首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can famous people’s support for international aid organizations draw public attention to charity? The following are the supporte
Can famous people’s support for international aid organizations draw public attention to charity? The following are the supporte
admin
2022-11-07
82
问题
Can famous people’s support for international aid organizations draw public attention to charity? The following are the supporters’ and opponents’ opinions. Read carefully the opinions from both sides and write your response in about 200 words, in which you should first summarize briefly the opinions from both sides and then give your view on the issue.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
Yes:
International charity groups can take advantage of the publicity of celebrities. With many high-profile figures, such as famous singers, movie stars and star athletes, joining in the promotion of charitable activities, the activities or campaigns of international charity organizations can be responded immediately.
As an eyeball-catching group, famous people should and could pass on their positive influence, for the words and deeds of those top stars could set a good example for the public.
Celebrities, as a respectable group, usually live under the spotlight, receive maximum praise and considerable economic rewards. Hence, they are expected to make their unique contribution to the society as a returned favor. By making a donation to the charity appeal, they fulfill their social responsibilities, show their kindness to the needed, and therefore get a sense of satisfaction.
No:
A small group of celebrities don’t gain much popularity and can’t bring any convenience to international aid organizations. Although some celebrities give their support to these organizations outwardly, they don’t bring any tangible help.
Stars’ individual contributions are limited and thus less significant in terms of resolving some international problems such as helping the population of poverty-stricken countries shake off poverty or tackling global environmental problems.
The influence of celebrities might be a double-edged sword. If some stars fail to practice what they preach, the public might lose confidence in the organizations they have publicized.
选项
答案
Is the Celebrity Effect Useful? With a sea of reports about celebrities’ love affairs, drug abuse and other bad deeds, many people think they have set negative examples for adolescents. As a result, citizens may doubt their motive when they provide support for international aid organizations and even the reliability of the philanthropic organizations. However, it has also been argued that famous people can help raise large amounts of money as well as draw public attention to charity. Personally speaking, the involvement of notables in international charity can draw high attention to the plight of the country concerned. Firstly, luminaries themselves can not only make substantial donation to the needy groups but also call on more people to provide assistance. Furthermore, celebrities play an important role in publicizing charity culture and mobilizing international support. Last but not least, idolaters, most of whom are youths, are used to blindly following every aspect of celebrities’ behavior. Therefore, more young people will be likely to participate in the charity activities, which will make international aid organizations get twice the result with half the effort. In conclusion, everyone has an obligation to contribute as much as he can to the international charity, not to mention famous people. Celebrity philanthropy is a must, but the celebrity effect should be used appropriately.
解析
本题讨论的是名人对国际援助组织的支持是否有助于提升人们对慈善的关注度。在具体行文方面,考生首先要总结材料,概述正反双方的观点。然后给出自己的观点:名人参与国际慈善事业确实能够使人们高度关注相关问题。最后总结全文。
开头部分阐述背景,引出话题:由于名人的负面新闻给青少年树立了消极的榜样,因此当名人对国际援助组织提供帮助时,市民不仅质疑其动机,甚至还会怀疑慈善组织的可靠性。接着提出对立观点:名人对国际援助组织的支持不仅有助于筹集大量捐款,还能吸引公众关注慈善事业。
中间部分通过“Personally speaking…”阐述自己的观点:名人参与国际慈善事业确实能够使人们关注到相关国家的困难。并用“Firstly…”“Furthermore…”和 “Last but not least…”阐述理由:名人不仅自己能够给需要帮助的人捐献大量资金,还能够号召更多的人提供帮助;借助明星效应,名人在宣传慈善文化和动员国际援助方面发挥着很大的作用;追星族大多数都是年轻人,他们盲目地模仿名人各个方面的行为,因此,更多的年轻人也很有可能参与到慈善活动中去,从而使国际援助组织收到事半功倍的效果。
结尾部分通过“In conclusion…”总结全文。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/kacD777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Justsevenyearsago,theTexasLegislatureprescribedthatallhighschoolersmustpasstwomathcoursesandgeometrytogradua
Justsevenyearsago,theTexasLegislatureprescribedthatallhighschoolersmustpasstwomathcoursesandgeometrytogradua
Justsevenyearsago,theTexasLegislatureprescribedthatallhighschoolersmustpasstwomathcoursesandgeometrytogradua
Asimpleideasupportsscience:"trust,butverify".Resultsshouldalwaysbe【C1】________tochallengefromexperiment.Thatsimp
Longtimeago,everyoneknewthatregularbedtimeswereimportant."Dreamon!"mostmodernparentsmightreply.Butresearchby
[A]Bringavisualreminder[B]Eatnothingbeforeshopping[C]Primeyourselfforhealthyeating[D]Useahalf
Theteachersaidshewould________thestudentsdoingsomuchhomeworkiftheycoulddowellinthemid-termexam.
WhichofthefollowingitalicizedphrasesisINCORRECT?
Whenheheardthathehadlostallthemoneyhepossessedinstockmarket,theironenteredintohis________.
随机试题
聖王在上而民不凍飢者,非能耕而食之,織而衣之也,為開其資財之道也。故堯、禹有九年之水,湯有七年之旱,而國亡捐瘠者,以畜積多而備先具也。今海內為一,土地人民之秉,不避禹、湯,加以亡天災數年之水旱,而畜積未及者,何也?地有道利,民有餘力。生榖之土未盡
党的根本组织原则是()
焦油水系统采用(),以减少焦油水在沉淀分离过程中对环境的污染。
使用多河段模型时,在河流上设置分段断面,不正确的位置有()。
工程咨询是智力服务性行业,是为()对经济建设和工程项目的投资决策与实施提供咨询服务。
下列各项业务中,在收回委托加工应税消费品后仍应征收消费税的有()。
在新西兰惠灵顿维多利亚大学亚历山大.布克看来,历史问题之所以重要,是因为对历史的______,是界定一个国家在国际社会角色和地位的______。“它不仅是研究历史的问题,还涉及界定当代国家身份。”填入划横线部分最恰当的一项是:
根据所给资料,回答下列小题。2012年全国规模以上工业企业实现利润55578亿元,同比增长5.3%。12月当月实现利润8952亿元,同比增长17.3%。2012年在规模以上工业企业中,国有及国有控股企业实现利润14163亿元,同比下降5.1%;集体企业
下列关于操作系统的正确叙述是( )。
【S1】【S8】
最新回复
(
0
)