首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Speaking two languages rather than just one has obvious practical benefits in an increasingly globalized world. But in recent ye
Speaking two languages rather than just one has obvious practical benefits in an increasingly globalized world. But in recent ye
admin
2016-10-24
47
问题
Speaking two languages rather than just one has obvious practical benefits in an increasingly globalized world. But in recent years, scientists have begun to show that the advantages of bilingualism are even more fundamental than being able to converse with a wider range of people. Being bilingual, it turns out, makes you smarter. It can have a profound effect on your brain, improving cognitive skills not related to language and even shielding against dementia in old age.
This view of bilingualism is remarkably different from the understanding of bilingualism through much of the 20th century. Researchers, educators and policy makers long considered a second language to be an interference, cognitively speaking, that hindered a child’s academic and intellectual development.
They were not wrong about the interference: there is ample evidence that in a bilingual’s brain both language systems are active even when he is using only one language, thus creating situations in which one system obstructs the other. But this interference, researchers are finding out, isn’t so much a handicap as a blessing in disguise. It forces the brain to resolve internal conflict, giving the mind a workout that strengthens its cognitive muscles.
Bilinguals, for instance, seem to be more adept than monolinguals at solving certain kinds of mental puzzles. In a 2004 study by the psychologists Ellen Bialystok and Michelle Martin-Rhee, bilingual and monolingual preschoolers were asked to sort blue circles and red squares presented on a computer screen into two digital bins—one marked with a blue square and the other marked with a red circle.
In the first task, the children had to sort the shapes by color, placing blue circles in the bin marked with the blue square and red squares in the bin marked with the red circle. Both groups did this with comparable ease. Next, the children were asked to sort by shape, which was more challenging because it required placing the images in a bin marked with a conflicting color. The bilinguals were quicker at performing this task.
The collective evidence from a number of such studies suggests that the bilingual experience improves the brain’s so-called executive function—a command system that directs the attention processes that we use for planning, solving problems and performing various other mentally demanding tasks. These processes include ignoring distractions to stay focused, switching attention willfully from one thing to another and holding information in mind—like remembering a sequence of directions while driving.
Why does the tussle between two simultaneously active language systems improve these aspects of cognition? Until recently, researchers thought the bilingual advantage stemmed primarily from an ability for inhibition that was honed by the exercise of suppressing one language system: this suppression, it was thought, would help train the bilingual mind to ignore distractions in other contexts. But that explanation increasingly appears to be inadequate, since studies have shown that bilinguals perform better than monolinguals even at tasks that do not require inhibition, like threading a line through an ascending series of numbers scattered randomly on a page.
The key difference between bilinguals and monolinguals may be more basic: a heightened ability to monitor the environment. "Bilinguals have to switch languages quite often—you may talk to your father in one language and to your mother in another language, " says Albert Costa, a researcher at the University of Pompea Fabra in Spain. "It requires keeping track of changes around you in the same way that we monitor our surroundings when driving. " In a study comparing German-Italian bilinguals with Italian monolinguals on monitoring tasks, Mr. Costa and his colleagues found that the bilingual subjects not only performed better, but they also did so with less activity in parts of the brain involved in monitoring, indicating that they were more efficient at it.
Which of the following best characterizes the researchers’ view of a second language through much of the 20th century?
选项
A、Distorted.
B、Negative.
C、Cynical.
D、Paradoxical.
答案
B
解析
以下哪个词语最恰当地反映研究人员在20世纪大部分时间里对第二语言的看法?否定。第二段第二句说,研究人员、教育工作者和决策者长期把第二语言看成是一种干扰因素,从认知的角度讲,它妨碍孩子的学术和智力发展。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/j3GO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Readingbooksisahabitthatispopularly【C1】______bymoreandmorepeople.Itbenefitsourlivesbyimprovingourknowledgeto
Readingbooksisahabitthatispopularly【C1】______bymoreandmorepeople.Itbenefitsourlivesbyimprovingourknowledgeto
IknowthatifIstartwatchingsoapoperaIwillimmediatelybecomehopelessly______toit.
Henrywentthroughthedocumentsagaincarefullyforfearof______anyimportantdata.
Inminuteshehastakenoverthewhole______,lyingunderthesinkandsquinting(眯眼看)upintothemachinery.
Inthepast,Americancollegesanduniversitieswerecreatedtoserveadualpurposetoadvancelearningandtoofferachancet
Awisemanoncesaidthattheonlythingnecessaryforthetriumphofevilisforgoodmentodonothing.So,asapoliceoffice
Everyyearanumberofstudentsgraduatefromtheschoolwhichwill______newstudentsthefirstweekinSeptember.
Thepolice______toemergenciesinjustafewminuteswhentheaccidenthappened.
OnthemorningofSeptember11th,IboardedthetrainfromWashingtonHeightsinUpperManhattanjustasusualandwenttotheB
随机试题
根管的工作长度是指
特发性血小板减少性紫癜的主要治疗是
“用寒远寒,用热远热”,属于
下面关于敌枯双中毒的表述正确的是( )。
根据行政复议法律制度的规定,下列有关行政复议的表述中,不正确的是()。
()是指预定的战略目标或标准,是战略控制的依据。
苛勒的完形一顿悟说与桑代克的试误说的区别是()。
学生害怕在社交场合讲话,担心自己会因发抖,脸红,声音发颤,口吃而暴露自己的焦虑.觉得自己说话不自然,因而不敢抬头,不敢正视对方眼睛,这种心理状态是一种()。
Couldthebadolddaysofeconomicdeclinebeabouttoreturn?SinceOPECagreedtosupply-cutsinMarch,thepriceofcrudeoil
在UML动态建模机制中,关于顺序图说法正确的是______。
最新回复
(
0
)