首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. C
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. C
admin
2013-08-12
49
问题
Family Matters
This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Government.
That
does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure. Others who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will
subvert
relations within the family: cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality proves insufficient. Wyoming needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to show it up.
Wyoming faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60 years of age. Demography is
inexorable
. In 1980, 7. 2% of the population was in this bracket. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age person. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized societies.
The problem in Wyoming is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into the problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what about the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support? They have several options:(a)get a job and work until they die;(b)apply for public assistance(you have to be destitute to apply); or(c)starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have so far kept Wyoming from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order if it is unjust.
Those who
deride
the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits miss the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s—not society’s—responsibility to look after his parents. Wyoming is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice.
(A)
But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace.(B)
The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened.(C)
It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the
recalcitrant
son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.(D)
It would be nice to think Wyoming doesn’t need this kind of law. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.
The word
recalcitrant
in Paragraph 13 is closest in meaning to______.
选项
A、relent
B、stolid
C、unruly
D、unfilial
答案
D
解析
本题为词汇题,主要考查考生根据上下文对单词recalcitrant的理解。该词所在句子的意思是:如果recalcitrant子女知道这是一种公开的审判……既然受审判的是子女,根据上下文可以判断出recalcitrant的意思是“叛逆的,反抗的”,因此,选项D(不孝顺的)为最佳答案。选项A(温和的)、B(迟钝的)和C(不守规矩的)都是干扰项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/kEfO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
Labelthediagrambelow.WriteNOMORETHANTWOWORDSforeachanswer.
Labeltheplanbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTWOWORDSforeachanswer.
Completethenotesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTWOWORDSforeachanswer.AssemblyStep1Fold(26)inhalf.
WritetheappropriatelettersA-Cagainstquestions26~30.Accordingtothespeakers,inwhichsituationarethefollowingm
Completethenotesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.PersonalityQuestionnairescom
Whenisthisyear’sfestivalbeingheld?
Choosethecorrectanswer,A,BorC.AdbourneFilmFestivalLastyear’swinningfilmwasabout
Completetheformbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTWOWORDSORANUMBERforeachanswer.Healthclubcustomerrese
Completetheformbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTWOWORDSORANUMBERforeachanswer.Healthclubcustomerrese
(Itwas)the(splitof)elevensouthern(states)fromtheUnionin1861that(leading)totheCivilWarintheUnitedStates.
随机试题
有X和Y两种元素,形成化合物的化学式为X2Y,其式量为44,X元素的质量分数为63.6%,计算X和Y的相对原子质量。
车船的所有人或管理人未缴纳车船税的,车船税的代缴人是()
请将下列各式抄在答题卡上,并在括号内填人适当的符号,使之成为有效的三段论式。
抗反流屏障包括
A.触摸大动脉搏动B.钡4量血压C.人工呼吸及心脏按压D.非同步直流电除颤E.同步直流电除颤确定心脏骤停后应当首先的最基本的生命支持方法是
甲公司拟自建一条生产线,与该生产线建造相关的情况如下:(1)2014年1月1日,甲公司发行公司债券专门筹集生产线建设资金,该公司债券为3年期,系分期付息、到期还本的债券,面值总额为3000万元,票面年利率为5%,发行价格为307.0万元;另在发行过程中支
下列法律事实中,属于法律事件的是()。
(x2+x+1)7的展开式的系数的和为().
根据以下资料,回答下列问题。2012年末,中国大陆总人口135404万人,全年出生人口1635万人,死亡人口966万人。从性别结构看,男性人口69395万人,同比增加327万人,女性人口66009万人,同比增加342万人;从城乡结构看,城镇人口7
面向数据流的软件设计方法,一般是把数据流图中的数据流划分为什么样的两种流再将数据流图映射为软件结构?
最新回复
(
0
)