofthebombingwhichhadoccurredinthecitycenter.
女士们、先生们:晚上好。我想首先扼要地说一下中国的现状。大家知道,中国实行改革开放已走过了25年。在短短的四分之一个世纪里,中国取得了前所未有的重大进步和发展。25年前,中国的GDP只有l,473亿美元,而去年已达到14,000
1986年全国人大常委会副委员长班禅喇嘛在西康地区大法会上教诲信徒们,要爱惜民族团结,维护祖国统一。在中国,公民的信仰自由受到法律保护。目前全西藏在寺僧尼约有14,000多人,另有800位宗教界人士在各级人大、政协、佛教协会和政府部门中工作。
高学历意味着高收入,这已经不再是秘密。据人口普查局近期出台的一项报告表明,大学毕业生的年收入约为51000美元,高中毕业生年薪约为28000美元,高中肄业者一年则只赚19000美元。不过七年前,即新千年开始时,收人差距开始缩小,大学毕业生当时收入为高中毕
到2008年,旅游业将成为这个国家的第二大产业。在2000年至2005年间,来到中国的外国游客的人数增加了80%。在2006年,海外游客人数为2,340万。估计有35%的游客来自欧洲和北美,其他则来自于亚洲和世界其他地方。商务旅行占所有海外旅游收入的二分之
随机试题
拉开隔离开关时应先拉负载侧,后拉母线侧,合上时与拉开时顺序________。
简述基层群众性自治组织的特点。
下列疾病中,以假小叶形成为主要病理改变的是()。
对建筑进行火灾风险评估时,应确定评估对象可能面临的火灾风险。关于火灾风险识别的说法中,错误的是()。
某公共建筑内设置喷头1000只,根据现行国家标准《自动喷水灭火系统施工及验收规范》(GB50261),对喷淋系统进行验收时,应对现场安装的喷头规格、安装间距分别进行抽查,分别抽查的喷头数量应为()。
德国飞机制造商从鲨鱼“皮肤”上得到启示,用于机身表面,飞机可以节省燃料8%,这是利用()解决问题。
一些人有这样一种思想误区,即只讲“实现自身价值”,不讲“提高自身价值”。人当然天生就有价值,这价值应当重视,但还有待提高。提高不能靠包装与炒作,必须要真正提高质量,具体表现无非就是德与才。这两方面的提高,只有通过克己修身。“玉不琢,不成器”,人不克己修身,
暴雨:洪灾:排涝
Everyonehasclimbeduptothetopofthemountain,______?
Nextweekwe(sign)______thesalescontractwiththenewsupplier.
最新回复
(
0
)