首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Last year, when President George W. Bush announced that federal funds could be used to support re search on human embryonic stem
Last year, when President George W. Bush announced that federal funds could be used to support re search on human embryonic stem
admin
2010-07-19
51
问题
Last year, when President George W. Bush announced that federal funds could be used to support re search on human embryonic stem cells, he mandated that only those cell lines that existed at the time would qualify for such support. More than a year later it’s becoming increasingly clear that these existing cell lines are inadequate. Unless more are created, the research slowdown may exact a staggering cost in terms of human suffering.
Since this announcement, the U. S National Institutes of Health has tried to stimulate research on the existing cell lines with new funding and efforts to streamline the initially cumbersome process of obtaining approved cells. However, whether there are 60 cell lines, as originally stated, or nine, as now appear to be available to NIH-funded investigators, the number is not adequate. Given the genetic diversity within the population, scientists need access to new cell lines if they are to come up with the most effective cell therapies.
The issue is partly one of safety. In conducting research with human participants, we must minimize risks. The most effective cell line might not be the safest. When developing a new medicine, a large number of molecules must be screened to find a balance between effectiveness and safety. The same is true with cells: In the context of cell therapy, it will be important to minimize unwanted immune reactions and inflammation. This requires selection from a large number of cell lines to obtain the best match.
It’s clear from experiments with animals that stem--cell therapies can reduce human suffering. Parkinsonian mice have been cured with embryonic stem cells that were programmed to become dopamine-secreting, replacement nerve cells. Soon, cells induced to make insulin in tissue cultures will be used in attempts to treat diabetic mice. Similar successes have been achieved in animal models of spinal cord injury, heart failure and other degenerative disorders. We are at a frontier in medicine where tissues will be re stored in ways that were not imaginable just a few years ago. The ethical issues raised by human-embryo research are profound. The human costs of restricting this research must be taken into account as well. The cost in dollars of delaying new stem-cell research is difficult to estimate. It might measure in the hundreds of billions of dollars, especially if one adds the lost productivity of individuals who must leave work to care for victims of degenerative disorders.
A less obvious, but real, cost is the damage to the fabric of America’s extraordinary culture of inquiry and technical development in biomedical science. Our universities and teaching hospitals are unparalleled. We attract the very best students, scientists and physicians from around the world. But these institutions are fragile. Research and education play key roles in attracting the best physicians. A crippled research enterprise might add an unbearable stress with long-lasting effects on the entire system. If revolutionary new therapies are delayed or outlawed, we could be set back for years, if not decades.
To steer clear of controversy, some investigators will redirect their research. Others will emigrate to countries where such research is allowed and encouraged. Some will drop out entirely. The pall cast over the science community could extend far beyond stem-cell research. Many therapies have emerged from collaboration between government-sponsored researchers and private enterprise. Few of these discoveries would have emerged ii, for instance, recombinant DNA research had been outlawed 30 years ago. We face the same type of decision today with limits placed on human embryonic stem cells.
Safeguards will be necessary. But if we do not proceed embracing the values of objective, open, inquiry with complete sharing of methods and results, the field will be left to less rigorous fringe groups here and abroad. Patients and society will suffer.
It can he inferred from the first paragraph that the author ______.
选项
A、is in favor of stem-cell research.
B、welcomes the research slowdown.
C、takes a neutral stand on the research.
D、thinks it essential to speed up the research.
答案
A
解析
推断题。由题干定位至首段。末句指出:如果找不到更多的细胞株,研究就会停下来,这会让人们遭受极大的痛苦。可见,作者是认同体细胞研究的,故[A]为答案。[B]与此矛盾,排除。首段未提及加快研究速度,[D]无依据,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/iylO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
AccordingtoSamanthaHeller,peopletendtoeatmilkchocolatebecause
Theauthor’sattitudetowardsthecurrentsituationintheexploitationofnaturalresourcesis______.Itcanbeinferredfrom
Peopledonotanalyzeeveryproblemtheymeet.Sometimestheytrytorememberasolutionfromthelasttimetheyhadasimilarp
______isrecognizedasthelongestriverinGreatBritain.
A、thedecisionscanbetakenmoreeasily.B、EU’srelationshiptothememberstatesisclearlyregulatedC、thevotingprocedures
MultinationalCorporationsMultinationalinvestmenthas【1】________.【1】________.Establishmentofam
The"ShadowCabinet"isorganizedby______inBritain.
FivePowerKeysforLeadershipSuccessManypeoplehopetobecomeasuccessfulleader.Infact,thereare5powerkeyswhich
随机试题
钩体病首剂青霉素治疗后2~4小时突起发冷、寒战、高热,全身痛及头痛,心率、呼吸加快,严重者发生休克钩体病患者早期出现高热、全身酸痛的机制是由于
患者,女,38岁。眩晕,自汗;心悸,失眠,多梦,腹胀便溏,食少,体倦,面色无华。其病理变化是
A.凡未被病原微生物污染的区域B.经灭菌处理且未被污染的区域C.用物理方法清除物体表面的污垢D.通过物理或化学方法灭菌后保持无菌状态的物品E.经过灭菌处理但又被污染的区域无菌区()
长江中游某河段为典型的汊道浅滩,经常出现碍航现象,严重影响船舶航行安全,必须进行治理。采取的工程措施为护滩和筑坝。某施工单位承担了该整治工程的施工任务,并按照设计文件的要求进行施工,当完成系结压载软体排护底分项工程后,施工单位要求监理工程师进行质量评定,监
小学生根据课文描述想象出雷锋叔叔的模样,这属于()。
奥组委总部设在()。
在一些没有护堤常识的人看来,那细小的裂缝也许是_______的,老农也_______太大惊小怪了吧。填入横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
WTO的服务贸易规则中规定的商业存在是指服务提供者在外国建立商业机构,为消费者服务。()
在信息系统工程监理过程中,专家发挥了重要的作用和价值。以下_________不属于专家的职责。
A、Hesoldhisinventiontomakemoney.B、Hepreferredinventiontoteaching.C、Hewashonoredwithanawardforhisteachingmet
最新回复
(
0
)