首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2014-01-07
33
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
The following aroused public resentment EXCEPT
选项
A、political power.
B、high fares.
C、economic loss.
D、indifference.
答案
C
解析
本题的相关信息在最后一段。A、B、D都被提到,只有C的内容未被提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/hfFK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Somecollegesexpresstheirdisapprovalsofstudentsinvestinginstockmarketbecausetheyconsideritasadistractionforthe
WhichofthefollowingisINCORRECT?
AsimplepieceofropehangsbetweensomeenvironmentallyfriendlyAmericansandtheirneighbors.Ononesidestandthosewhoha
Mostworthwhilecareersrequiresomekindofspecializedtraining.Ideally,therefore,thechoiceofa(n)【C1】______shouldbema
WhenChristopherColumbuslandedonAmerica’sshores,heencounteredcopper-shinnedpeoplewhomhepromptlycalled"Indians".Cu
WhenChristopherColumbuslandedonAmerica’sshores,heencounteredcopper-shinnedpeoplewhomhepromptlycalled"Indians".Cu
Chinesee-commercecompanyAlibabaGroupplanstotakeitsHongKong-listedunitprivate,twosourcesfamiliarwiththematters
Publicacceptanceofrabbitasaneconomicalsourceofproteindependson______.
Inmyneighborhoodintheearly1980s,wespentthesummerplayingkickball.Ourfrontlawnswereaconstant.Wetooktheirsoft
TherateofHIV/AIDSinfectioninWashingtonDC
随机试题
关于肾上腺素作用,下列说法正确的是()。
汇率的两种基本标价法是()
A.运动性失语B.感觉性失语C.命名性失语D.完全性失语E.失读症患者听觉正常,但不能听懂别人说话,所讲话的内容也无法使人理解属于
常见的竞争者反映模式主要有()。
购买经济适用房所需要的条件包括下列所述的哪几项()①有当地城镇户口者或当地政府确定的供应对象②无房或现住房面积低于当地政府规定标准的住房困难家庭③家庭人口在三人或三人以上④家庭收入符合当地政府划定的收入线标准等
根据弗里德曼的理论,态度包含三个组成成分,下列说法中错误的是()。
推动教育学发展的内在动力是()。
疑病现象是指人们将自己轻微的不适现象看成严重疾病,反复多次检查的现象,特别是当亲友、邻居、同事因某病英年早逝和意外死亡后更容易出现这种现象。但检查如排除相关疾病后能接受医生的劝告,属正常现象。根据定义,下列不属于疑病现象的是()。
宽带城域网的网络平台的层次结构可分为()、()和()3个。
在引入虚拟页式存储管理的系统中,会出现下列哪些现象?()
最新回复
(
0
)