首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care refor
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care refor
admin
2021-02-21
43
问题
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care reform. The law, which requires chain restaurants to give consumers the information of calories on their menus, has initiated an intensive debate in the country. The implementation of the law means that when you look at a menu from a chain restaurant, those calorie counts will be staring you down. "Order me if you dare," the big Quesadilla Burger from Applebee’s (1,440 calories) may plead.
Nevertheless, the restaurant industry, the biggest opponent of the law, had been pushing a federal bill that would require chains nationwide to post calorie information somewhere near the point of purchase but not on the menu itself. The industry claimed menu postings would be a costly burden and would clutter valuable real estate on the menus. Not surprisingly, chains won’t voice the most obvious argument against high-profile calorie counts, because they’re concerned that consumers will be turned off by what they see.
As the menu-labeling momentum keeps surging, will such policy really improve eating habits? Well, it can do no worse than what’s out there. Researchers observed 4,311 consumers of McDonald’s, Burger King and Starbucks to see if they accessed in-store nutrition data. The info was not on the menu board but in a pamphlet, on a wall poster or an on-site computer. Only 0.1% of the consumers looked at the numbers. If restaurants are sincere about health, they need to put calorie counts on the menu, straight in the customers’ sight lines.
So far, compulsory on-the-menu calorie counts have been implemented in only three localities: Washington’s King County, New York City and Westchester County. And since none of these provisions have been in place for more than a year, nutritionists have yet to gather empirical proof that they work.
Although there is no direct evidence of its effectiveness, prominently displayed calorie counts has been found to steer purchases. Last year, researchers in New York City examined consumer eating habits at Subway, which voluntarily posted calorie info in its stores. This study reported that Subway customers who pondered the calorie information purchased 52 fewer calories than those who didn’t.
Further, the forced disclosure of calories could lead more restaurants to change their offerings. A report by New York City health officials noted that since menu-labeling went into effect last summer, some chains have lowered the calorie counts on certain items. For example, in last March, a Chicken Club sandwich at Wendy’s was listed as being 650 calories. In June this year, the item was 540 calories—a 17% drop.
Meanwhile, Yum! Brands, parent company of Kentucky Fried Chicken, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell, has promised to post calorie information on its menus by next January. If the creator of KFC’s Famous Bowls—fried chicken, mashed potatoes, corn, gravy and shredded cheese packed together for your gut-busting pleasure—volunteers to share these numbers, what excuse can other chains claim for not following suit, particularly if Washington lags in forcing them to do so? The writing is on the wall. And perhaps, as a result, fewer calories will be in your stomach.
[A] has seen the effect of displaying calorie information in its stores.
[B] has begun to reduce calories contained in some of its offerings.
[C] is one of the biggest opponents of the menu-labeling law.
[D] is one of the first localities where the menu-labeling law has been carried out.
[E] does not display nutrition data on its menu board.
[F] has volunteered to disclose calorie information on its menus.
[G] offers a big burger which contains a large amount of calories.
Applebee’s
选项
答案
G
解析
Applebee’s出现在第一段。该段最后一句说,Applebee’s的巨型凯萨迪亚汉堡(含1440卡路里)也许就要恳求你了:“有胆量的话就买我吧!”G中的big burger是文中的原词复现,a large amount of calories对应文中的1,440 calories,故确定G为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/i2Y4777K
0
考研英语二
相关试题推荐
ThemajordifferencebetweennarrativesalesandsuggestivesalesisthatMindycomparessalespeopletowinestewardsinthat_
Thingswentwellforhimduringhisearlylifebutinmiddleagehis______seemedtochange.
Accordingtothepassage,thefactthatyoungpeopleseemtobelosinginterestinscience______.Whichofthefollowingstate
In2010,afederaljudgeshookAmerica’sbiotechindustrytoitscore.CompanieshadwonpatentsforisolatedDNAfordecades--b
Priortothe20thcentury,manylanguageswithsmallnumbersofspeakerssurvivedforcenturies.Theincreasinglyinterconnected
Priortothe20thcentury,manylanguageswithsmallnumbersofspeakerssurvivedforcenturies.Theincreasinglyinterconnected
Iamaddictedtoelectricity.Soareyou.Andsoisyourbusiness.Weliveinan"alwayson"world—airconditioners,streetlight
ItisfashionabletodaytobashBigBusiness.Andthereisoneissueonwhichthemanycriticsagree:CEOpay.WehearthatCEOs
KeithHewson,a29-year-oldairlinepilot,hadn’tplannedtolivewithhisin-lawsafterhegotmarried.Buthequicklyrealized
随机试题
自然血亲
平面x+y+z=1与平面x+y-z=2的位置关系是()
患者,女性,32岁。突然寒战、高热,伴腰痛、尿频、尿急、尿痛3天就诊。查体:肾区有叩击痛。化验:尿蛋白(+)。镜检:白细胞满视野,白细胞管型0~2个/HP,最可能的诊断是
主要不良反应是心脏毒性的抗肿瘤药物是
A.气机阻滞,瘀血内结B.肝脾肾受损,气滞血瘀,水停腹中C.脾肺肾功能失调,水潴体内D.心肝脾功能失常,水结腹内E.肝脾肾受损,血郁脾内积聚的病机主要是
速效救心丸、冠心苏合滴丸、心可舒胶囊的共同功能是
静注硫喷妥钠作用维持短暂的主要原因是( )。
对企业培训进行正式评估的优点包括()。
主张回归自然,“复归”人的自然本性,认为一切顺其自然便是最好教育的是()。
教师职业良心同教师权利相联系,并从教师的教育教学劳动中表现出来。()
最新回复
(
0
)