首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Directors of Occidental Petroleum Corp. want to keep Chief Executive Ray R. Irani safe. So they spent $774,756 last year on home
Directors of Occidental Petroleum Corp. want to keep Chief Executive Ray R. Irani safe. So they spent $774,756 last year on home
admin
2021-02-21
90
问题
Directors of Occidental Petroleum Corp. want to keep Chief Executive Ray R. Irani safe. So they spent $774,756 last year on home-alarm systems and around-the-clock security guards for the CEO. "We live in dangerous times," a company spokesman says. "Executives from oil-and-gas companies have been threatened and kidnapped."
Directors of Valero Energy Corp., a rival oil concern with more than four times Occidental’s revenue, aren’t as worried. Their spending on security for CEO William R. Klesse last year totaled just $239 for a home-alarm monitoring service, a fringe benefit recently extended to all Valero workers. Bill Day, a spokesman, notes the company isn’t well known.
The difference in security spending for big-company CEOs emerged in an analysis of 247 recent proxy statements for The Wall Street Journal by James F. Reda & Associates, a New York pay consultancy. The differences reflect risk assessments by outside security advisers, a CEO’s term of office and whether a company is involved in high-risk regions, experts say. The 247 companies represent the Fortune 300 companies that had filed their latest proxies at the time of the analysis.
For the most generous boards, "it’s almost like an arms race as directors demonstrate how critical their chief executive is to the company," says Mark Borges, a pay consultant at Compensia Inc. in San Jose, Calif.
Of the 247 proxy statements reviewed, 91 companies reported security expenses to protect their CEOs, and 56 of those specified an amount. Some companies don’t disclose a dollar figure because it is below reporting thresholds; others count security as an ordinary business expense. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) considers security at an executive’s residence or during personal travel a fringe benefit that should be disclosed if the value reaches a certain threshold.
The biggest spender in Reda’s study was Oracle Corp. The software maker paid about $1.7 million in the year ended May 31, mainly for guards at residences of Lawrence Ellison, its billionaire CEO and founder. Board members support the expenditure because he’s so important to Oracle, according to the latest proxy statement. It also says Mr. Ellison paid to install and maintain his home-security systems. Oracle declined to comment.
Next up was Limited Brands Inc., which spent $1.25 million in the year ended Feb. 2 to protect CEO Leslie Wexner, who founded the company in 1963. The total includes an unspecified amount for his personal use of corporate aircraft, which the company requires.
Limited’s proxy statement lacks other details, but people familiar with the situation say the bill covers security for Mr. Wexner’s 22,371-square-foot home on a 300-acre estate in nearby New Albany, as well as for other homes and a yacht. The statement says directors approved the spending because of "the risks associated with Mr. Wexner’s role and position. "Founder CEOs often become targets of specific threats identified with their religion, an informed individual said. Mr. Wexner declined to comment.
Such justifications for shelling out big bucks to protect corporate chiefs don’t sway some activist investors. "Security has become a convenient excuse for getting shareholders to pick up the cost for the CEO’s lifestyle," complains Richard Ferlauto, director of corporate governance and pension investment at the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.
[A] says the most generous boards regard security spending as a demonstration of their CEO’s importance.
[B] considers that security expenses should be disclosed if the value reaches a certain threshold.
[C] made an analysis of 247 proxy statements.
[D] earned four times more money than Occidental did.
[E] extended home-alarm monitoring service to all its workers.
[F] holds that justifications for the security spending for CEO don’t sway some activist investors.
[G] says security has been an excuse for getting shareholders to pay for the CEO’s lifestyle.
SEC
选项
答案
B
解析
SEC出现在第五段末句,是美国证券交易委员会(Securities and Exchange Commission)的缩写。该句提到美国证交会规定用于首席执行官住宅或个人旅行期间的安保费用应被视为额外的福利津贴.达到一定金额后应予以披露。B项复现了原文的considers和should be disclosed if the value reaches a certain threshold,表述意思也与原文一致,故为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/kmY4777K
0
考研英语二
相关试题推荐
Theword"this"(Paragraph1)probablyrefersto______.Accordingtothetext,geneticengineeringcanbeusedto______.
Theauthorthinksthatpullfactors______.People’sdecisionstomigratemightbeinfluencedbyallthefollowingEXCEPT____
Excitement,fatigue,andanxietycanallbedetectedfromsomeone’sblinks,accordingtopsychologistJohnStern(21)Washington
Excitement,fatigue,andanxietycanallbedetectedfromsomeone’sblinks,accordingtopsychologistJohnStern(21)Washington
Ifelt______todeathbecauseIcouldmakenothingofthechairman’sspeech.
JohnDeweybelievedthateducationshouldbeapreparationforlife,thatapersonlearnsbydoing,andthatteachingmust_____
Thebesttitleforthispassagewouldbe______.Defenseattorneysarevitaltothejudicialsystembecausewithoutthem,itwo
Theopportunitytoexploreandplayandtheencouragementtodosocan______theperformanceofmanychildren.
Awomanwithatwinbrotherhasfewerchildren.Twinbrotherscanleavequiteanimpression.Themerepresenceofaboyinthes
Brothersandsistersfight,butwhenthebickeringevolvesintophysicaloremotionalabuse,it’sbullying.Ordinaryargumentso
随机试题
关于法律部门与法律体系,下列哪一说法是错误的?()
氨茶碱静脉推注时,可以致()
早孕与月经后期的鉴别错误的是
在保管过程中,相对于其他影响药品质量的因素来说,最为重要的因素是
下面属于单位工程竣工验收应具备的条件的有()。
从事生产经营的纳税人不得转借、转让发票,但根据需要可以代开。()
进出口化妆品检验及监督管理的规定主要包括( )。
作为一个发展中国家,自主创新并非自己创新,更非封闭式创新。不能排斥技术引进,但技术创新能力无法通过引进直接获得,关键技术更是买不来,日本和韩国引进技术和消化吸收费用的比例分别为1:5和1:8,而我国的比例为1:0.15。由此可见,我国技术引进的主要
美国著名的行政学家西蒙认为:管理就是决策。美国学者马文曾对高层管理者进行调查,对他们提出三个问题:“你每天花时间最多在哪些方面?”“你认为每天中最重要的事是什么?”“你在履行你的职责时,感到最困难的是什么?”结果,90%以上的回答是:决策。据有关统计,由于
设有定义:charp[]={’1’,’2’,’3’},*q=p;,以下不能计算出一个char型数据所占字节数的表达式是( )。
最新回复
(
0
)