首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2014-01-07
48
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
The following aroused public resentment EXCEPT
选项
A、political power.
B、high fares.
C、economic loss.
D、indifference.
答案
C
解析
本题的相关信息在最后一段。A、B、D都被提到,只有C的内容未被提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/hfFK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
WhatwasthereactionofthosetwobodiesfinedbytheInformationCommissioner?
WhenChristopherColumbuslandedonAmerica’sshores,heencounteredcopper-shinnedpeoplewhomhepromptlycalled"Indians".Cu
Chinesee-commercecompanyAlibabaGroupplanstotakeitsHongKong-listedunitprivate,twosourcesfamiliarwiththematters
AnAustralianresearchgroupmayeasehumanity’scollectiveconscienceoveraspateofprehistoricextinctionsonthesouthernc
Fromheat-hazeandsummersmogtooutsizehailstonesandflashfloods:moretopsyturvyweatherisontheway,Britain’sforecast
Whenonespouseisdepressed,amarriageisdepressed.Thisillnesserodesemotionalandsexualintimacyandmakesarelationshi
Bosseswoulddowelltobealarmed.Novemberishere,andwithitagoodchancethatthebackofficeisn’tprocessingdata,but
Whenaskedto______theageoftheantique,youneedtohaveaspecialknowledgeofthehistory.
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,buthistoryshowstheycanalsobehighlyeffective.
随机试题
为提高筛检试验的灵敏度,可以对几个独立试验进行
结核病青霉素过敏性休克
造成黏冲的原因是
下列关于热力管道回填说法正确的是()。
可转换债券的初始转股价格可因()情况进行调整。
2009年1月1日甲公司向张某借款100000元,借款期限1年,年利率8%,当年12月收到利息。从沪市交易所取得股息2000元。张某2009年利息、股息收入应缴纳个人所得税()元。(不考虑其他税费)
1950年6月,毛泽东在七届三中全会上作的重要讲话是《论十大关系》。()
对“生态整体主义”这一概念理解准确的一项是:下列对“生态整体超越了以人类利益为根本尺度的人类中心主义”这句话的理解不正确的一项是:
ChangesinMuseumsMuseumshavechanged.Theyarenolongerplacesthatone"should"visit;theyareplacestoenjoyandlea
Whatisdisplayedintheexhibition?
最新回复
(
0
)