首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care refor
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care refor
admin
2021-02-21
27
问题
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care reform. The law, which requires chain restaurants to give consumers the information of calories on their menus, has initiated an intensive debate in the country. The implementation of the law means that when you look at a menu from a chain restaurant, those calorie counts will be staring you down. "Order me if you dare," the big Quesadilla Burger from Applebee’s (1,440 calories) may plead.
Nevertheless, the restaurant industry, the biggest opponent of the law, had been pushing a federal bill that would require chains nationwide to post calorie information somewhere near the point of purchase but not on the menu itself. The industry claimed menu postings would be a costly burden and would clutter valuable real estate on the menus. Not surprisingly, chains won’t voice the most obvious argument against high-profile calorie counts, because they’re concerned that consumers will be turned off by what they see.
As the menu-labeling momentum keeps surging, will such policy really improve eating habits? Well, it can do no worse than what’s out there. Researchers observed 4,311 consumers of McDonald’s, Burger King and Starbucks to see if they accessed in-store nutrition data. The info was not on the menu board but in a pamphlet, on a wall poster or an on-site computer. Only 0.1% of the consumers looked at the numbers. If restaurants are sincere about health, they need to put calorie counts on the menu, straight in the customers’ sight lines.
So far, compulsory on-the-menu calorie counts have been implemented in only three localities: Washington’s King County, New York City and Westchester County. And since none of these provisions have been in place for more than a year, nutritionists have yet to gather empirical proof that they work.
Although there is no direct evidence of its effectiveness, prominently displayed calorie counts has been found to steer purchases. Last year, researchers in New York City examined consumer eating habits at Subway, which voluntarily posted calorie info in its stores. This study reported that Subway customers who pondered the calorie information purchased 52 fewer calories than those who didn’t.
Further, the forced disclosure of calories could lead more restaurants to change their offerings. A report by New York City health officials noted that since menu-labeling went into effect last summer, some chains have lowered the calorie counts on certain items. For example, in last March, a Chicken Club sandwich at Wendy’s was listed as being 650 calories. In June this year, the item was 540 calories—a 17% drop.
Meanwhile, Yum! Brands, parent company of Kentucky Fried Chicken, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell, has promised to post calorie information on its menus by next January. If the creator of KFC’s Famous Bowls—fried chicken, mashed potatoes, corn, gravy and shredded cheese packed together for your gut-busting pleasure—volunteers to share these numbers, what excuse can other chains claim for not following suit, particularly if Washington lags in forcing them to do so? The writing is on the wall. And perhaps, as a result, fewer calories will be in your stomach.
[A] has seen the effect of displaying calorie information in its stores.
[B] has begun to reduce calories contained in some of its offerings.
[C] is one of the biggest opponents of the menu-labeling law.
[D] is one of the first localities where the menu-labeling law has been carried out.
[E] does not display nutrition data on its menu board.
[F] has volunteered to disclose calorie information on its menus.
[G] offers a big burger which contains a large amount of calories.
Applebee’s
选项
答案
G
解析
Applebee’s出现在第一段。该段最后一句说,Applebee’s的巨型凯萨迪亚汉堡(含1440卡路里)也许就要恳求你了:“有胆量的话就买我吧!”G中的big burger是文中的原词复现,a large amount of calories对应文中的1,440 calories,故确定G为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/i2Y4777K
0
考研英语二
相关试题推荐
Theauthorthinksthatpullfactors______.People’sdecisionstomigratemightbeinfluencedbyallthefollowingEXCEPT____
Conveniencefoodhelpscompaniesbycreatinggrowth;butwhatisitseffectonpeople?Forpeoplewhothinkcookingwasthefoun
ThegiantMirafioriplantinTurinistheheartofFiatAuto,thetroubledcardivisionoftheFiatgroup.Astheearlyshifttr
Manyadultsmaythinkthey’regettingenoughshut-eye,butinamajorsleepstudyalmost80percentofrespondentsadmittedton
Technologyissupposedtomakeourliveseasier,allowingustodothingsmorequicklyandefficiently.Buttoooftenitseemst
LOSANGELES—Allyear,Hollywoodexecutiveshavebeenbrushingasideworriesaboutbox-officestagnationintheUnitedStatesand
ItisfashionabletodaytobashBigBusiness.Andthereisoneissueonwhichthemanycriticsagree:CEOpay.WehearthatCEOs
Banks,troubledbyregulatorsandshortofcapital,arefleeingthecommoditiesbusiness.DeutscheBank,MorganStanleyandUBS
Banks,troubledbyregulatorsandshortofcapital,arefleeingthecommoditiesbusiness.DeutscheBank,MorganStanleyandUBS
随机试题
A.近3个月内劳力诱发的心绞痛的频率和程度加重,对硝酸甘油的需求增加B.心绞痛发作与体力活动无关,可出现短暂sT段抬高C.心绞痛的发作与劳累有关,其性质在1~3个月内无改变D.既往无心绞痛或心肌梗死病史,近1~2个月内劳累时出现心绞痛E.劳累和休息
某人46岁,DMF指数为5,说明
患者男,28岁。车祸致头面部损伤半小时。查体:意识模糊,烦躁不安,面部轻度发绀,吸气时锁骨上窝、剑突下、肋间隙内陷。面部检查见上颌骨活动,下牙弓变窄,下前牙骨段活动、后移,口腔内元明显异物,口内及颈部无血肿。对该患者应采用的急救方法为
2011年3月31日,勤正公司有关账户期末余额及相关经济业务如下:(1)“库存现金”账户借方余额2000元,“银行存款”账户借方余额350000元,“其他货币资金”账户借方余额500000元。(2)“应收账款”总账账户借方余额350000元,其所属明细账户
前几年,我国空调行业开发的商用空凋其核心技术还要依赖进口,现在我同某著名家电产品生产企业——A公司进行自主开发,已掌握了商用空调的核心技术。目前针对不同用户的使用特点,已开发出嵌入式、吊顶落地式、风管式等6大系列100多种款式新颖功能齐备的空调产品,在国内
关于战略实施中的领导层的说法中,不正确的是()。
遗传决定论的观点包括()。
我国宪法修正案中,将“邓小平理论”写进宪法序言的是()
请根据以下各小题的要求设计VisualBasic应用程序(包括界面和代码)。(1)在Form1的窗体上画一个文本框,名称为Txt1;画一个命令按钮,名称为cmdDisplay,标题为“显示”,TabIndex属性为0。请为cmdDisplay
0.25×=_____
最新回复
(
0
)