首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-06-11
54
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence " suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very longwave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that(electromagnetic fields)present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The main idea of this passage is______.
选项
A、studies on the cause of cancer
B、controversial view-points in the cause of cancer
C、the relationship between electricity and cancer
D、different ideas about the effect of electricity on cancer
答案
D
解析
文章首段就提出了“电会致癌吗?”这个问题。研究似乎表示:接触电磁场可能会增加患白血病和其他恶性肿瘤的危险性。第二段公布了环保署的报告,第三段说明:即使有致癌危险也是极微的,但应予以认真对待,进行更多的研究。而第七段中空军方面的科学家还没有被说服,他们明确提出,我们的评论员认为没有迹象说明环境中存在的电力会诱发或促发癌症。所以整篇文章都在阐述电力对癌症影响的不同观点,故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gyFO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Americansarehighly_____,andthereforemayfinditdifficulttobecomedeeplyinvolvedwithothers.
In1994theClintonAdministrationthrewitsdiplomaticandmilitarypowerbehindHaiti’soustedPresi-dentJean-BertrandAristi
"Governmentsthatwanttheirpeopletoprosperintheburgeoningworldeconomyshouldguaranteetwobasicrights:therighttopr
Howmanythingscanyouseeinthenightsky?Alot!OnaclearnightyoumightseetheMoon,someplanets,andthousandsofspar
He’swatchingTV?He’s_____tobecleaninghisroom.
FoodanddrinkplayamajorroleinChristmascelebrationsinmostcountries,butinfewmoresothaninMexico.Manyfamiliesov
Therecenteconomiccrisishasbroughtabouta_____inworldtrade.
Oneofthebasiccharacteristicsofcapitalismistheprivateownershipofthemajormeansofproduction—capital.Theownershi
Therecentnewsofthesuccessfulcloningofanadultsheep—inwhichthesheep’sDNAwasinsertedintoanunfertilizedsheepe
Thereareincreasinglyfraughtrelationshipsthatadultsarehavingwithchildren—inallwalksoflife,fromthepoliceandpoli
随机试题
我国古代,金銮殿、寺庙、官府等建筑物在选址时所取的朝向是____。
简述金融监管必要性。
某女,43岁。外阴奇痒,白带呈豆渣样。妇科检查:阴道粘膜附有白色膜状物,阴道分泌物悬滴涂片可见芽孢和假菌丝。治疗宜选
A、蒽醌类B、木脂素C、二萜类D、香豆素类E、二氢黄酮类和厚朴酚的结构类型是()。
患者,男性,25岁,上腹灼痛,反酸,疼痛多出现在早上10点及下午4点左右,有时夜间痛醒,进食后缓解。X线钡餐检查:十二指肠溃疡。若其胃酸中检查出幽门螺杆菌,则应选择的联合用药是()。
下列关于行政主体的说法不正确的有()。
A、 B、 C、 D、 B
请运用中国法制史的理论和知识对下列材料进行分析,并回答问题:《唐律疏议.名例律》:“诸五品以上妾,犯非十恶者,流罪以下,听以赎论。”(疏)议日:“五品以上之官,是为‘通贵’。妾之犯罪,不可配决。若犯非十恶,流罪以下,听用赎论;其赎条内不合赎者,亦不在赎限
高度为h(t)(t为时间)的雪堆在融化过程中,其侧面满足z=h(t)-[2(x2+y2)]/h(t)已知体积减少的速度与侧面积成正比,且比例系数为0.9,问高度为130的雪堆全部融化需要多少时间(其中长度单位是cm,时间单位为h)?
Whatdoesthewomanmean?
最新回复
(
0
)