首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whose Grave is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for t
Whose Grave is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for t
admin
2013-08-12
36
问题
Whose Grave is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A)
hen Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.(B)
he tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.(C)
Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.(D)
There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable?
From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance.
Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself.
Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come(while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves).
The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up.
In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us.
Which of the following can be inferred from Paragraph 4 about the power of the curse of the Pharaoh’s tomb?
选项
A、It is supported by science.
B、It is a rumor denied by fact.
C、It is still a myth until today.
D、It does punish the disturbing people.
答案
B
解析
本题为推论题。题目问:关于第四段所提到的诅咒的力量,可以作出以下哪一项推论?根据本段,Carter团队中的一些人的意外死亡似乎应验了这一诅咒,但是Carter却在多年以后平静地去世。所以,这证明了谣言并不正确,已经被事实所否定,因此选B项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ihfO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
Completetheexplanationoftheroomnumber.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Completethetablebelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Betweenwhattimesistheroadtrafficlightest?
Betweenwhattimesistheroadtrafficlightest?
Bilingualismcanbedefinedashavinganequallevelofcommunicative______intwoormorelanguages.
Choosethecorrectletter,A,BorC.Therestaurantisfamousfor
(Asthe)highest-paidstarofthesilentscreen,(earning)a(reputedly)incomeof$20,000aweek,GloriaSwansonepitomized(t
AMessengerfromthePastHispeoplesaidgood-byeandwatchedhimwalkofftowardthemountains.Theyhadlittlereasonto
AMessengerfromthePastHispeoplesaidgood-byeandwatchedhimwalkofftowardthemountains.Theyhadlittlereasonto
AMessengerfromthePastHispeoplesaidgood-byeandwatchedhimwalkofftowardthemountains.Theyhadlittlereasonto
随机试题
Beingamanhasalwaysbeendangerous.Thereareabout105malesbornforevery100females,butthisratiodropstonearbalanc
与阿司匹林引起的反应无关的为
A.牙源性B.腺源性C.损伤性D.血源性E.医源性边缘性颌骨骨髓炎感染多为
固定资产在社会再生产过程中能够被长期使用,其物质形态的()和价值的转移是逐步进行的。
对于业主而言,采用固定总价合同形式发包工程,比较有利于业主控制()。《建设工程施工合同示范文本》规定,发包人(),不得以任何形式向分包人支付各种工程款。
一家银行声称给储户10%的年利率,每季度按复利计息,则一笔1000元的存款在两年后价值为()元。
2016年8月,国务院办公厅印发的《关于建立国有企业违规经营投资责任追究制度的意见》提出,在2017年年底前,国有企业违规经营投资()基本形成,责任追究的范围、标准、程序和方式清晰规范,责任追究工作实现有章可循。
马克思的一生有两大独创发现,分别是()。
若关系R和S的关系代数操作的结果如下,这是执行了______。
Atfirst,the______ofcolorpicturesoveralongdistanceseemedimpossible,but,withpainstakingeffortsandatgreatexpenses
最新回复
(
0
)