首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
As the wealthiest nation in history debates whether we’re interested in paying our bills, it’s time to unmask the true cause of
As the wealthiest nation in history debates whether we’re interested in paying our bills, it’s time to unmask the true cause of
admin
2015-01-10
49
问题
As the wealthiest nation in history debates whether we’re interested in paying our bills, it’s time to unmask the true cause of our dysfunction; Neither Republicans nor Democrats are ultimately to blame. Instead, the problem lies at the antiquated core of the world’s oldest, creakiest democracy. More specifically, we must abolish that most heinous of institutions, the Electoral College. I’m not sure I’ve ever met anyone with a kind word to say about the College, a seemingly vestigial group that meets every four years to formally elect the president we all already voted for. Other countries with well-functioning governments have similar mysterious organs in place(call them the tonsils of democracy), but with a crucial difference: We’re the only nation on Earth to continue electing an executive president, as opposed to a figurehead, in this fashion.
Why is this such a problem? I present you with Exhibit A: whatever’s currently on the front page of today’s Tribune; Exhibit B: yesterday’s front page; Exhibit C: tomorrow’s; etc, etc. The slow-motion brain-flatulence of a government shutdown is a perfect example of the problems inherent to divided government, where two co-equal branches are pitted against one another, run by opposing leaders with no incentive to compromise. This paralysis is an inevitable outcome of a system dominated by two ideologically distinct parties, elected separately to three institutions meant to check and balance each other.
And yet, a simple tweak could dramatically decrease the odds of this division reoccurring, without requiring any major changes to our Constitution. Merely replacing the members of the Electoral College with the House of Representatives would ensure that, at least half the time, the president and the House were in alignment—and if we reformed the redistricting process to ensure truly democratic congressional elections, our government would function even more smoothly.
In this scenario, every four years, voters would elect congresspeople who would then elect a president, similar to how parliamentary systems choose a prime minister. In those elections, congressional races would function as a proxy for the presidential race—as they largely do already. Congressional elections have become nationalized, as most candidates align themselves with their party’s presidential nominee and run on national issues like the budget, gun control and health care, so this would be no great change.
There would still be a chance for gridlock, of course—for one thing, the Senate is left entirely out of this equation. In off-year elections, it’s possible that the president’s party would lose a majority in the House, ensuring the same divided government we have today. But such division would be guaranteed to end after two years, a fact that would dramatically alter the incentives for congressional leaders.
It’s certainly true that this alone isn’t a very dramatic reform, and that as long as we’re talking about constitutional amendments, why not go all-out and adopt a parliamentary system like most well-functioning Western governments? That might be a great idea, and political scientists have long noted that presidential systems have a pretty terrible track record, with America being the sole exception to an otherwise unbroken string of failures. But it just doesn’t seem politically possible to attempt such a wholesale revamp of our governance structure, particularly since the mere ratification of a constitutional amendment hasn’t happened in 21 years.
There is one objection to this idea that I take very seriously, however. Do we really feel comfortable putting the election of the president in the hands of America’ s most despised political institution, the House of Representatives? As currently constructed, of course not. For one thing, in 2012, Democrats won more than 1. 7 million more votes than Republicans in the House, and yet Republicans retained a 17-seat majority. That imbalance is antithetical to any democratic ideal, and it has to be fixed, whether or not we also allow the House to elect the president.
The solution that strikes me as the most reasonable is to inaugurate a national, nonpartisan redistricting agency, modeled on the one in place and working well in Iowa. That agency uses impartial software to automatically generate district lines that disregard all factors except population, boundaries then subject to approval by the legislature and governor. In Illinois, by contrast, a bipartisan committee draws those lines and, if the four Republicans and four Democrats on the committee can’t agree on a map, a ninth member is chosen by drawing a name from a replica of Abraham Lincoln’s hat. I wish I was kidding about that last bit. If our government is so badly broken that it all comes down to an idea seemingly stolen from a Harry Potter novel, is it any surprise that it can’t do its job?
Why does the author suggest replacing the members of the Electoral College with the House of Representatives? What is the problem with this remedy?
选项
答案
according to the author/if it is replaced by the latter/at least half the time of one term of the president/the president and the the House would be "in alignment"/if the redistricting process were reformed/to ensure truly democratic congressional elections/the government would function more smoothly/the problem; the House of Representatives is America’ s "most despised political institution"/the Americans do not have confidence in it(will surely not "feel comfortable" about it)/and the imbalance of the representatives of the two parties is opposite to ,"any democratic ideal"
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/iDSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Consideringtheageandhisfamily’spoorlivingconditionsandenvironments,hewasnotpunishedbythepoliceasheshouldhav
IftheyspendsometimeonChinesehistory,theywillbemoreabletopredictChina’sfuture.
Wereitnotforthemeasurestimelytakenlastyearbythecentralgovernment,thesebankscouldhavebeenclosed.
Neverbeforecanwewitnesssuchapreposterousstateofaffairsasweareseeingtoday.
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
ThehappiestpeopleintheworldmayliveinScandinavia,anewstudysuggests.That’saccordingtotheUnitedNationsGeneralA
随机试题
肺栓塞患者应进行溶栓治疗的情况是
压电法微量水分分析仪是用来测量气流中的(),可以用于测量氦、氩、氖、氙、氪、氧、氢、氮、一氧化氮、一氧化碳、二氧化碳、氢烷烃、天然气、制冷剂、空气等各种气体。
根据我国《民事诉讼法》规定,外国人的民事诉讼地位的问题,我国采用()
A/巴比妥钠B/盐酸普鲁卡因C/硫酸奎宁D/维生素AE/维生素C三点校正法
生物转运是指
钢筋混凝土排架结构中承受和传递横向水平荷载的构件是:
关于审判监督程序,下列说法正确的是()。
某公司在2009年10月31日的银行核对中发现,银行存款日记账账面余额为217300元,银行对账单余额为254690元,经逐笔核查,发现有如下未达账项:(1)企业未收,银行已收42100元;(2)企业已收,银行未收21600元;(3)企业未付,银行已付50
有A,B两个黑布袋,A布袋中有两个完全相同的小球,分别标有数字1和2.B布袋中有三个完全相同的小球,分别标有数字-1,-2和-3.小明从A布袋中随机抽出一个小球,记录其标有的数字为x,再从B布袋中随机抽出一个小球,记录其标有的数字为y.他用这两个数字确定一
【材料大意】近年来,随着我国工业化、城镇化进程的不断推进,越来越多的农民工涌入城市,他们为城市的发展做出了巨大的贡献。但是随之而来的人口迁移也带来了许多社会问题,尤其是农民工子女教育问题。打工子弟学校是城市为解决外来进城务工人员子女就学
最新回复
(
0
)