首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Current Challenges Confronting U.S. Higher Education The first challenge: force of the marketplace • Current situation : —pr
Current Challenges Confronting U.S. Higher Education The first challenge: force of the marketplace • Current situation : —pr
admin
2021-11-25
39
问题
Current Challenges Confronting U.S. Higher Education
The first challenge: force of the marketplace
• Current situation :
—presence of the marketplace as【T1】________external force
—government support;【T2】________
—public institutions asking for less government【T3】________
e.g. new legislation to provide【T4】________
• Results:
—higher institutional priorities given to【T5】________
because of their【T6】________
—ways to generate more money for institutions
—creating new programs, e.g. 【T7】________
—adding new units focusing on generating【T8】 ________
—building【T9】________
—implications
—increasing focus on 【T10】________in academic research
—higher tuition fees for students University administrators have to respond to the marketplace. The second challenge: equality in 【T11】________
• Post War massification of U.S. higher education;
—【T12】________
• Reasons:
—low【T13】________of racial and ethnic minorities
—inability of low-income individuals to【T14】________
• Government role:
—mediating the negative effects of competition in order to【T15】________
【T13】
Current Challenges Confronting U.S. Higher Education
Good morning, everyone. In our last lecture, we discussed challenges that face universities and colleges worldwide. Today, we’ll take a special look at U.S. higher education and see what challenges U.S. higher education is facing. OK. Let’s get started.
The first challenge we’re examining in today’s lecture is the force of the marketplace on higher education. [1] Many people believe that the marketplace has overtaken state government as the dominant external force shaping and reshaping American higher education, even for public colleges and universities. You may ask, "Why is It so?" [2] Well, as is always the case, government support is not keeping pace with educational expenditures. So in many ways, the market is having more bearing on higher education than government. [3] In order to create more flexibility, many public colleges and universities are now asking for less government regulation and supervision. In some instances, they are even asking for less state money in return for more autonomy. And their argument is that the current structures and accountability requirements have hindered their capacity to be effective and efficient. [4] The ability to set their own tuition fees and secure freedom from state policies and regulations in areas such as purchasing and building represent just some of the additional autonomy that public institutions are seeking. And many are pressing for new legislation to provide this freedom through a range of innovations, including public corporations, charter colleges, state enterprise status, and performance contracts.
So, what is the result of these efforts? [5/6] Well, the result is that activities and research in certain fields and disciplines, for example, engineering, applied natural science, and agricultural science, become higher institutional priorities because they have stronger market value than other programs, such as humanities, do. So, what has happened is that institutions create new programs, alter academic calendars, and
pursue different financial aid policies to capture more and better students, in particular, those who can afford to pay high tuition. [7] For instance, executive MBA programs are increasingly popular. Also, institutions seek contracts and partnership agreements, and enhance research programs with practical applications that have large financial payouts. In order to do so, they are changing their institutional structures. And how do they do it? Let me tell you. [8] Institutions would add new units that focus on generating external grants and bringing new technology to market. [9] They would build conference centers and create for-profit subsidiaries. All these are done to generate more revenue for institutions. What are the implications of this? [10] Well, the implications are that academic research is increasingly focused on marketable knowledge, entrepreneurial priorities are taking precedence, services are being outsourced, and students are carrying an increasing burden to pay higher tuition fees for their education.
Then, how do university administrators view this trend? That is, the marketplace is showing stronger impact on how institutions are run. In fact, university administrators see little option except to respond to the marketplace. The reason is, if their institution does not react effectively, it will not have the necessary resources to offer high-quality and diverse academic programs. Institutions unable to compete may face hard circumstances because government support continues to fall, students become better-informed consumers, and advances in technology also widen the number and reach of competitors. In turn, the ability to compete—for students, resources, faculty, and prestige—becomes the driving strategic force. At its extreme, competition can overtake more traditional academic values. However, the downside of pursing market goals without appropriately balancing them against the public good is ... is that institutions will no longer be able to fulfill their social responsibility to produce well-educated citizens and face the threat of losing their privileged place in society as they resemble more closely other market-driven organizations.
[11] Now, let’s move on to the second challenge facing U.S. higher education, that is, the tension between competition and equality in admissions decisions. [12] Since World War II, U.S. higher education has been engaged in a process of "massification," that is, expanding to serve students from all walks of life. Motivating this effort is a widespread belief in the power of education to create social and economic mobility and a belief in the morality and social value of making higher education accessible to everyone. Research data bear out public perceptions: When young people from low-income backgrounds complete a bachelor’s degree, their income and employment characteristics after graduation are equivalent to their peers from more affluent backgrounds. So, education can truly be "the great equalizer." Although there is widespread public faith in the value of higher education, the progress of massification has been slow and uneven. And why is it slow and uneven? [13-1] Well, one, higher education did not admit significant numbers of racial and ethnic minorities until after the civil rights of the 1960s forced change. Second, despite significant expenditures on financial aid, minority and low-income individuals are still less likely to attend college than whites or students from middle- and upper-income families— although access gaps have nowadays narrowed somewhat, large gaps remain between completion rates. [14] Low-income students come to college less prepared, and must balance academic demands with work and family responsibilities. [13-2] Finding ways to increase the enrollment rates of low-income students and encourage their success once enrolled are two of the most important problems facing American higher education. One of the challenges to meet these goals is that they can conflict with the other central tenets of American higher education, that is, market competition and resistance to government control, as I said before. For example, institutional competition for the most academically talented students is likely to encourage increased use of tuition discounting for students who have no financial need, and this could divert resources away from low-income students who need financial aid. Similarly, institutions may seek to distinguish themselves in the academic marketplace by becoming more selective in admissions decisions, thus reducing the number of low-income students admitted. [15] However, a primary role of government is to mediate the potentially negative effects of competition by insisting that institutions adhere to their missions, and that institutions provide need-based financial assistance to students. So, a constant preoccupation of American higher education is this tension between the competitive, ambitious nature of institutions and the interests of government in promoting important public goals, primary among them broad access and widespread success for all students.
