首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. C
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. C
admin
2013-08-12
63
问题
Family Matters
This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Government.
That
does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure. Others who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will
subvert
relations within the family: cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality proves insufficient. Wyoming needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to show it up.
Wyoming faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60 years of age. Demography is
inexorable
. In 1980, 7. 2% of the population was in this bracket. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age person. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized societies.
The problem in Wyoming is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into the problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what about the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support? They have several options:(a)get a job and work until they die;(b)apply for public assistance(you have to be destitute to apply); or(c)starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have so far kept Wyoming from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order if it is unjust.
Those who
deride
the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits miss the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s—not society’s—responsibility to look after his parents. Wyoming is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice.
(A)
But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace.(B)
The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened.(C)
It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the
recalcitrant
son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.(D)
It would be nice to think Wyoming doesn’t need this kind of law. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.
The word
recalcitrant
in Paragraph 13 is closest in meaning to______.
选项
A、relent
B、stolid
C、unruly
D、unfilial
答案
D
解析
本题为词汇题,主要考查考生根据上下文对单词recalcitrant的理解。该词所在句子的意思是:如果recalcitrant子女知道这是一种公开的审判……既然受审判的是子女,根据上下文可以判断出recalcitrant的意思是“叛逆的,反抗的”,因此,选项D(不孝顺的)为最佳答案。选项A(温和的)、B(迟钝的)和C(不守规矩的)都是干扰项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/kEfO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
Labelthediagrambelow.WriteNOMORETHANTWOWORDSforeachanswer.
Labelplanbelow.ChooseyouranswersfromtheboxbelowandwritethelettersA-Hnexttoquestions17-20.A.AvocadoP
Labeltheplanbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTWOWORDSforeachanswer.
Completethenotesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTWOWORDSforeachanswer.AgricultureandEnvironment(31)productio
Questions18-20Completethesentencesbelow.WriteONEWORDONLYforeachanswer.BowelCoachingCourseHealthprofessionalsw
Completethenotesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.PersonalityQuestionnairescom
Completethenotesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.TheWorldHealthOrganisationsaysahealthycitymust
Choosethecorrectanswer,A,BorC.AdbourneFilmFestivalThedeadlineforenteringafilminthecompetitionistheendof
Completethenotesbelow.WriteONEWORDforeachanswer.PotterynotesEarthenwareadvantages:-po
随机试题
在旅游企业营销实践活动中最常见的调研方法主要有文案调查法、________、观察调查法和实验调查法。
依法治国和以德治国的主要区别在于()。
口底、颌下和颈部的急性蜂窝织炎可并发
甲欲抢劫着便衣的警察乙的财物,将乙推倒在地,并抽出尖刀对准乙的脸上划了一刀,逼迫其交出钱财。乙迫不得已掏出身上的手枪朝甲开了一枪,但由于甲躲闪很快而未受伤。本案中,对乙的行为,下列说法不正确的是:()
关于项目信息门户,下列说法正确的是()。
下列不属于通信三要素的是()。
法国的郎香教堂是由著名的建筑设计师________设计的,是一座既怪诞又充满神秘感的宗教建筑,这也正是西方现代艺术追求的一种艺术倾向。
中国古代历史最长的选官制度是()。
在国内,“奥数”一度受到学校和家长的追捧,甚至成为学生的升学条件。“全民奥数”有没有必要?一些专家认为,“奥数”过于注重考试,而非关注学生知识的增加。下列各项如果为真.最能削弱上述结论的是:
Whilethenewsseemstohighlightthemountingexternalandinternalpressuresthataredrivinglanguageendangerment,notall
最新回复
(
0
)