首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2014-01-07
76
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
The following aroused public resentment EXCEPT
选项
A、political power.
B、high fares.
C、economic loss.
D、indifference.
答案
C
解析
本题的相关信息在最后一段。A、B、D都被提到,只有C的内容未被提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/hfFK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingisINCORRECT?
Thesimpleactofsurrenderingatelephonenumbertoastoreclerkmaynotseemharmful—somuchsothatmanyconsumersdoitwit
Mostworthwhilecareersrequiresomekindofspecializedtraining.Ideally,therefore,thechoiceofa(n)【C1】______shouldbema
Thefilmbroughtthehoursbacktome______Iwastakengoodcareofinthatfar-awayvillage.
FormerU.S.presidentJimmyCarteronSundaycondemnedaunilateralU.S.attackonIraq
Inmyneighborhoodintheearly1980s,wespentthesummerplayingkickball.Ourfrontlawnswereaconstant.Wetooktheirsoft
Whydoesthewomansaythe"dinner"questionistough?
EveryoneintheofficeknowsthatMelindatakesinfinitecareoverherwork.Theunderlinedpartmeans______.
Bosseswoulddowelltobealarmed.Novemberishere,andwithitagoodchancethatthebackofficeisn’tprocessingdata,but
随机试题
A.皮内注射B.皮下注射C.肌内注射D.静脉注射E.股静脉注射地塞米松5~10mg抗过敏时,其采用的给药途径是
伪造、变造会计凭证和会计账薄的行政责任有()。
甲企业属于粮食购销企业,由于城镇规划,拆迁原仓库后,有近两亩的空地,办理有关手续后,甲企业决定与建筑商乙企业联合开发,甲企业出土地,建筑商乙企业出资金,建成后的房产50%归甲企业,50%归建筑商乙企业,甲企业所得的50%的房产准备全部出售。要求:上述业
培训服务协议条款包括()。(2006年11月二级真题)
教育目的有()的作用。
县级以上人民政府公安机关,经()批准,对严重危害社会治安秩序的突发事件,可以根据情况实行现场管制。
事物的质是指()。
一艘船顺流而下速度为50千米/小时,航速不变,顺水航行4小时和逆水航行8小时的航程相等,则此船不开动发动机顺水漂流2小时航程为
AlthoughtherearemanyskillfulBraillereaders,thousandsofotherblindpeoplefinditdifficulttolearnthatsystem.Theya
【S1】【S6】
最新回复
(
0
)