OK. For today’s lecture, we have briefly discussed some of the major challenges facing U. S. higher education, such as the impact of the marketplace on institutions and the tension between competition and promoting public goals.
选项
答案
enrollment rates/admission rates
解析
细节归纳题。本题解释说明。“大众化”进程缓慢且不均衡的原因。句[13-1]提到,原因之一是在二十世纪六十年代强制改革之前,高校的种族和少数族裔学生的录取人数并不多。原文中没有能够直接用作答案的词语,但从语义来看,录取率低是其核心。同时由句[13-2]可以看出,高等教育急需解决的两个问题分别对应了上述的两个原因:入学率低和毕业率低。由此可以判断,enrollment rates或admission rates可以作为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ipIK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
GaokaoisChina’snationaluniversityadmissionstest,whichplacesheavyemphasisonforeignlanguagestudy.However,thegaoka
HowInterpretersWork?I.UnderstandingA.Aboutwordsandexpressions—【T1】______wordsmaybeleftout:【T1】______—Ifnotknow
FiveThingsforCollegeGraduatestoKnowI.Degreedoesnot【T1】______youtoajob【T1】______A.Yoursituationaftergraduatio
ControllingYourConcentrationI.TheconcernedinformationofconcentrationA.Yourattentionspan【T1】______【T1】______e.g.th
AdviceforStudents:HowtoTalktoProfessorsI.IntroductionA.Professors:normalpeople,justlikeeveryoneelseB.Student
A、Toturnoutanadequatenumberofeliteforthesociety.B、Topreparestudentsfortheirfuturecareer.C、Toofferpracticala
A、Freeticket.B、Freephonecall.C、Cashreward.D、Seatreservation.D本题考查对于主动转乘下一航班的旅客的补偿。根据录音,这样的旅客有可能得到cashbribe或afreetrip
A、Old-agesickness.B、Loosefamilyties.C、Poormentalabilities.D、Difficultiesinmaths.D本题考查McKay教授无法做出解释的内容。McKay教授说“似乎毫无疑问
A、75%ofthem.B、40%ofthem.C、35%ofthem.D、17.5%ofthem.A本题考查今年有多少美国人打算找新工作。访谈中,女士提到一个调查显示今年约有75%的美国人打算找新工作,因此选A。B中的40%是今年
(1)Cooperativecompetition.Competitivecooperation.Confused?Airlineallianceshavetravellersscratchingtheirheadsoverwha
随机试题
应激的中介机制不包括
A.大肠杆菌B.鸭疫里默氏杆菌C.炭疽杆菌D.猪丹毒杆菌E.多杀性巴氏杆菌能够引起牛出血性、猪肺疫,不能液化明胶培养基的病原是()。
患儿,女,10岁。肺动脉瓣听诊区听到3/6级收缩期杂音,同时听到不受呼吸影响的明显第二心音分裂。该患者可能患有
如果没有相反的证据,下列情形中,属于一致行动人的有()。
某市人民检察院报经市人大常委会批准。于2001年5月16日以贪污、受贿嫌疑将市人大代表温某逮捕,同月26日向市人民法院提起公诉。同年6月15日市人民法院对温某作出1年管制的判决。温某不服,上诉至省中级人民法院。省中级人民法院认为,一审判决认定事实证据不足,
党政机关公文是党政机关实施领导、履行职能、处理公务的具有特定效力和规范体式的文书。其中命令(令)适用于公布行政法规和规章、宣布施行重大强制性措施、批准授予和晋升衔级、嘉奖有关单位和人员。意见适用于对重要问题提出见解和处理办法。批复适用于答复下级机关请示事
著名经济学家钟朋荣曾将“温州人精神”概括为四句话:白手起家、艰苦奋斗的创业精神;不等不靠、依靠自己的自主精神;闯荡天下、四海为家的______精神;敢于创新、善于创新的创造精神。填入划横线部分最恰当的一项是:
甲、乙分别从A、B两地同时出发赶往B、A两地办事,在两地之间C地相遇,之后两人继续往前走。办完事后,两人又同时出发返回,在两地之间D地再次相遇。已知A、B两地相距11千米,C、D两地相距3千米,甲的速度快于乙,若两人分别从A、B同时出发不断往返于两地之间,
高考是从“孩子”迈向“大人”的一座桥。桥上有激烈竞争,但我们应教会他们更强调公平竞争;桥上有成功与失败,所以我们应鼓励他们永远不惮于向放弃说“不”;桥上有种种非考试因素的干扰,所以我们应引导他们培养定力、自制力、学会坚持。这确实是一座千军万马争相抢过的独木
从学生发展的角度来看,课程变革的着眼点是
最新回复
(
0
)