首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago
admin
2015-03-27
62
问题
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago, and the subject was salt. Researchers were claiming that salt supplementation was unnecessary after strenuous exercise, and this advice was being passed on by health reporters. All I knew was that I had played high school football in suburban Maryland, sweating profusely through double sessions in the swamp like 90-degree days of August. Without salt pills, I couldn’t make it through a two-hour practice; I couldn’t walk across the parking lot afterward without cramping.
While sports nutritionists have since come around to recommend that we should indeed replenish salt when we sweat it out in physical activity, the message that we should avoid salt at all other times remains strong. Salt consumption is said to raise blood pressure, cause hypertension and increase the risk of premature death. This is why the Department of Agriculture’s dietary guidelines still consider salt Public Enemy No. 1, coming before fats, sugars and alcohol. It’ s why the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has suggested that reducing salt consumption is as critical to long-term health as quitting cigarettes.
And yet, this eat-less-salt argument has been surprisingly controversial—and difficult to defend. Not because the food industry opposes it, but because the actual evidence to support it has always been so weak.
When I spent the better part of a year researching the state of the salt science back in 1998— already a quarter century into the eat-less-salt recommendations—journal editors and public health administrators were still remarkably candid in their assessment of how flimsy the evidence was implicating salt as the cause of hypertension.
While, back then, the evidence merely failed to demonstrate that salt was harmful, the evidence from studies published over the past two years actually suggests that restricting how much salt we eat can increase our likelihood of dying prematurely. Put simply, the possibility has been raised that if we were to eat as litde salt as the U.S.D.A. and theC.D.C. recommend, we’d be harming rather than helping ourselves.
Why have we been told that salt is so deadly? Well, the advice has always sounded reasonable. It has what nutritionists like to call "biological plausibility". Eat more salt and your body retains water to maintain a stable concentration of sodium in your blood. This is why eating salty food tends to make us thirsty: we drink more; we retain water. The result can be a temporary increase in blood pressure, which will persist until our kidneys eliminate both salt and water.
The scientific question is whether this temporary phenomenon translates to chronic problems: if we eat too much salt for years, does it raise our blood pressure, cause hypertension, then strokes, and then kill us prematurely? It makes sense, but it’s only a hypothesis. The reason scientists do experiments is to find out if hypotheses are true.
The N.I.H. has spent enormous sums of money on studies to test the hypothesis, and those studies have singularly failed to make the evidence any more conclusive.
With nearly everyone focused on the supposed benefits of salt restriction, little research was done to look at the potential dangers. But four years ago, Italian researchers began publishing the results from a series of clinical trials, all of which reported that, among patients with heart failure, reducing salt consumption increased the risk of death.
What the passage tries to tell the reader is that______.
选项
A、food industry misled people about salt consumption
B、strict salt consumption is necessary for people’s health
C、salt consumption has no direct effect upon people’s health
D、the suggestion of strict salt consumption might be misleading
答案
D
解析
整篇文章的大意是,盐对人的健康的影响其实并未得到证实,因此,严格控制盐的摄入量可能误导了人们对盐的负面作用的认识。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/iwCv777K
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
Althoughtheearliestfilmsincinemaweredoneintheshotwithoutanyediting,cuttingissofundamentaltothemediumthatit
JulietsaysinShakespeare’sRomeoandJuliet:"What’sinaname?Thatwhichwecallarosebyanyothernamewouldsmellasswe
Theactivityof______maymaximizethepossibilityofelicitingideas,wordsorconceptsfromstudentswhenitisfocusedonagi
IfateachergivescommandsinEnglishandasksstudentstoshowunderstandingbyactionorgestures,he/sheismostprobably
Whatdothefollowingsentencespractice?PeterandIwenttothecinemayesterday.PeterandIwenttothecinemayesterday.Pe
Whatreadingstrategydoes"pickingoutsomeparticularpiecesofinformationinatext"reflect?
Lookingbackonmychildhood,Iamconvincedthatnaturalistsarebornandnotmade.Althoughwewerebroughtupinthesameway
—Doyouregretpayingtendollarsforthatbook?—No,Iwouldgladlyhavepaid______.
DeathValleyisoneofthemostfamousdesertsintheUnitedStates,coveringawideareawithitsalkalisand.Almost20percen
AsimplepieceofropehangsbetweensomeenvironmentallyfriendlyAmericansandtheirneighbors.Ononesidestandthosewhoha
随机试题
怎样理解素质教育的内涵?
8位有符号数的二进制补码的表示范围为()
A、出生至l岁B、1~1岁半C、1岁半~2岁D、2岁半E、1~3岁出生后,生长发育最快的年龄阶段是()。
关于刑期计算,下列哪一说法是不正确的?
可满足设备材料采购需要的建设工程设计文件是()
下列观点,不属于儿童中心课程理论的是()。
李某放假回老家,在乘坐客运汽车的途中,被车窗外飞进的一块小石头击中左眼球,当场出血,被送往就近医院治疗,但因伤情严重导致失明。李某要求运输公司赔偿,但运输公司拒绝赔偿,理由是:李某的伤是外来的原因造成的,运输公司没有过错。李某和运输公司成立何种合同法律
考察被试在不同环境下问题解决的正确率,被试共40名,平均分成两个小组,分别在安静和轻音乐两个环境下解决问题,测得安静组被试平均正确率为0.6,标准差为0.1,轻音乐组被试平均正确率0.7,标准差为0.2。请问:本统计的推断结论是什么?(备注:单侧
定积分I=|sinx|.arctanexdx=______.
TravelAgent:FreedomTravel.HowmayIhelpyou?Caller:Yes,I’dliketomakeaflightreservationforthetwenty-thirdofthi
最新回复
(
0
)