首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2014-01-07
43
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
The following aroused public resentment EXCEPT
选项
A、political power.
B、high fares.
C、economic loss.
D、indifference.
答案
C
解析
本题的相关信息在最后一段。A、B、D都被提到,只有C的内容未被提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/hfFK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
ThemanwantedthewomantobringthefollowingEXCEPT
Depressingreportsabouthowquicklytheworld’stropicalforestsarebeingfelledarecommonplace.Butdepressingreportsabout
WhatwasthereactionofthosetwobodiesfinedbytheInformationCommissioner?
TheUniversityofSouthernCaliforniahasthelargestnumberofinternationalstudentssince
Mostworthwhilecareersrequiresomekindofspecializedtraining.Ideally,therefore,thechoiceofa(n)【C1】______shouldbema
WhenChristopherColumbuslandedonAmerica’sshores,heencounteredcopper-shinnedpeoplewhomhepromptlycalled"Indians".Cu
OnSundaysmyfatheralwaysworethatdullgrayapron—theonewiththeracecarsalloverit.Theritualbeganafterbreakfastw
Anniversariesaretimesforreflection,andthisoneshouldbenoexception,forthe30-yearhistoryofAIDSisaminorinwhich
Whenonespouseisdepressed,amarriageisdepressed.Thisillnesserodesemotionalandsexualintimacyandmakesarelationshi
随机试题
赤芍具有而牡丹皮不具有的功效是
含气肺密度很低,是否会引起声波衰减
关于静脉肾盂造影的描述,错误的是
下列哪项不可能出现在坏死性唾液腺化生
腋窝Ⅰ组淋巴结位于
按照时间顺序,环境影响评价一般分为()。
背景资料某桥梁工程项目的建设单位与某一施工单位按照《建设工程施工合同(示范文本)》签订了桥梁施工合同。该桥梁上部结构为后张法预应力砼箱梁。合同价款为2600万元,合同工期为200天。在合同中,建设单位与施工单位约定,每提前或推后工期一天,按合同价的万分之
工程质量统计方法包括( )。
Thehistoryoftransportationisverylongandfullofchangesandinventions.Itstarts【C1】________walking,whichisnotanyi
Thefamilypianowas______beforeJack’smotheraskedhimtomoveit.Jackonlywantedto______.
最新回复
(
0
)