首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How many times have the doctors tested the children for five years? Which of the following is NOT true?
How many times have the doctors tested the children for five years? Which of the following is NOT true?
admin
2009-08-15
57
问题
How many times have the doctors tested the children for five years?
Which of the following is NOT true?
选项
A、The mothers’ smoking during pregnancy could have affected the children’s lungs.
B、Doctors are sure that children whose mothers smoked developed 20% more colds, flu and other breathing diseases than other children.
C、Doctors are sure when the mothers’ smoking affected the children’s lungs.
D、Smoke-filled air at home could have affected the children’s lungs.
答案
C
解析
答案选C。根据文章,医生并不确定母亲抽烟到底在什么时候影响了孩子:是在怀孕时呢,还是孩子出生后呢?
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/i6fd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语二级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语二级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Wheredoestheconversationprobablytakeplace?
Whichistrueofthispassage?Whichstatementdoyouagreewithafteryourreading?
EnglishisaForeignLanguage.WhotaughtyoutospeakEnglish?Yourparents,whileyouwereayoungchild?Yourteachersatsch
Whentheheavysnowstarted,itwas______noon.
My______ofthisweekend’sactivityisgoingoutwithsomegoodfriends.
Noonehelpedme.Ididitall______myself.
Howdothewriter’sfriendsfeelaboutthedelayofhistrip?Howdoesthewriterfeelaboutthetripheisgoingtotake?
You’dbetter_________thewateruntilithasbeenboiled.
Iwanttorentahouse,well-equipped,comfortable,and______,inaquietplace.
In______sentencesthefirstthreeareacceptable,butnottheothertwo.
随机试题
Ifhehadnotbeenhurt______much,he’dneverresignfromoffice.
下列关于腹部损伤的描述正确的是
A、IVU检查B、肾动脉造影检查C、B超检查D、放射性核素扫描检查E、CT检查尿外渗时,应采取的检查是()
依据《城市房地产管理法》的规定,下列机构中()属于房地产中介服务机构。
二手房买卖成交正式签订成交合同后,经纪企业应协助客户办妥房产()手续。
房屋所有权人按照有关登记办法的规定,向房屋所在地的()申请产权登记。
()负责期货投资者保障基金业务监管,对保障基金的筹集、管理和使用等情况进行定期核查。
美国经济学家阿尔文.汉森于20世纪40年代提出()。
某知名手机生产企业,为满足年轻人的市场需求,不断研发新品种,开发适合年轻人的手机,走集中战略道路。2015年该企业在市场调研的基础上,推出一款专门针对年轻人的手机。生产该手机的固定成本为3000万元,单位变动成本为1500元,产品售价为3000元/部。
曾有媒体报道,某大学将五十四名正副教授“正式解聘”,并对这一所谓教授“下课”事件欢欣鼓舞,理由是我国实质上的“终身教授”制度形同大锅饭,一来“导致高校冗员众多”,二来致使教授不思进取。抑制竞争和创新。以下哪项为真,能有力地对上述措施提出质疑?
最新回复
(
0
)