首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2014-01-07
72
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
The following aroused public resentment EXCEPT
选项
A、political power.
B、high fares.
C、economic loss.
D、indifference.
答案
C
解析
本题的相关信息在最后一段。A、B、D都被提到,只有C的内容未被提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/hfFK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Depressingreportsabouthowquicklytheworld’stropicalforestsarebeingfelledarecommonplace.Butdepressingreportsabout
WhatwasthereactionofthosetwobodiesfinedbytheInformationCommissioner?
WhatwasthereactionofthosetwobodiesfinedbytheInformationCommissioner?
TheUniversityofSouthernCaliforniahasthelargestnumberofinternationalstudentssince
WhenChristopherColumbuslandedonAmerica’sshores,heencounteredcopper-shinnedpeoplewhomhepromptlycalled"Indians".Cu
Howistheinformationorganizedinthelecture?
Whydidtheprotestersspillbloodinfrontoftheprimeminister’soffice?
Anniversariesaretimesforreflection,andthisoneshouldbenoexception,forthe30-yearhistoryofAIDSisaminorinwhich
AnAustralianresearchgroupmayeasehumanity’scollectiveconscienceoveraspateofprehistoricextinctionsonthesouthernc
Bosseswoulddowelltobealarmed.Novemberishere,andwithitagoodchancethatthebackofficeisn’tprocessingdata,but
随机试题
简述新闻采访的基本任务。
管理
急性心肌梗死出现以下哪些心律失常提示有发生心室颤动的危险
患者,男,40岁。有上腹受伤致肝破裂。意识清楚,上腹部明显压痛,面色苍白,四肢湿冷,脉搏130次/分,血压80/60mmHg,尿少,口渴,过度换气。立即给患者快速补充血容量,宜首先输注
近年来,导致全球交易所由会员制向公司制发展的因素有()。
以技术分析为基础的投资策略是在否定弱势有效市场的前提下,以历史交易数据为基础的调查研究模型。()
以下物权可以在同一物并存的是()。
下列各句中没有语病的一句是()。
新闻出版总署有关负责人的表态,让一度______的“记者黑名单”风波,有了一个官方定论。这位负责人说:“对新闻媒体存在的报道内容个别细节不准确的问题,不应该采取求全责备的态度。”新闻出版总署的表态,值得多方______。依次填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是(
中断是CPU与外部设备数据交换的重要方式。CPU响应中断时必须具备三个条件,分别为:外部提出中断请求;本中断未屏蔽;(4)。CPU响应中断后,必须由(5)提供地址信息,引导程序进入中断服务子程序:中断服务程序的入口地址存放在(6)中。
最新回复
(
0
)