2. 考研
  3. All around the world, lawyers generate more hostility than the members of any other profession—with the possible exception of jo

All around the world, lawyers generate more hostility than the members of any other profession—with the possible exception of jo

admin2021-01-06  36
问题     All around the world, lawyers generate more hostility than the members of any other profession—with the possible exception of journalism. But there are few places where clients have more grounds for complaint than America.
    During the decade before the economic crisis, spending on legal services in America grew twice as fast as inflation. The best lawyers made skyscrapers-full of money, tempting ever more students to pile into law schools. But most law graduates never get a big-firm job. Many of them instead become the kind of nuisance-lawsuit filer that makes the tort system a costly nightmare.
    There are many reasons for this. One is the excessive costs of a legal education. There is just one path for a lawyer in most American states: a four-year undergraduate degree in some unrelated subject, then a three-year law degree at one of 200 law schools authorized by the American Bar Association and an expensive preparation for the bar exam. This leaves today’s average law-school graduate with $ 100,000 of debt on top of undergraduate debts. Law-school debt means that they have to work fearsomely hard.     Reforming the system would help both lawyers and their customers. Sensible ideas have been around for a long time, but the state-level bodies that govern the profession have been too conservative to implement them. One idea is to allow people to study law as an undergraduate degree. Another is to let students sit for the bar after only two years of law school. If the bar exam is truly a stern enough test for a would-be lawyer, those who can sit it earlier should be allowed to do so. Students who do not need the extra training could cut their debt mountain by a third.
    The other reason why costs are so high is the restrictive guild-like ownership structure of the business. Except in the District of Columbia, non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm. This keeps fees high and innovation slow. There is pressure for change from within the profession, but opponents of change among the regulators insist that keeping outsiders out of a law firm isolates lawyers from the pressure to make money rather than serve clients ethically.
    In fact, allowing non-lawyers to own shares in law firms would reduce costs and improve services to customers, by encouraging law firms to use technology and to employ professional managers to focus on improving firms’ efficiency. After all, other countries, such as Australia and Britain, have started liberalizing their legal professions. America should follow.
The guild-like ownership structure is considered "restrictive" partly because it______.
选项 A、bans outsiders’ involvement in the profession
B、keeps lawyers from holding law-firm shares
C、aggravates the ethical situation in the trade
D、prevents lawyers from gaining due profits
答案A
解析 细节题。由题干关键词The guild—like ownership structure和restrictive定位到第五段第一句。第一句中指明这种协会性质的所有制结构对行业发展不利，接着第二、三句进一步解释了不利的原因，那就是这种只有律师才能拥有律师事务所股权的规定使得律师费居高不下，创新极为缓慢，结合该段最后一句可知，“将局外人排斥在律师事务所之外”是该种所有制结构有“限制性”的原因，故[A]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/hV1Z777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)